Literature DB >> 22573294

ROCView: prototype software for data collection in jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis.

J Thompson1, P Hogg, S Thompson, D Manning, K Szczepura.   

Abstract

ROCView has been developed as an image display and response capture (IDRC) solution to image display and consistent recording of reader responses in relation to the free-response receiver operating characteristic paradigm. A web-based solution to IDRC for observer response studies allows observations to be completed from any location, assuming that display performance and viewing conditions are consistent with the study being completed. The simplistic functionality of the software allows observations to be completed without supervision. ROCView can display images from multiple modalities, in a randomised order if required. Following registration, observers are prompted to begin their image evaluation. All data are recorded via mouse clicks, one to localise (mark) and one to score confidence (rate) using either an ordinal or continuous rating scale. Up to nine "mark-rating" pairs can be made per image. Unmarked images are given a default score of zero. Upon completion of the study, both true-positive and false-positive reports can be downloaded and adapted for analysis. ROCView has the potential to be a useful tool in the assessment of modality performance difference for a range of imaging methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22573294      PMCID: PMC3487065          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/99497945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  14 in total

1.  Spatial localization accuracy of radiologists in free-response studies: Inferring perceptual FROC curves from mark-rating data.

Authors:  Dev Chakraborty; Hong-Jun Yoon; Claudia Mello-Thoms
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Quasi-continuous and discrete confidence rating scales for observer performance studies: Effects on ROC analysis.

Authors:  Lubomir Hadjiiski; Heang-Ping Chan; Berkman Sahiner; Mark A Helvie; Marilyn A Roubidoux
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Breast screening: PERFORMS identifies key mammographic training needs.

Authors:  H J Scott; A G Gale
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Analysis of location specific observer performance data: validated extensions of the jackknife free-response (JAFROC) method.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Introduction to grayscale calibration and related aspects of medical imaging grade liquid crystal displays.

Authors:  Kenneth A Fetterly; Hartwig R Blume; Michael J Flynn; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 6.  "Binary" and "non-binary" detection tasks: are current performance measures optimal?

Authors:  David Gur; Howard E Rockette; Andriy I Bandos
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  How many readers and cases does one need to conduct an ROC study?

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Validation and statistical power comparison of methods for analyzing free-response observer performance studies.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Agreement of the order of overall performance levels under different reading paradigms.

Authors:  David Gur; Andriy I Bandos; Amy H Klym; Cathy S Cohen; Christiane M Hakim; Lara A Hardesty; Marie A Ganott; Ronald L Perrin; William R Poller; Ratan Shah; Jules H Sumkin; Luisa P Wallace; Howard E Rockette
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 10.  Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve: practical review for radiologists.

Authors:  Seong Ho Park; Jin Mo Goo; Chan-Hee Jo
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2004 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.500

View more
  4 in total

1.  The impact of simulated motion blur on lesion detection performance in full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Ahmed K Abdullah; Judith Kelly; John D Thompson; Claire E Mercer; Rob Aspin; Peter Hogg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  A free-response evaluation determining value in the computed tomography attenuation correction image for revealing pulmonary incidental findings: a phantom study.

Authors:  John D Thompson; Peter Hogg; David J Manning; Katy Szczepura; Dev P Chakraborty
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Effect of reconstruction methods and x-ray tube current-time product on nodule detection in an anthropomorphic thorax phantom: A crossed-modality JAFROC observer study.

Authors:  J D Thompson; D P Chakraborty; K Szczepura; A K Tootell; I Vamvakas; D J Manning; P Hogg
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  The impact of greyscale inversion for nodule detection in an anthropomorphic chest phantom: a free-response observer study.

Authors:  John D Thompson; Nigel B Thomas; David J Manning; Peter Hogg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.039

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.