Literature DB >> 21117757

Binaural interference in the free field.

Naomi B H Croghan1, D Wesley Grantham.   

Abstract

In an anechoic chamber the minimum audible angle (MAA) was measured in seven normal-hearing adults for a narrow band of noise centered at 4000 Hz (target). In the absence of an interfering stimulus, the average MAA was 2.1°. When a low-frequency interferer (a narrow band of noise centered at 500 Hz) was pulsed on and off with the target from directly in front of the subject, the average MAA was significantly elevated (13.4°). However, if the interferer was continuously present, or if it consisted of two independent noises presented from ±90°, interference was much reduced. The interference effect was asymmetric: a high-frequency interferer did not result in elevation of MAA threshold for a low-frequency target. These results are similar to those that have been extensively reported for stimuli under headphones [Bernstein and Trahiotis (1995). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 155-163]. These data are consistent with the notion that interference from a spectrally remote low-frequency interferer occurs in the free field to the extent that the target and interferer are fused into a single perceptual object. If cues are provided that promote perceptual segregation (such as temporal onset differences or spatial location differences), the interference is reduced or eliminated.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21117757      PMCID: PMC2882666          DOI: 10.1121/1.3311862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  Auditory objects of attention: the role of interaural time differences.

Authors:  C J Darwin; R W Hukin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Perceptual segregation of competing speech sounds: the role of spatial location.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Stuart Gatehouse; Catherine Lever
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Binaural interference in lateralization thresholds for interaural time and level differences.

Authors:  Laurie M Heller; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Lateralization of high frequencies based on interaural time differences.

Authors:  D McFadden; E G Pasanen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Binaural interference and auditory grouping.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Frederick J Gallun; Simon Carlile; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Detectability of interaural delays over select spectral regions: effects of flanking noise.

Authors:  C Trahiotis; L R Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Perceptual separation of concurrent speech sounds: absence of across-frequency grouping by common interaural delay.

Authors:  J F Culling; Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Extents of laterality and binaural interference effects.

Authors:  L M Heller; C Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on interaural discrimination and virtual localization.

Authors:  L Smith-Olinde; J Koehnke; J Besing
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Binaural interference effects measured with masking-level difference and with ITD- and IID-discrimination paradigms.

Authors:  L R Bernstein; C Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  3 in total

1.  Binaural interference in lateralization thresholds for interaural time and level differences.

Authors:  Laurie M Heller; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spectrotemporal weighting of binaural cues: Effects of a diotic interferer on discrimination of dynamic interaural differences.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Bibee; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Localizing the sources of two independent noises: role of time varying amplitude differences.

Authors:  William A Yost; Christopher A Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.