Literature DB >> 17342502

Evaluation of phosphenes elicited by extraocular stimulation in normals and by suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

Takashi Fujikado1, Takeshi Morimoto, Hiroyuki Kanda, Shunji Kusaka, Kazuaki Nakauchi, Motoki Ozawa, Kenji Matsushita, Hirokazu Sakaguchi, Yasushi Ikuno, Motohiro Kamei, Yasuo Tano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To determine the efficient parameters to evoke electrical phosphenes is essential for the development of a retinal prosthesis. We studied the efficient parameters in normal subjects and investigated if suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation (STS) is effective in patients with advanced retinitis pigmentosa (RP) using these efficient parameters.
METHODS: The amplitude of pupillary reflex (PR) evoked by transcorneal electrical stimulation (TcES) was determined at different frequencies in eight normal subjects. The relationship between localized phosphenes elicited by transscleral electrical stimulation (TsES) and the pulse parameters was also examined in six normal subjects. The phosphenes evoked by STS were examined in two patients with RP with bare light perception. Biphasic pulses (cathodic first, duration: 0.5 or 1.0 ms, frequency: 20 Hz) were applied through selected channel(s). The size and shape of the phosphenes perceived by the patients were recorded.
RESULTS: The maximum PR was evoked by TcES with a frequency of 20 Hz. The brightest phosphene was elicited by TsES with a pulse train of more than 10 pulses, duration of 0.5-1.0 ms and a frequency of 20 to 50 Hz. In RP patients, localized phosphenes were elicited with a current of 0.3-0.5 mA (0.5 ms) in patient 1 and 0.4 mA (1.0 ms) in patient 2. Two isolated or dumbbell-shaped phosphenes were perceived when the stimulus was delivered through two adjacent channels.
CONCLUSION: Biphasic pulse trains (> or =10 pulses) with a duration of 0.5-1.0 ms and a frequency of 20-50 Hz were efficient for evoking phosphenes by localized extraocular stimulation in normal subjects. With these parameters, STS is a feasible method to use with a retinal prosthesis even in advanced stages of RPs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17342502     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-007-0563-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  30 in total

Review 1.  Will retinal implants restore vision?

Authors:  Eberhart Zrenner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-02-08       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Evoked cortical potentials after electrical stimulation of the inner retina in rabbits.

Authors:  P Walter; K Heimann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Subretinal electrical stimulation of the rabbit retina.

Authors:  A Y Chow; V Y Chow
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1997-03-28       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  [Distribution of current intensities inside the electrically stimulated eye].

Authors:  M Kawasumi
Journal:  Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1985-06

5.  [Clinical application of EER (electrically evoked response) (2) Analysis of EER in patients with dysfunctional rod or cone visual pathway (author's transl)].

Authors:  Y Miyake; K Yanagida; K Yagasaki
Journal:  Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1980-06-10

6.  Long-term histological and electrophysiological results of an inactive epiretinal electrode array implantation in dogs.

Authors:  A B Majji; M S Humayun; J D Weiland; S Suzuki; S A D'Anna; E de Juan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Transretinal electrical stimulation by an intrascleral multichannel electrode array in rabbit eyes.

Authors:  Kazuaki Nakauchi; Takashi Fujikado; Hiroyuki Kanda; Takeshi Morimoto; Jun S Choi; Yasushi Ikuno; Hirokazu Sakaguchi; Motohiro Kamei; Masahito Ohji; Tohru Yagi; Shigeru Nishimura; Hajime Sawai; Yutaka Fukuda; Yasuo Tano
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  Retinal prosthesis for the blind.

Authors:  Eyal Margalit; Mauricio Maia; James D Weiland; Robert J Greenberg; Gildo Y Fujii; Gustavo Torres; Duke V Piyathaisere; Thomas M O'Hearn; Wentai Liu; Gianluca Lazzi; Gislin Dagnelie; Dean A Scribner; Eugene de Juan; Mark S Humayun
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.048

9.  Retinitis pigmentosa. A symposium on terminology and methods of examination.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with an ultrafine, extracellular microelectrode.

Authors:  Ralph J Jensen; Joseph F Rizzo; Ofer R Ziv; Andrew Grumet; John Wyatt
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  33 in total

1.  Preservation of retinotopic map in retinal degeneration.

Authors:  John Xie; Gene-Jack Wang; Lindy Yow; Mark S Humayun; James D Weiland; Carlos J Cela; Hossein Jadvar; Gianluca Lazzi; Elona Dhrami-Gavazi; Stephen H Tsang
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.467

2.  Task-dependent V1 responses in human retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Yoichiro Masuda; Hiroshi Horiguchi; Serge O Dumoulin; Ayumu Furuta; Satoru Miyauchi; Satoshi Nakadomari; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  [Development of a minimally invasive retinal implant system].

Authors:  H Gerding
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Temporal properties of network-mediated responses to repetitive stimuli are dependent upon retinal ganglion cell type.

Authors:  Maesoon Im; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Biocompatibility and durability of Teflon-coated platinum-iridium wires implanted in the vitreous cavity.

Authors:  Kentaro Nishida; Hirokazu Sakaguchi; Ping Xie; Yasuo Terasawa; Motoki Ozawa; Motohiro Kamei; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 1.731

6.  Indirect activation elicits strong correlations between light and electrical responses in ON but not OFF retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Maesoon Im; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Surgical feasibility and biocompatibility of wide-field dual-array suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation prosthesis in middle-sized animals.

Authors:  Tibor Karl Lohmann; Hiroyuki Kanda; Takeshi Morimoto; Takao Endo; Tomomitsu Miyoshi; Kentaro Nishida; Motohiro Kamei; Peter Walter; Takashi Fujikado
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  Electrical stimulation of cranial nerves in cognition and disease.

Authors:  Devin Adair; Dennis Truong; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Nigel Gebodh; Helen Borges; Libby Ho; J Douglas Bremner; Bashar W Badran; Vitaly Napadow; Vincent P Clark; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-02-23       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Behavior tests and immunohistochemical retinal response analyses in RCS rats with subretinal implantation of Okayama-University-type retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Toshihiko Matsuo; Osamu Hosoya; Kimiko M Tsutsui; Tetsuya Uchida
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 1.731

10.  Transcorneal electrical stimulation improves visual function in eyes with branch retinal artery occlusion.

Authors:  Shinichirou Oono; Takuji Kurimoto; Ryosuke Kashimoto; Yuichi Tagami; Norio Okamoto; Osamu Mimura
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-03-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.