Literature DB >> 17348529

Binaural interference and auditory grouping.

Virginia Best1, Frederick J Gallun, Simon Carlile, Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham.   

Abstract

The phenomenon of binaural interference, where binaural judgments of a high-frequency target stimulus are disrupted by the presence of a simultaneous low-frequency interferer, can largely be explained using principles of auditory grouping and segregation. Evidence for this relationship comes from a number of previous studies showing that the manipulation of simultaneous grouping cues such as harmonicity and onset synchrony can influence the strength of the phenomenon. In this study, it is shown that sequential grouping cues can also influence whether binaural interference occurs. Subjects indicated the lateral position of a high-frequency sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) tone containing an interaural time difference. Perceived lateral positions were reduced by the presence of a simultaneous diotic low-frequency SAM tone, but were largely restored when the interferer was "captured" in a stream of identical tones. A control condition confirmed that the effect was not due to peripheral adaptation. The data lend further support to the idea that binaural interference is affected by processes related to the perceptual organization of auditory information. Modifications to existing grouping-based models are proposed that may help account for binaural interference effects more successfully.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17348529     DOI: 10.1121/1.2407738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  32 in total

1.  Effects of self-motion on auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Hirohito M Kondo; Daniel Pressnitzer; Iwaki Toshima; Makio Kashino
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Spatial cues alone produce inaccurate sound segregation: the effect of interaural time differences.

Authors:  Andrew Schwartz; Josh H McDermott; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Extracting binaural information from simultaneous targets and distractors: effects of amplitude modulation and asynchronous envelopes.

Authors:  Mark A Stellmack; Andrew J Byrne; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Objective and subjective psychophysical measures of auditory stream integration and segregation.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-24

5.  Binaural interference in lateralization thresholds for interaural time and level differences.

Authors:  Laurie M Heller; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Binaural interference in the free field.

Authors:  Naomi B H Croghan; D Wesley Grantham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Dissociation of perceptual judgments of "what" and "where" in an ambiguous auditory scene.

Authors:  Andrew H Schwartz; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effects of Spectral Degradation on Attentional Modulation of Cortical Auditory Responses to Continuous Speech.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Ala Somarowthu; Nai Ding
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-11

9.  Object-based auditory and visual attention.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Localization interference between components in an auditory scene.

Authors:  Adrian K C Lee; Ade Deane-Pratt; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.