Literature DB >> 9584033

Obstetric care and payment source: do low-risk Medicaid women get less care?

S Dobie1, L G Hart, M Fordyce, C H Andrilla, R A Rosenblatt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examined whether Medicaid-insured women at low risk receive less adequate obstetrical care than privately insured women.
METHODS: Low-risk women who were cared for by a random sample of obstetrical providers in Washington State were randomly selected. Information on all prenatal and intrapartum services was abstracted from medical records. Service information was aggregated into standardized resource-use units. Results compared Medicaid-insured women with those who were privately insured.
RESULTS: Medicaid-insured women were significantly younger (22.5 years vs 26.9 years) and averaged 6% fewer visits than privately insured women. Nonetheless, Medicaid status had no meaningful association with prenatal, intrapartum, or overall resource use. Some variation occurred in individual resources received. Medicaid-insured women had 38.8% more resources expended on testing for sexually transmitted diseases. Privately insured women had more resources expended on alpha-fetoprotein testing and on amniocentesis. There were no meaningful differences in birthweight or gestational age at delivery.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study of women who entered obstetrical care at low risk, similar care and resources were expended on Medicaid-insured and on privately insured women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9584033      PMCID: PMC1508388          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.88.1.51

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  19 in total

1.  Differences in hospital resource allocation among sick newborns according to insurance coverage.

Authors:  P A Braveman; S Egerter; T Bennett; J Showstack
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  A comparison of birth outcomes by payment source.

Authors:  S E Mullett; B J Leonard; C N Oberg; B Lia-Hoagberg
Journal:  Minn Med       Date:  1988-06

3.  Social class indicators and mortality in low birth weight infants.

Authors:  N Paneth; S Wallenstein; J L Kiely; M Susser
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Prepaid versus traditional Medicaid plans: lack of effect on pregnancy outcomes and prenatal care.

Authors:  T S Carey; K Weis; C Homer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Birth weight-specific causes of infant mortality, United States, 1980.

Authors:  J W Buehler; L T Strauss; C J Hogue; J C Smith
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Racial differences in low birth weight. Trends and risk factors.

Authors:  J C Kleinman; S S Kessel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-09-17       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Access to obstetric care in rural areas: effect on birth outcomes.

Authors:  T S Nesbitt; F A Connell; L G Hart; R A Rosenblatt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Risk status and pregnancy outcome among medicaid recipients.

Authors:  B Schwethelm; L H Margolis; C Miller; S Smith
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  The relationship of prenatal care and pregnancy complications to birthweight in Winnipeg, Canada.

Authors:  C A Mustard; N P Roos
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Effects of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program on physician practice.

Authors:  J Kosecoff; D E Kanouse; W H Rogers; L McCloskey; C M Winslow; R H Brook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-11-20       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  7 in total

1.  Problems in recruiting community-based physicians for health services research.

Authors:  S Asch; S E Connor; E G Hamilton; S A Fox
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Quality of care for women undergoing a hysterectomy: effects of insurance and race/ethnicity.

Authors:  Rosemarie B Hakim; M Beth Benedict; Nancy J Merrick
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Medicaid and preterm births in Virginia: an analysis of recent outcomes.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Anum; Sheldon M Retchin; Sheryl L Garland; Jerome F Strauss
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Awareness and attitudes regarding prenatal testing among Texas women of childbearing age.

Authors:  Amy P Case; Tunu A Ramadhani; Mark A Canfield; Catherine A Wicklund
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Medicaid and preterm birth and low birth weight: the last two decades.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Anum; Sheldon M Retchin; Jerome F Strauss
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Mortality from breast carcinoma among US women: the role and implications of socio-economics, heterogeneous insurance, screening mammography, and geography.

Authors:  Albert A Okunade; Mustafa C Karakus
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2003-11

7.  Perceptions about prenatal care: views of urban vulnerable groups.

Authors:  Renee Milligan; Barbara K Wingrove; Leslie Richards; Margaret Rodan; Lillie Monroe-Lord; Velishie Jackson; Barbara Hatcher; Cynthia Harris; Cassandra Henderson; Allan A Johnson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2002-11-06       Impact factor: 3.295

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.