Literature DB >> 22268910

Feature migration in time: reflection of selective attention on speech errors.

Nazbanou Nozari1, Gary S Dell.   

Abstract

This article describes an initial study of the effect of focused attention on phonological speech errors. In 3 experiments, participants recited 4-word tongue twisters and focused attention on 1 (or none) of the words. The attended word was singled out differently in each experiment; participants were under instructions to avoid errors on the attended word, to stress it, or to say it silently. The experiments showed that all methods of attending to a word decreased errors on that word, while increasing errors on the surrounding words. However, this error increase did not result from a relative increase in phonemic migrations originating from the attended word. This pattern is inconsistent with conceptualizing attention either as a higher activation of the attended word or greater inhibition of the unattended words throughout the production of the sequence. Instead, it is consistent with a model that presumes that attention exerts its effect at the time of production of the attended word, without lingering effects on the past or the future. 2012 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22268910      PMCID: PMC3475410          DOI: 10.1037/a0026933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  17 in total

1.  What the eyes say about speaking.

Authors:  Z M Griffin; K Bock
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-07

2.  Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: modeling attentional control in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Ardi Roelofs
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect.

Authors:  Gary M Oppenheim; Gary S Dell
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-04-02

4.  Language production and serial order: a functional analysis and a model.

Authors:  G S Dell; L K Burger; W R Svec
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  The possible role of selective attention in acquired dyslexia.

Authors:  T Shallice; E K Warrington
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects.

Authors:  A Treisman; H Schmidt
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  A feature-integration theory of attention.

Authors:  A M Treisman; G Gelade
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Developmental attentional dyslexia.

Authors:  Naama Friedmann; Noa Kerbel; Lilach Shvimer
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  A peripheral reading deficit under conditions of diffuse visual attention.

Authors:  G W Humphreys; K Mayall
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Paying attention to reading errors in acquired dyslexia.

Authors:  Colin Davis; Max Coltheart
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  8 in total

1.  More attention when speaking: does it help or does it hurt?

Authors:  Nazbanou Nozari; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  The effects of anodal stimulation of the left prefrontal cortex on sentence production.

Authors:  Nazbanou Nozari; Jennifer E Arnold; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  "Twisting fingers": The case for interactivity in typed language production.

Authors:  Svetlana Pinet; Nazbanou Nozari
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

4.  The exception does not rule: attention constrains form preparation in word production.

Authors:  Pádraig G O'Séaghdha; Alexandra K Frazer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Planning and production of grammatical and lexical verbs in multi-word messages.

Authors:  Violaine Michel Lange; Maria Messerschmidt; Peter Harder; Hartwig Roman Siebner; Kasper Boye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Novel stress phonotactics are learnable by English speakers: Novel tone phonotactics are not.

Authors:  Yuan Bian; Gary S Dell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-02

7.  Characterizing multi-word speech production using event-related potentials.

Authors:  Stephanie K Ries; Svetlana Pinet; N Bonnie Nozari; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Verbal Working Memory as Emergent from Language Comprehension and Production.

Authors:  Steven C Schwering; Maryellen C MacDonald
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.