Literature DB >> 21127881

8-bit or 11-bit monochrome displays--which image is preferred by the radiologist?

Stephan Bender1, Kai Lederle, Christel Weiss, Stefan O Schoenberg, Gerald Weisser.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Vendors of medical displays promise a better diagnostic performance using 10- or 11-bit instead of 8-bit monochrome displays. We measured the gain of "Just Noticeable Difference" (JND) steps using high grayscale resolutions and evaluated the preference of radiologists regarding different aspects of image quality.
METHODS: The amount of JND steps was measured on a display using 8-, 10- and 11-bit Look Up Tables (LUT). Radiological images were presented simultaneously using an 8-bit and an 11-bit LUT, radiologists where asked to determine the better image presentation regarding quality parameters like sharpness, contrast and detectability of details.
RESULTS: The 10-bit technology realized more than twice the number of JND steps compared to an 8-bit LUT, an 11-bit LUT presented only few additional JND steps. The radiologists did not attest the higher grayscale resolution a better image quality, they regarded the 8-bit technology to show a better sharpness and contrast, although this had no impact on the detectability of details.
CONCLUSIONS: Our measurements confirmed that the higher grayscale resolution results in a more complete visualization of image information. But radiologists partially judged this as a lack of sharpness and contrast and generally preferred the 8-bit display.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21127881     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-2014-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  2 in total

1.  Increasing the number of gray shades in medical display systems--how much is enough?

Authors:  Tom Kimpe; Tom Tuytschaever
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Introduction to grayscale calibration and related aspects of medical imaging grade liquid crystal displays.

Authors:  Kenneth A Fetterly; Hartwig R Blume; Michael J Flynn; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.056

  2 in total
  4 in total

1.  DICOM part 14: GSDF-calibrated medical grade monitor vs a DICOM part 14: GSDF-calibrated "commercial off-the-shelf" (COTS) monitor for viewing 8-bit dental images.

Authors:  D J McIlgorm; J P McNulty
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Comparison of medical-grade and calibrated consumer-grade displays for diagnosis of subtle bone fissures.

Authors:  Daniel Pinto Dos Santos; Jonas Welter; Tilman Emrich; Florian Jungmann; Evelyn Dappa; Peter Mildenberger; Roman Kloeckner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Grey value contrast sensitivity of dental practitioners in function of luminance and age.

Authors:  Wolfgang Jacquet; Roberto G Cleymaet; Peter Bottenberg
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Numerical Evaluation of Image Contrast for Thicker and Thinner Objects among Current Intraoral Digital Imaging Systems.

Authors:  Oyunbat Dashpuntsag; Midori Yoshida; Ryosuke Kasai; Naoki Maeda; Hidehiko Hosoki; Eiichi Honda
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 3.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.