Literature DB >> 21369724

Extent of documented adherence to recommended prenatal care content: provider site differences and effect on outcomes among low-income women.

Arden Handler1, Kristin Rankin, Deborah Rosenberg, Karabi Sinha.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between prenatal care (PNC) provider site and the extent of documented adherence to recommended PNC content, and the relationship between adherence to recommended PNC content and adverse pregnancy outcomes among women in Illinois' Medical Assistance Program (MA). Utilizing the medical record, MA claims, and birth certificate data of 374 women who gave birth in 2003 and 2004 in four high-risk communities in Chicago, crude and adjusted analyses of the relationship between provider site and the extent of documented adherence to PNC content, and between adherence to PNC content and the incidence of low birthweight (LBW) and preterm birth (PTB) were conducted. The extent of documented adherence to recommended PNC content was measured from medical records as the percentage of 19 components of standard obstetrical practice that were delivered during pregnancy, converted to a three level categorical variable (low 50%, medium 50-79% and high 80% or greater). The majority of women had less than 80% of the recommended PNC content documented in their medical records. Among high-risk women, a greater proportion of women served by hospitals received care in which the extent of documented adherence was high (≥80%) compared to women served by physicians'offices (P < 0.05). Among low-risk women, a greater proportion of women served by FQHCs received care in which the extent of documented adherence was high compared to women served by hospitals (P < 0.10). Lower adherence to PNC content was significantly associated with LBW and PTB among women receiving prenatal care from physicians. Examination of the extent of adherence to recommended PNC content and its relationship to adverse pregnancy outcomes provides valuable data to inform potential interventions. In particular, a relationship between adherence to recommended PNC content and LBW and PTB among women receiving PNC at physicians' offices suggests the importance of increased quality assurance and provider education efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21369724     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-011-0763-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  33 in total

1.  Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: history, challenges, and directions for future research.

Authors:  G R Alexander; M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  The relationship between prenatal health behavior advice and low birth weight.

Authors:  M R Sable; A A Herman
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  The quality of antenatal care in Turkey and the role of ultrasonography in the antenatal care system.

Authors:  Süleyman Engin Akhan; Gülengül Nadirgil; Ayşegül Tecer; Atil Yüksel
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2002-08-10       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  The content of prenatal care and its relationship to preterm birth in Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Deborah E White; Nonie J Fraser-Lee; Suzanne Tough; Christine V Newburn-Cook
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2006-10

5.  Differences between black and white women in the use of prenatal care technologies.

Authors:  K M Brett; K C Schoendorf; J L Kiely
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  An evaluation of the Kessner Adequacy of Prenatal Care Index and a proposed Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index.

Authors:  M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  An outcome evaluation of the content and quality of prenatal care.

Authors:  D B Petitti; R A Hiatt; V Chin; M Croughan-Minihane
Journal:  Birth       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.689

8.  Receipt of recommended prenatal interventions and birth weight among African-American women: analysis of data from the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey.

Authors:  M T Covington; R J Rice
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1997-09

9.  Improving pregnancy outcomes: public versus private care for urban, low-income women.

Authors:  A Handler; D Rosenberg
Journal:  Birth       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.689

10.  Comparing mothers' reports on the content of prenatal care received with recommended national guidelines for care.

Authors:  M D Kogan; G R Alexander; M Kotelchuck; D A Nagey; B W Jack
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

View more
  17 in total

1.  Measuring antenatal care use in Europe: is the content and timing of care in pregnancy tool applicable?

Authors:  Katrien Beeckman; Lucy Frith; Helga Gottfreðsdóttir; Annette Bernloehr
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  A Call to Revisit the Prenatal Period as a Focus for Action Within the Reproductive and Perinatal Care Continuum.

Authors:  Arden Handler; Kay Johnson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-11

3.  Provider adherence to recommended prenatal care content: does it differ for obese women?

Authors:  Michelle A Kominiarek; Kristin Rankin; Arden Handler
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-07

4.  Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: psychometric testing in an Australia population.

Authors:  Wendy Sword; Maureen Heaman; Mary Anne Biro; Caroline Homer; Jane Yelland; Noori Akhtar-Danesh; Amanda Bradford-Janke
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Assessing the Extent of Adherence to the Recommended Antenatal Care Content in Malaysia: Room for Improvement.

Authors:  Ping Ling Yeoh; Klaus Hornetz; Nor Izzah Ahmad Shauki; Maznah Dahlui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The association between timing of initiation of antenatal care and stillbirths: a retrospective cohort study of pregnant women in Cape Town, South Africa.

Authors:  Roxanne Beauclair; Greg Petro; Landon Myer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Documentation of guideline adherence in antenatal records across maternal weight categories: a chart review.

Authors:  Sarah D McDonald; Clea A Machold; Laura Marshall; Dawn Kingston
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Predictors of Women's Satisfaction with Prenatal Care in a Canadian Setting.

Authors:  Patricia A Gregory; Maureen I Heaman; Javier Mignone; Michael E Moffatt
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2020-02

9.  Current status of antenatal care of pregnant women-8 provinces in China, 2018.

Authors:  Wenling Hu; Huanqing Hu; Wei Zhao; Aiqun Huang; Qi Yang; Jiangli Di
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing.

Authors:  Maureen I Heaman; Wendy A Sword; Noori Akhtar-Danesh; Amanda Bradford; Suzanne Tough; Patricia A Janssen; David C Young; Dawn A Kingston; Eileen K Hutton; Michael E Helewa
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.