| Literature DB >> 17205118 |
Elin Lehrmann1, Carlo Colantuoni, Amy Deep-Soboslay, Kevin G Becker, Ross Lowe, Marilyn A Huestis, Thomas M Hyde, Joel E Kleinman, William J Freed.
Abstract
A major goal of drug abuse research is to identify and understand drug-induced changes in brain function that are common to many or all drugs of abuse. As these may underlie drug dependence and addiction, the purpose of the present study was to examine if different drugs of abuse effect changes in gene expression that converge in common molecular pathways. Microarray analysis was employed to assay brain gene expression in postmortem anterior prefrontal cortex (aPFC) from 42 human cocaine, cannabis and/or phencyclidine abuse cases and 30 control cases, which were characterized by toxicology and drug abuse history. Common transcriptional changes were demonstrated for a majority of drug abuse cases (N = 34), representing a number of consistently changed functional classes: Calmodulin-related transcripts (CALM1, CALM2, CAMK2B) were decreased, while transcripts related to cholesterol biosynthesis and trafficking (FDFT1, APOL2, SCARB1), and Golgi/endoplasmic reticulum (ER) functions (SEMA3B, GCC1) were all increased. Quantitative PCR validated decreases in calmodulin 2 (CALM2) mRNA and increases in apolipoprotein L, 2 (APOL2) and semaphorin 3B (SEMA3B) mRNA for individual cases. A comparison between control cases with and without cardiovascular disease and elevated body mass index indicated that these changes were not due to general cellular and metabolic stress, but appeared specific to the use of drugs. Therefore, humans who abused cocaine, cannabis and/or phencyclidine share a decrease in transcription of calmodulin-related genes and increased transcription related to lipid/cholesterol and Golgi/ER function. These changes represent common molecular features of drug abuse, which may underlie changes in synaptic function and plasticity that could have important ramifications for decision-making capabilities in drug abusers.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 17205118 PMCID: PMC1762434 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Summary of the demographic information for drug abuse (42) and control cases (30).
| Factor | Drug abuse cases | Control cases |
|
|
| 6.72±0.24 | 6.68±0.19 |
|
|
| 25.05±13.72 | 24.85±7.74 |
|
|
| 31.05±11.09 | 31.90±8.17 |
|
|
| 16.7% F, 83.3% M | 13.7% F, 86.3% M |
|
|
| 38.1% NS, 61.9% S | 51.8% NS, 48.2% S |
|
|
| 0% A | 1.2% A |
|
| 85.7% AA | 60.7% AA | (AA | |
| 9.5% CAUC | 28.6% CAUC | ||
| 4.8% HISP | 9.5% HISP |
Each drug abuse case was matched to four control cases (Supporting Information, Table 4) by brain pH, postmortem interval (PMI, hours), age (years), gender (F – female, M – male), nicotine use (NS – non-smoker, S - smoker) and ethnicity (A - Asian, AA – African-American, CAUC – Caucasian, HISP – Hispanic). Means shown are derived from the averages of the four controls matched to each individual drug abuse case. P-values were derived using either a *t-test (two-tailed) or **Fisher's Exact Test (two-tailed). For the latter test, data for each control was entered corresponding to the total number of times the control was used.
Toxicological evaluation.
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | cTHC 1.50 |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.06 | COC 1.77, cTHC 0.49 |
|
| - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.10 | COC 0.70, (cTHC) |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.07 | (COC) |
|
|
| 808 | 426 |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.01 | (COC) |
|
| 271 | 390 |
|
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.03 | N/A |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | PCP | - | - | - | 0.26 | N/A |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | cTHC | - | - | - | COC 0.58, cTHC 3.19 |
|
| - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.02 | N.D. |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | cTHC | - | - | - | COC >20.0, PCP 1.81, (cTHC) |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | THC | - | - | - | COC 0.81, cTHC >1.60 |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.19 | N/A |
|
| 145 | 577 | 371 |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.19 | COC >20.0 |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | THC, cTHC | - | - | 0.01 | N/A |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A |
|
| 107 | 154 |
| - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.29 | N/A |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | THC, cTHC | - | - | 0.08 | cTHC 4.10 |
|
| 1377 | 397 |
|
|
| - | - | - | - | cTHC | - | - | 0.06 | COC4.85, cTHC 1.60 |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | THC | - | - | - | N/A |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | PCP | - | - | - | 0.05 | N/A |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 333 | - | - | - | COD | - | N/A |
|
| - | 654 |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | MOR, MTD | COD | - | COC 1.80 |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.12 | COC 0.45 |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | THC, cTHC | - | - | - | COC 0.03, cTHC 0.42 |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | THC, cTHC | - | - | - | COC 8.04, PCP 0.32, cTHC 2.55 |
|
| 774 | 524 |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | PCP | THC | - | - | - | COC 3.53, PCP 2.94, cTHC 0.64 |
|
| 1103 | 413 | 549 | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | COC 3.71, MOR 0.12, 6AM 0.12 |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | THC, cTHC | - | - | 0.07 | COC 7.18, PCP 1.53, cTHC >5.0 |
|
| 248 | 465 |
|
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.04 | COC >20.0, cTHC 0.29 |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | COC 9.39, cTHC 1.12 |
|
| - | 688 | 438 |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.03 | (COC) |
|
| - | 2940 |
| - | - | - | 88 | - | - | - | MOR | - | - | COC 14.3, MOR 2.12, 6AM 0.39, COD 0.85, OXYC 0.07 |
|
| - | 425 |
| - | - | - | 126 | - | - | - | MOR | - | - | COC 19.90, MOR 5.72, 6AM 1.01, COD 0.61 |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | PCP | - | - | - | - | cTHC 0.94 |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | COC 0.56, MOR 0.06, 6AM 0.45 |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | THC, cTHC | - | - | - | COC 1.23, cTHC 2.15 |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | cTHC 1.02 |
|
| - | 49 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | N/A |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.26 | NEG |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (OPIOIDS) |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | COC 1.23, PCP 0.15, cTHC >5.0, MDMA 0.75 |
A separate GC/MS-based toxicology (NIDA) examined the presence (pg/mg) of cocaine, amphetamine, phencyclidine, opioids and their metabolites [18] in cerebellum from drug abuse (DA) cases DA1–42. Cocaine and cocaine metabolites outlined in bold typeface were exclusively detected by this toxicological examination. All cerebellar samples tested negative for amphetamines and 6AM. The “Other general toxicology data” column represents several sources and matrices (blood, brain, urine, vitreous humor), and data are represented as present (name of substance or parent substance) or absent (-). Blood alcohol levels (g/dL, g%) were available for all cases and are indicated if present. Scalp hair testing (Psychemedics Corp.) examined the presence of cocaine (ng/mg), phencyclidine (ng/mg), amphetamines (ng/mg), opioids (ng/mg) and cannabis (pg/mg). Abbreviations: 6AM – 6-acetyl morphine, AEME – anhydroecgonine methyl ester, BE - benzoylecgonine, CE – cocaethylene, COC – cocaine, COD - codeine, cTHC – 11-nor-9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol, EEE – ecgonine ethyl ester, EME – ecgonine methyl ester, EtOH – alcohol, MDMA – N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (Ecstasy), MOR – morphine, MTD – methadone, N/A – not available, OXYC – oxycodone, PCP – phencyclidine, THC – delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol.
Figure 1Hierarchical clustering identified three main groups of drug abuse cases.
Hierarchical clustering of individual transcriptional profiles from comparisons of drug abuse cases and their individual four best-matched controls identified three main groups of drug abusers: Group I (DA1–18), Group II (DA19–34) and Group III (DA35–42). A summary of toxicology and drug abuse history for each case in the clustering dendrogram indicated cocaine use in a majority of cases, while presence of alcohol in Group I, and opioids and phencyclidine in Group II might underlie differences in Group I and II individuals. Group III cases differed markedly from other cases, which may be related to the absence or low levels of abused drug in most cases, a history of alcohol dependence, or to underlying medical conditions. Insufficient specimen for quantitative analysis of a positive hair test screening is indicated by a parenthesis around the substance name, units are ng/mg, except for cTHC (pg/mg). Abbreviations: 6AM – 6-acetyl morphine, AEME – anhydroecgonine methyl ester, BE - benzoylecgonine, CE – cocaethylene, COC – cocaine, COD - codeine, cTHC – 11-nor-9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol, EEE – ecgonine ethyl ester, EME – ecgonine methyl ester, EtOH – alcohol, g% - g/dL, MDMA – N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (Ecstasy), MOR – morphine, MTD – methadone, N/A – not available, OXYC – oxycodone, PCP – phencyclidine, THC – delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol.
Significantly regulated transcripts identify three functional groups as shared across cocaine, cannabis and phencyclidine abuse cases.
| EG SYMBOL | ACCESSION | LOCALIZATION AND FUNCTION | GAPs: ALL | COC+ | THC+ | PCP+ |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| S100A16 | BC019099 | Calcium-binding protein | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
|
|
| THTPA | BC002984 | Phosphatase, cAMP biosynthesis, AC activity | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
|
|
| CAMK2B | BC019070 | Synaptic function and plasticity, calmodulin-modulated | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
|
|
| CALM1 | BC000454 | Synaptic function and plasticity | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.17 | 0.04 |
|
|
| CALM2 | BC018677 | Synaptic function and plasticity | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.01 |
|
|
| CALM2 | BC017385 | Synaptic function and plasticity | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.13 | 0.01 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| AAK1 | BC002695 | Golgi/PM, CC AP2-associated kinase | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.98 |
|
|
| AP1M2 | BC005021 | Golgi/PM, clathrin-coat (CC) adaptor protein 1 (AP1) | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.97 |
|
|
| AP2A1 | BC014214 | Golgi/PM, CC AP2 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.97 |
|
|
| AP4B1 | BC014146 | Golgi/PM, CC AP4 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.94 |
|
|
| FLOT1 | BC001146 | Lipid raft/caveola-associated, endocytosis (non-CC) | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 0.00 |
|
|
| RIMBP2 | BC007632 | Golgi, synaptic active zone, Rab3-IM-BP | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.13 | 0.00 |
|
|
| RAB9A | BC017265 | Late endosome/lysosome, GTPase, vesicular trafficking | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.01 |
|
|
| ASGR2 | BC017251 | Vesicular transport, Galact-term glycoproteins (lysosome) | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
|
|
| ARL6IP4 | BC015569 | Nuclear, ARL6 GTP-binding IP, vesicular trafficking | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.00 |
|
|
| NCLN | BC019091 | ER, TGFbeta superfamily signal transduction | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
|
|
| YIPF5 | BC007829 | Golgi/ER, Rab GTPase | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.94 | 0.99 |
|
|
| GCC1 | BC014100 | Golgi (TGN) | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.98 |
|
|
| COG4 | BC013347 | Golgi, retention and retrieval of Golgi proteins | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.98 |
|
|
| COPZ1 | BC002849 | ER-Golgi transport, non-CC vesicle coat | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.98 |
|
|
| CTSD | BC016320 | Lysosome, aspartyl protease | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.99 |
|
|
| DPP7 | BC011907 | Lysosome, peptidase | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 1.00 |
|
|
| CPVL | BC016838 | ER, peptidase | 0.94 | 0.99 | 0.84 | 0.99 |
|
|
| LEPREL1 | BC005029 | ER/Golgi, protein metabolism | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.86 | 0.97 |
|
|
| SEMA3B | BC013975 | ER, growth cone guidance | 0.95 | 0.99 | 0.87 | 0.97 |
|
|
| CRMP1 | BC007898 | Semaphorin signal transduction pathway | 0.91 | 0.99 | 0.71 | 0.94 |
|
|
| VPS37C | BC005805 | Endosome, sorting ubiquinated transmembrane proteins | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.97 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| APOL1 | BC017331 | HDL complex, cholesterol trafficking, secreted | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.02 |
|
|
| APOL2 | BC004395 | HDL complex, cholesterol trafficking, cytoplasmic | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.91 | 0.94 |
|
|
| SCARB1 | NM_005505 | HDL receptor | 0.93 | 0.99 | 0.83 | 0.99 |
|
|
| FDFT1 | BC003573 | ER, first step in cholesterol biosynthesis | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.99 |
|
|
| PRKAB1 | BC001823 | Cell energy homeostasis, fatty acid biosynthesis | 0.91 | 0.99 | 0.83 | 0.98 |
|
|
| LASS4 | BC009828 | ER, Ceramide synthesis | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.90 | 0.98 |
|
|
| PTGES | BC018201 | Prostaglandin metabolism | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.98 |
|
|
| ZDHHC1 | BC021908 | Palmitoyl transferase | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.98 |
|
|
| ZDHHC8 | BC009442 | Palmitoyl transferase | 0.93 | 0.99 | 0.83 | 1.00 |
|
|
| PHLDB1 | BC013031 | PtdIns(3,4,5)P(3) binding, postsynaptic membrane | 0.95 | 0.99 | 0.88 | 0.97 |
|
|
| PXMP4 | BC001147 | Peroxisomal membrane protein, lipid metabolism | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.96 |
|
|
| ECHDC1 | BC003549 | Peroxisomal oxidation of fatty acids | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.00 |
|
|
Thirty-nine significantly regulated transcripts belonged to three distinct functional groups: calmodulin-related signaling, Golgi/ER-related transcripts and lipid/cholesterol metabolism. Group average p-values (GAPs, two-tailed z-test) are indicated for all 34 drug abuse cases (ALL), and for the three main groups of cases sorted according to the drugs present at the time of death: cocaine (COC+, N = 12), cannabis (THC+, N = 9) and phencyclidine (PCP+, N = 3). While factors such as brain pH, postmortem interval, gender or smoking history were all well-matched, ethnicity was the only demographic variable that differed between groups ( ). To address this issue, we examined only the six African-American male (AAM) drug abuse cases (18% of all drug abuse cases) that had been individually matched to four AAM controls. Of the 39 transcripts that were significantly regulated (ALL and COC+, THC+ and/or PCP+ columns), 37 remained similarly regulated for the AAM group. There were only two transcripts, NCLN (*) and PRKAB1 (**) for which the results were different for the AAM subgroup (see text). Therefore, as a factor in matching, ethnicity had little effect on the identification of significantly regulated transcripts. Controls with cardiovascular disease (CVDC) and elevated body mass index ( ) did not demonstrate changes in gene expression which were similar to those of the drug abuse cases. Table S2 contains the full list of transcripts. Gene symbols were annotated using GenBank Accession numbers and EntrezGene.
Figure 2Venn Diagrams illustrating the distribution of significantly altered transcripts in groups defined by global expression profiles (A) or by drugs of abuse (B).
A. Eighty-nine transcripts were regulated in all three groups defined by global expression profiles. All of these were regulated in the same direction (increased or decreased) for Group I (DA1–18) and Group II (DA19–34), and in the opposite direction for Group III (DA35–42) cases. In all, 201/202 transcripts shared between Group I and Group II were regulated in the same direction. For Group III, 91/115 transcripts shared with Group I and 79/81 transcripts shared with Group II were regulated in the opposite direction. These data highlight the similarities of Group I and Group II, and the marked differences in Group III cases. Each cluster of three arrows indicates the direction of change in Groups I, II and III, respectively. Increased expression is indicated by ↑, a decrease by ↓, while → indicates no significant change. B. Cases with a drug abuse history and positive cocaine, phencyclidine or cannabinoid toxicology in blood, brain or urine were grouped into COC+, PCP+ and THC+ groups, respectively. While there were significant transcriptional differences between these groups, a total of 160 transcripts (≈2% of all transcripts) were shared for the three groups. Note that a much smaller number of transcripts were identified for the THC+ group (264 increased, 424 decreased) than for the COC+ (982 increased, 699 decreased) and PCP+ (911 increased, 1021 decreased) groups. Increased expression is indicated by ↑, decreased expression by ↓.
Figure 3Validation of microarray data by quantitative PCR (QPCR).
Three representatives of consistently changed functional groups (Table 3) were examined by QPCR: calmodulin 2 (CALM2, blue bars), apolipoprotein 2 (APOL2, green bars), and semaphorin 3B (SEMA3B, orange bars). Numbers on the x-axis represents either the microarray-derived fold change (FC, lighter blue, green or orange bars) for each drug abuse case compared to the four best-matched control cases or the QPCR ratio (QPCR, darker blue, green or orange bars), while numbers on the y-axis represent the drug abuse case examined. QPCR validated 32/38 (84%) of the microarray data, which was performed using separate sets of brain dissections and RNA extractions from each drug abuse case and the four individual best-matched controls.