Literature DB >> 7393502

Risk, antepartum care, and outcome: impact of a maternity and infant care project.

R J Sokol, R B Woolf, M G Rosen, K Weingarden.   

Abstract

A Title V Maternity and Infant Care (M&I) Project has been operating from Cleveland Metropolitan General Hospital for more than 13 years. To evaluate the effectiveness of its program of antepartum care, social and medical-obstetric risk factors and perinatal outcome were evaluated for pregnant women delivered during a 2-year period. After the potential biases of patient referral and failure to obtain antepartum care were excluded, patients who received either M&I or non-M&I care were compared. Despite the similar social and antepartum/intrapartum risk of these groups, the M&I patients experienced 60% less perinatal mortality than the non-M&I group (P less than .0001). These results suggest that M&I antepartum care is of considerable value, possibly ameliorating the risks for preterm delivery. M&I patients receive more patient education, nutrition counseling, social service assessment and intervention, special services for adolescents, and delinquent appointment follow-up. Thus, this study further suggests that these components of antepartum care may be important in producing the observed improvement in fetal-infant outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7393502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  15 in total

1.  The effect of expanding Medicaid prenatal services on birth outcomes.

Authors:  L M Baldwin; E H Larson; F A Connell; D Nordlund; K C Cain; M L Cawthon; P Byrns; R A Rosenblatt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Identification of factors associated with delayed antenatal care.

Authors:  C L Joseph
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Why we know so little about prenatal care nationwide: an assessment of required methodology.

Authors:  M D Peoples-Sheps; W D Kalsbeek; E Siegel
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  A controlled evaluation of rural regional perinatal care: impact on mortality and morbidity.

Authors:  E Siegel; D Gillings; S Campbell; P Guild
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M S Kramer
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.408

6.  Can prenatal care impact future well-child visits? The experience of a low income population in New York State Medicaid managed care.

Authors:  Lindsay W Cogan; Raina E Josberger; Foster C Gesten; Patrick J Roohan
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-01

7.  Factors associated with birthweight: an exploration of the roles of prenatal care and length of gestation.

Authors:  J A Showstack; P P Budetti; D Minkler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Evaluation of the effects of the North Carolina Improved Pregnancy Outcome Project: implications for state-level decision-making.

Authors:  M D Peoples; R C Grimson; G L Daughtry
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  A comparison of low birth weight among Medicaid patients of public health departments and other providers of prenatal care in North Carolina and Kentucky.

Authors:  P A Buescher; N I Ward
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 10.  Reducing stillbirths: behavioural and nutritional interventions before and during pregnancy.

Authors:  Mohammad Yawar Yakoob; Esme V Menezes; Tanya Soomro; Rachel A Haws; Gary L Darmstadt; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.