Literature DB >> 20361339

A probabilistic finite element analysis of the stresses in the augmented vertebral body after vertebroplasty.

Antonius Rohlmann1, Hadi Nabil Boustani, Georg Bergmann, Thomas Zander.   

Abstract

Fractured vertebral bodies are often stabilized by vertebroplasty. Several parameters, including fracture type, cement filling shape, cement volume, elastic moduli of cement, cancellous bone and fractured region, may all affect the stresses in the augmented vertebral body and in bone cement. The aim of this study was to determine numerically the effects of these input parameters on the stresses caused. In a probabilistic finite element study, an osteoligamentous model of the lumbar spine was employed. Seven input parameters were simultaneously and randomly varied within appropriate limits for >110 combinations thereof. The maximum von Mises stresses in cancellous and cortical bone of the treated vertebral body L3 and in bone cement were calculated. The loading cases standing, flexion, extension, lateral bending, axial rotation and walking were simulated. In a subsequent sensitivity analysis, the coefficients of correlation and determination of the input parameters on the von Mises stresses were calculated. The loading case has a strong influence on the maximum von Mises stress. In cancellous bone, the median value of the maximum von Mises stresses for the different input parameter combinations varied between 1.5 (standing) and 4.5 MPa (flexion). The ranges of the stresses are large for all loading cases studied. Depending on the loading case, up to 69% of the maximum stress variation could be explained by the seven input parameters. The fracture shape and the elastic modulus of the fractured region have the highest influence. In cortical bone, the median values of the maximum von Mises stresses varied between 31.1 (standing) and 61.8 MPa (flexion). The seven input parameters could explain up to 80% of the stress variation here. It is the fracture shape, which has always the highest influence on the stress variation. In bone cement, the median value of the maximum von Mises stresses varied between 3.8 (standing) and 12.7 MPa (flexion). Up to 75% of the maximum stress variation in cement could be explained by the seven input parameters. Fracture shape, and the elastic moduli of bone cement and of the fracture region are those input parameters with the highest influence on the stress variation. In the model with no fracture, the maximum von Mises stresses are generally low. The present probabilistic and sensitivity study clearly showed that in vertebroplasty the maximum stresses in the augmented vertebral body and in bone cement depend mainly on the loading case and fracture shape. Elastic moduli of cement, fracture region and cancellous bone as well as cement volume have sometimes a moderate effect while number and symmetry of cement plugs have virtually no effect on the maximum stresses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20361339      PMCID: PMC2989288          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1386-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  44 in total

1.  A follower load increases the load-carrying capacity of the lumbar spine in compression.

Authors:  A G Patwardhan; R M Havey; K P Meade; B Lee; B Dunlap
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Biomechanics of prophylactic vertebral reinforcement.

Authors:  Kay Sun; Michael A K Liebschner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The biomechanical effect of vertebroplasty on the adjacent vertebral body: a finite element study.

Authors:  R K Wilcox
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.617

4.  A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model of lumbar intervertebral joint in torsion.

Authors:  K Ueno; Y K Liu
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Mechanical response of a lumbar motion segment in axial torque alone and combined with compression.

Authors:  A Shirazi-Adl; A M Ahmed; S C Shrivastava
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Cancellous bone Young's modulus variation within the vertebral body of a ligamentous lumbar spine--application of bone adaptive remodeling concepts.

Authors:  V K Goel; S A Ramirez; W Kong; L G Gilbertson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Biomechanical characterization of a biodegradable calcium phosphate hydraulic cement: a comparison with porous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics.

Authors:  M Ikenaga; P Hardouin; J Lemaître; H Andrianjatovo; B Flautre
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1998-04

8.  Spatial relationships between prevalent and incident spine fractures.

Authors:  J W Davis; J S Grove; R D Wasnich; P D Ross
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Role of ligaments and facets in lumbar spinal stability.

Authors:  M Sharma; N A Langrana; J Rodriguez
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries.

Authors:  F Magerl; M Aebi; S D Gertzbein; J Harms; S Nazarian
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  16 in total

1.  Sensitivity studies of pediatric material properties on juvenile lumbar spine responses using finite element analysis.

Authors:  D Davidson Jebaseelan; C Jebaraj; Narayan Yoganandan; S Rajasekaran; Rishi M Kanna
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-04-07       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Parameters that effect spine biomechanics following cervical disc replacement.

Authors:  Vijay K Goel; Ahmad Faizan; Vivek Palepu; Sanghita Bhattacharya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The choice of the femoral center of rotation affects material loss in total knee replacement wear testing - A parametric finite element study of ISO 14243-3.

Authors:  Steven P Mell; Markus A Wimmer; Hannah J Lundberg
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Biomechanical comparison of vertebral augmentation with silicone and PMMA cement and two filling grades.

Authors:  Tobias L Schulte; Alexander Keiler; Felix Riechelmann; Tobias Lange; Werner Schmoelz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  [Biomechanical aspects of vertebral augmentation].

Authors:  H-J Wilke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  White Matter Anisotropy for Impact Simulation and Response Sampling in Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Songbai Ji
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Minimum cement volume for vertebroplasty.

Authors:  David Martinčič; Miha Brojan; Franc Kosel; Darko Štern; Tomaž Vrtovec; Vane Antolič; Rok Vengust
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Biomechanical in vitro comparison of radiofrequency kyphoplasty and balloon kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Gerhard Achatz; Hans-Joachim Riesner; Benedikt Friemert; Raimund Lechner; Nicolas Graf; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Establishment and validation of a T12-L2 3D finite element model for thoracolumbar segments.

Authors:  Hui Lu; Qichuan Zhang; Fan Ding; Qimei Wu; Rong Liu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 4.060

10.  Optimal surgical component alignment minimizes TKR wear - An in silico study with nine alignment parameters.

Authors:  Steven P Mell; Markus A Wimmer; Joshua J Jacobs; Hannah J Lundberg
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2021-10-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.