Literature DB >> 16712856

Stepwise reduction of functional spinal structures increase vertebral translation and intradiscal pressure.

Frank Heuer1, Hendrik Schmidt, Lutz Claes, Hans-Joachim Wilke.   

Abstract

To date, there are only a few studies that provide data to efficiently calibrate finite element models for the spine due to its complexity. In a recent study, we quantified the range of motion rotation and the lordosis angle. This paper provides complementary results regarding two more parameters, intradiscal pressure and vertebral translation. All parameters were obtained as a function of stepwise anatomical reduction, loading direction and magnitude. Eight lumbar spinal segments (L4-5) with a median age of 52 years (38-59 years) and no signs of disc degeneration were used for the in vitro testing. A miniaturized pressure probe was implanted into the nucleus. An ultrasound-based motion-tracking system was employed to record spatial movements of several landmarks on the specimens. The center of L4, the anterior, posterior, left and right point of the lower endplate of L4 were digitized as landmarks and its translation was determined. Specimens were loaded with pure moments (1-10Nm) in the three principal anatomical planes at a loading rate of 1.0 degrees /s. Anatomy was stepwise reduced by cutting different ligaments, facet capsules and joints and removing nucleus. Translation analysis showed that the L4 center point had its largest displacement in sagittal direction and almost none vertically. Removal of the supra- and interspinous, flaval ligaments showed a slight increase and further removal of structures, a higher increase of translation. Axial rotation also was accompanied with L4 to elevate when torsion was applied. This effect was found to be larger with progressing defects. Nucleotomy exhibited the most unstable situation for specimens. Results of the intradiscal pressure indicated a large increase after removing the facet capsules and joints. Furthermore, it was found that intradiscal pressure correlated well with data of range of motion for rotation. Predicting and simulating clinical defects, surgical intervention or treatment methods requires a well performed calibration based on in vitro data, whereas it is important to adapt all including structures with as many known parameters as possible. Results provided by these studies may be used as a database for researchers aiming to calibrate or validate finite element models of L4-5 segments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16712856     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  19 in total

1.  Intraoperative determination of the load–displacement behavior of scoliotic spinal motion segments: preliminary clinical results.

Authors:  Christoph Reutlinger; Carol Hasler; Klaus Scheffler; Philippe Büchler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Biomechanical Comparison of Robotically Applied Pure Moment, Ideal Follower Load, and Novel Trunk Weight Loading Protocols on L4-L5 Cadaveric Segments during Flexion-Extension.

Authors:  Charles R Bennett; Denis J DiAngelo; Brian P Kelly
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

3.  [Biomechanical consequences of variations in artificial disc positioning. A finite element study on the lumbar spine].

Authors:  T Zander; A Rohlmann; B Bock; G Bergmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Biomechanical Properties of Paraspinal Muscles Influence Spinal Loading-A Musculoskeletal Simulation Study.

Authors:  Masoud Malakoutian; C Antonio Sanchez; Stephen H M Brown; John Street; Sidney Fels; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-02

5.  Biomechanical evaluation of three surgical scenarios of posterior lumbar interbody fusion by finite element analysis.

Authors:  Zhitao Xiao; Liya Wang; He Gong; Dong Zhu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Tissue loading created during spinal manipulation in comparison to loading created by passive spinal movements.

Authors:  Martha Funabashi; Gregory N Kawchuk; Albert H Vette; Peter Goldsmith; Narasimha Prasad
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Reduction of intradiscal pressure by the use of polycarbonate-urethane rods as compared to titanium rods in posterior thoracolumbar spinal fixation.

Authors:  Eva Jacobs; Alex K Roth; Jacobus J Arts; Lodewijk W van Rhijn; Paul C Willems
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  TELD with limited foraminoplasty has potential biomechanical advantages over TELD with large annuloplasty: an in-silico study.

Authors:  Jingchi Li; Chen Xu; Xiaoyu Zhang; Zhipeng Xi; Mengnan Liu; Zhongxin Fang; Nan Wang; Lin Xie; Yueming Song
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  The interspinous spacer: a clinicoanatomical investigation using plastination.

Authors:  Thomas Kaulhausen; Kourosh Zarghooni; Gregor Stein; Jutta Knifka; Peer Eysel; Juergen Koebke; Rolf Sobottke
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2012-08-01

10.  Effects of resting modes on human lumbar spines with different levels of degenerated intervertebral discs: a finite element investigation.

Authors:  Ruoxun Fan; He Gong; Sen Qiu; Xianbin Zhang; Juan Fang; Dong Zhu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.