Literature DB >> 20577820

Disclosing cancer genetic information within families: perspectives of counselees and their at-risk relatives.

Afsaneh Hayat Roshanai1, Claudia Lampic, Richard Rosenquist, Karin Nordin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the present descriptive study was to investigate the experience of sharing genetic information among cancer genetic counselees and their at-risk relatives.
METHODS: In total, 147 cancer genetic counselees and 81 of their at-risk relatives answered to a study specific questionnaire and/or were interviewed. Counselees' communication of genetic information to at-risk relatives was assessed with regard to who they informed, how they felt, and how they perceived their relatives' reactions. In addition, at-risk relatives' experiences of receiving genetic information were studied.
RESULTS: Most of the counselees had shared the genetic information received at the counseling session personally with their at-risk relatives. The majority of the counselees (68%) reported positive or neutral feelings about sharing the genetic information with their relatives while 9% stated negative feelings. Counselees mostly interpreted the relatives' reactions to the information as positive or neutral (62% of responses), and in few cases as negative (14% of responses). About half of relatives reported positive or neutral reactions (54%) to the received information, while about one-fifth reported negative reactions (22%). Nevertheless, most relatives were satisfied with the received information and half of the relatives intended to seek genetic counseling themselves.
CONCLUSION: Sharing genetic information to at-risk relatives appears to be accomplished without any major difficulties or negative feelings. However, more assistance may be needed to optimize the communication of the genetic information within at-risk families.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20577820     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-010-9364-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  21 in total

1.  Balancing autonomy and responsibility: the ethics of generating and disclosing genetic information.

Authors:  N Hallowell; C Foster; R Eeles; A Ardern-Jones; V Murday; M Watson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Voluntary disclosure of BRCA1 mutation test results.

Authors:  Ken R Smith; Cathleen D Zick; Robert N Mayer; Jeffery R Botkin
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2002

Review 3.  Communicating genetic information in families--a review of guidelines and position papers.

Authors:  Laura E Forrest; Martin B Delatycki; Loane Skene; MaryAnne Aitken
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Disclosing genetic test results to family members.

Authors:  Rebekah J Hamilton; Barbara J Bowers; Janet K Williams
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.176

5.  Does enhanced information at cancer genetic counseling improve counselees' knowledge, risk perception, satisfaction and negotiation of information to at-risk relatives?--a randomized study.

Authors:  Afsaneh Hayat Roshanai; Richard Rosenquist; Claudia Lampic; Karin Nordin
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.089

6.  Communication with close and distant relatives in the context of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in cancer patients.

Authors:  Erna Claes; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Andrea Boogaerts; Marleen Decruyenaere; Lieve Denayer; Eric Legius
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  Breast cancer survivors' attitudes about communication of breast cancer risk to their children.

Authors:  Susan Miesfeldt; Wendy F Cohn; Susan M Jones; Mary E Ropka; Jenine C Weinstein
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.908

8.  Experiences of genetic risk: disclosure and the gendering of responsibility.

Authors:  L d'Agincourt-Canning
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.898

9.  The effect of BRCA gene testing on family relationships: A thematic analysis of qualitative interviews.

Authors:  Heather A Douglas; Rebekah J Hamilton; Robin E Grubs
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Genetic testing for women previously diagnosed with breast/ovarian cancer: examining the impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation searching.

Authors:  N Hallowell; C Foster; A Ardern-Jones; R Eeles; V Murday; M Watson
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2002
View more
  7 in total

1.  Families' experience of oncogenetic counselling: accounts from a heterogeneous hereditary cancer risk population.

Authors:  Álvaro Mendes; Liliana Sousa
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Family communication following BRCA1/2 genetic testing: a close look at the process.

Authors:  Darquise Lafrenière; Karine Bouchard; Béatrice Godard; Jacques Simard; Michel Dorval
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Communication about Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia: Perspective of Filipino Families.

Authors:  Peter James B Abad; Cora A Anonuevo; Sandra Daack-Hirsch; Lorna R Abad; Carmencita D Padilla; Mercy Y Laurino
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  A systematic review of theory-informed strategies used in interventions fostering family genetic risk communication.

Authors:  Jingsong Zhao; Yue Guan; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2022-03-11

5.  Accuracy of recall of information about a cancer-predisposing BRCA1/2 gene mutation among patients and relatives.

Authors:  Chris Jacobs; Caroline Dancyger; Jonathan A Smith; Susan Michie
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Public support for healthcare-mediated disclosure of hereditary cancer risk information: Results from a population-based survey in Sweden.

Authors:  Andreas Andersson; Carolina Hawranek; Anna Öfverholm; Hans Ehrencrona; Kalle Grill; Senada Hajdarevic; Beatrice Melin; Emma Tham; Barbro Numan Hellquist; Anna Rosén
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.857

7.  Breast Cancer Risk Perceptions among Relatives of Women with Uninformative Negative BRCA1/2 Test Results: The Moderating Effect of the Amount of Shared Information.

Authors:  Deborah O Himes; Margaret F Clayton; Gary W Donaldson; Lee Ellington; Saundra S Buys; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.537

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.