Literature DB >> 15586287

Transretinal electrical stimulation by an intrascleral multichannel electrode array in rabbit eyes.

Kazuaki Nakauchi1, Takashi Fujikado, Hiroyuki Kanda, Takeshi Morimoto, Jun S Choi, Yasushi Ikuno, Hirokazu Sakaguchi, Motohiro Kamei, Masahito Ohji, Tohru Yagi, Shigeru Nishimura, Hajime Sawai, Yutaka Fukuda, Yasuo Tano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A new method of stimulating the retina electrically, called suprachoroidal transretinal stimulation (STS), was shown to be effective in eliciting electrically evoked cortical potentials (EEPs) in Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) rats. Before extending this technique to patients, it is important to determine its safety and feasibility in eliciting EEPs from medium-size animal (rabbits). The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of the surgical procedures used to implant an multichannel electrode array into a scleral pocket, and to determine whether the implanted electrodes can stimulate the retina effectively.
METHODS: These acute experiments were conducted on six rabbits. An array of eight gold microelectrodes, embedded in polyimide, was implanted into a scleral pocket over the visual streak area. The size of the microarray was 2 x 4 x 0.180 mm. The reference electrode was implanted into the vitreous. The electrode array and reference electrodes were connected to a stimulator to deliver monophasic current pulses. Cortical responses were recorded with a stainless steel electrode implanted into each rabbit's skull over the visual cortex. After the experiment, the eyes and electrodes were examined histologically.
RESULTS: The surgical procedures for electrode implantation were accomplished without serious complications. EEPs were recorded after monophasic electrical pulse stimulation from each electrode. The mean threshold for EEPs was 55.0+/-10.0 microA with a 0.5-ms duration inward current pulse. The charge delivered at threshold was about 27.5 nC, and the charge density was about 56.0 microC/cm2. Histopathological examination of the retinal tissue around the area of stimulation did not show damage at the light microscope level with the electrical parameters used.
CONCLUSIONS: Our technique for STS with an intrascleral microelectrode array is safe in rabbit eyes, and EEPs were elicited by current densities that did not induce tissue damage. These results suggest that STS via intrascleral multichannel electrodes is a feasible method for stimulating the retina.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15586287     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-004-1060-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  18 in total

Review 1.  Will retinal implants restore vision?

Authors:  Eberhart Zrenner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-02-08       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Learning retina implants with epiretinal contacts.

Authors:  R Eckmiller
Journal:  Ophthalmic Res       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.892

3.  Evoked cortical potentials after electrical stimulation of the inner retina in rabbits.

Authors:  P Walter; K Heimann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Subretinal electrical stimulation of the rabbit retina.

Authors:  A Y Chow; V Y Chow
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1997-03-28       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Visual field representation in the newborn rabbit's cortex.

Authors:  B P Choudhury
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1978-09-15       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Long-term histological and electrophysiological results of an inactive epiretinal electrode array implantation in dogs.

Authors:  A B Majji; M S Humayun; J D Weiland; S Suzuki; S A D'Anna; E de Juan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Intraocular retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  M S Humayun
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2001

8.  Development of a silicon retinal implant: cortical evoked potentials following focal stimulation of the rabbit retina with light and electricity.

Authors:  M N Nadig
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 9.  Retinal prosthesis for the blind.

Authors:  Eyal Margalit; Mauricio Maia; James D Weiland; Robert J Greenberg; Gildo Y Fujii; Gustavo Torres; Duke V Piyathaisere; Thomas M O'Hearn; Wentai Liu; Gianluca Lazzi; Gislin Dagnelie; Dean A Scribner; Eugene de Juan; Mark S Humayun
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.048

10.  Visual perception elicited by electrical stimulation of retina in blind humans.

Authors:  M S Humayun; E de Juan; G Dagnelie; R J Greenberg; R H Propst; D H Phillips
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-01
View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  A review of in vivo animal studies in retinal prosthesis research.

Authors:  Dimiter R Bertschinger; Evgueny Beknazar; Manuel Simonutti; Avinoam B Safran; José A Sahel; Serge G Rosolen; Serge Picaud; Joel Salzmann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  The development of a multichannel electrode array for retinal prostheses.

Authors:  Yasuo Terasawa; Hiroyuki Tashiro; Akihiro Uehara; Tohru Saitoh; Motoki Ozawa; Takashi Tokuda; Jun Ohta
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 1.731

3.  Biocompatibility and durability of Teflon-coated platinum-iridium wires implanted in the vitreous cavity.

Authors:  Kentaro Nishida; Hirokazu Sakaguchi; Ping Xie; Yasuo Terasawa; Motoki Ozawa; Motohiro Kamei; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 1.731

4.  Evaluation of electrochemically treated bulk electrodes for a retinal prosthesis by examination of retinal intrinsic signals in cats.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kanda; Toshifumi Mihashi; Tomomitsu Miyoshi; Yoko Hirohara; Takeshi Morimoto; Yasuo Terasawa; Takashi Fujikado
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Visual Prosthesis: Artificial Vision.

Authors:  A Banarji; V S Gurunadh; S Patyal; T S Ahluwalia; D P Vats; M Bhadauria
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

6.  Implantation of a newly developed direct optic nerve electrode device for artificial vision in rabbits.

Authors:  Hirokazu Sakaguchi; Motohiro Kamei; Kentaro Nishida; Yasuo Terasawa; Takashi Fujikado; Motoki Ozawa; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-04-07       Impact factor: 1.731

7.  Spatial characteristics of evoked potentials elicited by a MEMS microelectrode array for suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation in a rabbit.

Authors:  Yan Yan; Xiaohong Sui; Wenjia Liu; Yiliang Lu; Pengjia Cao; Zengguang Ma; Yao Chen; Xinyu Chai; Liming Li
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Artificial vision by direct optic nerve electrode (AV-DONE) implantation in a blind patient with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Hirokazu Sakaguchi; Motohiro Kamei; Takashi Fujikado; Eiji Yonezawa; Motoki Ozawa; Carmen Cecilia-Gonzalez; Orlando Ustariz-Gonzalez; Hugo Quiroz-Mercado; Yasuo Tano
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 1.731

9.  Evaluation of phosphenes elicited by extraocular stimulation in normals and by suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Takashi Fujikado; Takeshi Morimoto; Hiroyuki Kanda; Shunji Kusaka; Kazuaki Nakauchi; Motoki Ozawa; Kenji Matsushita; Hirokazu Sakaguchi; Yasushi Ikuno; Motohiro Kamei; Yasuo Tano
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 10.  Implantable Microimagers.

Authors:  David C Ng; Takashi Tokuda; Sadao Shiosaka; Yasuo Tano; Jun Ohta
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.