Literature DB >> 17333069

[Biomechanical consequences of variations in artificial disc positioning. A finite element study on the lumbar spine].

T Zander1, A Rohlmann, B Bock, G Bergmann.   

Abstract

Artificial disc prostheses are becoming more and more attractive for the treatment of degenerative disc diseases using non-fusion techniques. However, the influence of disc position within the intersegmental space on lumbar biomechanics has scarcely been investigated. A validated finite element model of the lumbar spine was used to investigate the effects of non-ideal implant positioning and orientation, which are more likely to occur using ventrolateral approaches. The model predicts, especially for lateral eccentricities, strongly increased lumbar loads. Therefore, great care should be taken in placing the implant in an optimal position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17333069     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-007-1056-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  13 in total

1.  Estimation of muscle forces in the lumbar spine during upper-body inclination.

Authors:  T Zander; A Rohlmann; J Calisse; G Bergmann
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Influence of a follower load on intradiscal pressure and intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  A Rohlmann; S Neller; L Claes; G Bergmann; H J Wilke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  A follower load increases the load-carrying capacity of the lumbar spine in compression.

Authors:  A G Patwardhan; R M Havey; K P Meade; B Lee; B Dunlap
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  The implications of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement.

Authors:  Russel C Huang; Federico P Girardi; Frank P Cammisa; Timothy M Wright
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2003-08

5.  Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters.

Authors:  Eric Berthonnaud; Joannès Dimnet; Pierre Roussouly; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2005-02

6.  Stepwise reduction of functional spinal structures increase vertebral translation and intradiscal pressure.

Authors:  Frank Heuer; Hendrik Schmidt; Lutz Claes; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Facet tropism and interfacet shape in the thoracolumbar vertebrae: characterization and biomechanical interpretation.

Authors:  Youssef Masharawi; Bruce Rothschild; Khalil Salame; Gali Dar; Smadar Peleg; Israel Hershkovitz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Human lumbar vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy.

Authors:  M M Panjabi; V Goel; T Oxland; K Takata; J Duranceau; M Krag; M Price
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Spinal loads after osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated by vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Thomas Zander; Georg Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-26       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Stepwise reduction of functional spinal structures increase range of motion and change lordosis angle.

Authors:  Frank Heuer; Hendrik Schmidt; Zdenek Klezl; Lutz Claes; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  5 in total

1.  Optimal stiffness of a pedicle-screw-based motion preservation implant for the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Thomas Zander; Georg Bergmann; Hadi N Boustani
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [Stiffening effect of a transsacral fusion system for the lumbosacral junction. A probabilistic finite element analysis and sensitivity study].

Authors:  H N Boustani; A Rohlmann; O Abouezzeddine; G Bergmann; T Zander
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  A probabilistic finite element analysis of the stresses in the augmented vertebral body after vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Hadi Nabil Boustani; Georg Bergmann; Thomas Zander
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Flexible non-fusion scoliosis correction systems reduce intervertebral rotation less than rigid implants and allow growth of the spine: a finite element analysis of different features of orthobiom.

Authors:  A Rohlmann; T Zander; N K Burra; G Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Effect of an artificial disc on lumbar spine biomechanics: a probabilistic finite element study.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Anke Mann; Thomas Zander; Georg Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-11-29       Impact factor: 3.134

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.