Literature DB >> 17412136

Digital mammography image quality: image display.

Eliot Siegel1, Elizabeth Krupinski, Ehsan Samei, Michael Flynn, Katherine Andriole, Bradley Erickson, Jerry Thomas, Aldo Badano, J Anthony Seibert, Etta D Pisano.   

Abstract

This paper on digital mammography image display is 1 of 3 papers written as part of an intersociety effort to establish image quality standards for digital mammography. The information included in this paper is intended to support the development of an American College of Radiology (ACR) guideline on image quality for digital mammography. The topics of the other 2 papers are digital mammography image acquisition and digital mammography image storage, transmission, and retrieval. The societies represented in compiling this document were the Radiological Society of North America, the ACR, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine, and the Society for Computer Applications in Radiology. These papers describe in detail what is known to improve image quality for digital mammography and make recommendations about how digital mammography should be performed to optimize the visualization of breast cancers using this imaging tool. Through the publication of these papers, the ACR is seeking input from industry, radiologists, and other interested parties on their contents so that the final ACR guideline for digital mammography will represent the consensus of the broader community interested in these topics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17412136     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  7 in total

1.  Introduction to grayscale calibration and related aspects of medical imaging grade liquid crystal displays.

Authors:  Kenneth A Fetterly; Hartwig R Blume; Michael J Flynn; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Issues to consider in converting to digital mammography.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; Margarita Zuley; Janet K Baum; Helga S Marques
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  A preliminary study for exploring the luminance ratio of liquid-crystal displays required for display of radiographs.

Authors:  Shinya Takarabe; Junji Morishita; Hidetake Yabuuchi; Hiroshi Akamine; Noriyuki Hashimoto; Yasuhiko Nakamura; Yoshio Matsuo; Akiko Hattori
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-09-04

4.  ACR-AAPM-SIIM practice guideline for determinants of image quality in digital mammography.

Authors:  Kalpana M Kanal; Elizabeth Krupinski; Eric A Berns; William R Geiser; Andrew Karellas; Martha B Mainiero; Melissa C Martin; Samir B Patel; Daniel L Rubin; Jon D Shepard; Eliot L Siegel; Judith A Wolfman; Tariq A Mian; Mary C Mahoney
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Part 2: Pre-Clinical Assessment of Medical Displays for Regulatory Evaluation.

Authors:  Aldo Badano; Wei-Chung Cheng; Brendan J O'Leary; Kyle J Myers
Journal:  Inf Disp (1975)       Date:  2011-04

6.  Increase in perceived case suspiciousness due to local contrast optimisation in digital screening mammography.

Authors:  Roelant Visser; Wouter J H Veldkamp; David Beijerinck; Petra A M Bun; Jan J M Deurenberg; Mechli W Imhof-Tas; Klaas H Schuur; Miranda M Snoeren; Gerard J den Heeten; Nico Karssemeijer; Mireille J M Broeders
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Breast Positioning during Mammography: Mistakes to be Avoided.

Authors:  Manju Bala Popli; Rahul Teotia; Meenakshi Narang; Hare Krishna
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2014-07-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.