| Literature DB >> 17367521 |
Dorothy E Grice1, Ilkka Reenilä, Pekka T Männistö, Andrew I Brooks, George G Smith, Greg T Golden, Joseph D Buxbaum, Wade H Berrettini.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The mouse C57BL/6 (C57) and DBA/2J (DBA) inbred strains differ substantially in many aspects of their response to drugs of abuse. The development of microarray analyses represents a genome-wide method for measuring differences across strains, focusing on expression differences. In the current study, we carried out microarray analysis in C57 and DBA mice in the nucleus accumbens of drug-naïve and morphine-treated animals.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17367521 PMCID: PMC1851712 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-76
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
QPCR validation analysis of select neuronal mRNAs.
| C57 Control | C57 Morphine | DBA Control | DBA Morphine | |
| Arpc5*+! | 1.00 0.13 | 1.42 ± 0.19 | 5.48 ± 0.38 | 13.61 ± 0.23 |
| Comt* | 1.00 ± 0.09 | 1.68 ± 0.39 | 0.71 ± 0.20 | 0.64 ± 0.05 |
| Gabra2 | 1.00 ± 0.20 | 2.38 ± 0.34 | 3.99 ± 0.40 | 2.67 ± 0.62 |
| Gnb1* | 1.00 ± 0.10 | 1.46 ± 0.36 | 7.85 ± 0.22 | 12.13 ± 0.12 |
| Nab2! | 1.00 ± 0.10 | 1.28 ± 0.33 | 1.25 ± 0.36 | 0.41 ± 0.05 |
| Pde9a* | 1.00 ± 0.05 | 1.03 ± 0.06 | 2.04 ± 0.41 | 2.66 ± 0.31 |
| Pitpnb* | 1.00 ± 0.07 | 0.94 ± 0.05 | 0.34 ± 0.42 | 0.37 ± 0.15 |
| Rcn+! | 1.00 ± 0.03 | 6.18 ± 0.92 | 3.27 ± 0.81 | 1.47 ± 0.27 |
| Sgne1* | 1.00 ± 0.12 | 0.99 ± 0.07 | 3.88 ± 0.32 | 2.59 ± 0.19 |
Nucleus accumbens (NAC) from vehicle or morphine (4 d) treated C57 or DBA mice were dissected and used for QPCR analysis. Eight neuronal mRNAs are profiled above, showing for each mRNAs the expression in C57 control, C57 with morphine, DBA control, and DBA with morphine, always normalized to the average expression in C57 control. Data represent means ± SEM of expression normalized to the average expression in C57 under control conditions. *, P < 0.05 for main effect of strain; +, P < 0.05 for main effect of treatment; !, P < 0.05 for interaction.
Figure 1Correlation of brain Comt and Gnb1 expression with morphine efficacy. Comt and Gnb1 expression in BXD RI strains were correlated with the slope of the morphine dose-response curve (a, n = 23) (derived from [51]), with the analgesia observed with 16 mg/kg of morphine (b, n = 22) (analgesia is expressed as percent of maximum effect and is derived from Fig. 1 of [52]), or with morphine consumption in a two-bottle choice study (c, n = 22) [53] in the BXD RI strains. All expression and behavioural data can be found on the WebQTL database [13]. Comt expression was assessed using the single associated probe set (98535_at), while Gnb1 expression was assessed using probe set 94854_g_at. Rank order correlations were: Top, -0.535, P = 0.0076; middle, -0.470, P = 0.026; and, bottom, -0.586, P = 0.0035.
Figure 2Enzymatic assay of Comt activity in DBA and C57 strains. Nucleus accumbens (NAC), amygdala (AMY), and frontal cortex (FC) were dissected from DBA and C57 mice, and Comt activity was determined in homogenates, as described in the methods. *, P = 0.01; **, P = 0.002.