Literature DB >> 17333412

Introduction to grayscale calibration and related aspects of medical imaging grade liquid crystal displays.

Kenneth A Fetterly1, Hartwig R Blume, Michael J Flynn, Ehsan Samei.   

Abstract

Consistent presentation of digital radiographic images at all locations within a medical center can help ensure a high level of patient care. Currently, liquid crystal displays (LCDs) are the electronic display technology of choice for viewing medical images. As the inherent luminance (and thereby perceived contrast) properties of different LCDs can vary substantially, calibration of the luminance response of these displays is required to ensure that observer perception of an image is consistent on all displays. The digital imaging and communication in medicine (DICOM) grayscale standard display function (GSDF) defines the luminance response of a display such that an observer's perception of image contrast is consistent throughout the pixel value range of a displayed image. The main purpose of this work is to review the theoretical and practical aspects of calibration of LCDs to the GSDF. Included herein is a review of LCD technology, principles of calibration, and other practical aspects related to calibration and observer perception of images presented on LCDs. Both grayscale and color displays are considered, and the influence of ambient light on calibration and perception is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17333412      PMCID: PMC3043865          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-007-9022-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  11 in total

Review 1.  On the cause of disability glare and its dependence on glare angle, age and ocular pigmentation.

Authors:  Johannes J Vos
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Angular dependence of the luminance and contrast in medical monochrome liquid crystal displays.

Authors:  Aldo Badano; Michael J Flynn; Sandrine Martin; Jerzy Kanicki
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  High-fidelity electronic display of digital radiographs.

Authors:  M J Flynn; J Kanicki; A Badano; W R Eyler
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Goniometric and conoscopic measurements of angular display contrast for one-, three-, five-, and nine-million-pixel medical liquid crystal displays.

Authors:  Aldo Badano; Dipesh H Fifadara
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  ROC study of four LCD displays under typical medical center lighting conditions.

Authors:  Steve Langer; Ken Fetterly; Jay Mandrekar; Scott Harmsen; Brian Bartholmai; Charles Patton; Alan Bishop; Colin McCannel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Viewing angle performance of medical liquid crystal displays.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Steven L Wright
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Resolution and noise measurements of five CRT and LCD medical displays.

Authors:  Robert S Saunders; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Digital mammography image quality: image display.

Authors:  Eliot Siegel; Elizabeth Krupinski; Ehsan Samei; Michael Flynn; Katherine Andriole; Bradley Erickson; Jerry Thomas; Aldo Badano; J Anthony Seibert; Etta D Pisano
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  A note on disability glare.

Authors:  A J Fisher; A W Christie
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1965-10       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  THE RELATION BETWEEN VISUAL ACUITY AND ILLUMINATION.

Authors:  S Hecht
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1928-01-20       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  15 in total

1.  Observer performance using virtual pathology slides: impact of LCD color reproduction accuracy.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Louis D Silverstein; Syed F Hashmi; Anna R Graham; Ronald S Weinstein; Hans Roehrig
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  8-bit or 11-bit monochrome displays--which image is preferred by the radiologist?

Authors:  Stephan Bender; Kai Lederle; Christel Weiss; Stefan O Schoenberg; Gerald Weisser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  An Evaluation of Performance Characteristics of Primary Display Devices.

Authors:  Ernest U Ekpo; Mark F McEntee
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  ROCView: prototype software for data collection in jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Authors:  J Thompson; P Hogg; S Thompson; D Manning; K Szczepura
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Evaluation of three pneumothorax size quantification methods on digitized chest X-ray films using medical-grade grayscale and consumer-grade color displays.

Authors:  Antonio J Salazar; Diego A Aguirre; Juliana Ocampo; Juan C Camacho; Xavier A Díaz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  DICOM part 14: GSDF-calibrated medical grade monitor vs a DICOM part 14: GSDF-calibrated "commercial off-the-shelf" (COTS) monitor for viewing 8-bit dental images.

Authors:  D J McIlgorm; J P McNulty
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 7.  Radiological interpretation of images displayed on tablet computers: a systematic review.

Authors:  L J Caffery; N R Armfield; A C Smith
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Comparison of medical-grade and calibrated consumer-grade displays for diagnosis of subtle bone fissures.

Authors:  Daniel Pinto Dos Santos; Jonas Welter; Tilman Emrich; Florian Jungmann; Evelyn Dappa; Peter Mildenberger; Roman Kloeckner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Evaluation of low-cost telemammography screening configurations: a comparison with film-screen readings in vulnerable areas.

Authors:  Antonio J Salazar; Javier Romero; Oscar Bernal; Angela Moreno; Sofía Velasco; Xavier Díaz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Prediction of human observer performance in a 2-alternative forced choice low-contrast detection task using channelized Hotelling observer: impact of radiation dose and reconstruction algorithms.

Authors:  Lifeng Yu; Shuai Leng; Lingyun Chen; James M Kofler; Rickey E Carter; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.