Literature DB >> 16524582

Stepwise reduction of functional spinal structures increase range of motion and change lordosis angle.

Frank Heuer1, Hendrik Schmidt, Zdenek Klezl, Lutz Claes, Hans-Joachim Wilke.   

Abstract

Many investigators have performed studies on specific defect situations or determined the contribution on isolated structures. Investigating the contribution of functional structures requires obtaining the kinematic response directly on spinal segments. The purpose of this study was to quantify the function of anatomical components on lumbar segments for different loading magnitudes. Eight spinal segments (L4-5) with a median age of 52 years (ranging from 38 to 59 years) and a low degree of disc degeneration were utilized for the in vitro testing. Specimens were mounted in a custom-built spine tester and loaded with pure moments (1-10 N m) to move within three anatomical planes at a loading rate of 1.0 degrees /s. Anatomy was successively reduced by: ligaments, facet capsules, joints and nucleus. Data were evaluated for range of motion, neutral zone and lordosis angle. Transection of posterior ligaments predominantly increased specimen flexion for all bending moments applied. Supraspinous ligament also indicated to resist in extension slightly, whereas the facet capsules did not. Facet joints contributed to axial rotation, but not in lateral bending. The anterior longitudinal ligament was found to slightly resist in axial rotation, but strongly in extension. Nucleotomy caused largest increase of all movements. The unloaded posture of the specimens changed after ligament dissection, indicating ligament pretension. The region of lumbar spine is interesting for finite element (FE) simulation due to the high evidence of disc degeneration and injuries. This study may help to understand the function of specific anatomical structures and assists in FE model calibration. We suggest to start a calibration procedure for such models with the smallest functional structure (annulus) and to cumulatively add further structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16524582     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  40 in total

1.  Intraoperative determination of the load–displacement behavior of scoliotic spinal motion segments: preliminary clinical results.

Authors:  Christoph Reutlinger; Carol Hasler; Klaus Scheffler; Philippe Büchler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  An in vitro biomechanical comparison of Cadisc™-L with natural lumbar discs in axial compression and sagittal flexion.

Authors:  Donal McNally; Jason Naylor; Scott Johnson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A history of spine biomechanics. Focus on 20th century progress.

Authors:  T R Oxland
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Development of a novel radiographic measure of lumbar instability and validation using the facet fluid sign.

Authors:  John A Hipp; Richard D Guyer; Jack E Zigler; Donna D Ohnmeiss; Nicholas D Wharton
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

5.  Incorporating Six Degree-of-Freedom Intervertebral Joint Stiffness in a Lumbar Spine Musculoskeletal Model-Method and Performance in Flexed Postures.

Authors:  Xiangjie Meng; Alexander G Bruno; Bo Cheng; Wenjun Wang; Mary L Bouxsein; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Nagananda K Burra; Thomas Zander; Georg Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  [Biomechanical consequences of variations in artificial disc positioning. A finite element study on the lumbar spine].

Authors:  T Zander; A Rohlmann; B Bock; G Bergmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Computer simulation and image guidance for individualised dynamic spinal stabilization.

Authors:  S R Kantelhardt; U Hausen; M Kosterhon; A N Amr; K Gruber; A Giese
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-01-04       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Biomechanical analysis of spino-pelvic postural configurations in spondylolysis subjected to various sport-related dynamic loading conditions.

Authors:  Manon Sterba; Pierre-Jean Arnoux; Hubert Labelle; William C Warner; Carl-Éric Aubin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  A new method to approximate load-displacement relationships of spinal motion segments for patient-specific multi-body models of scoliotic spine.

Authors:  Athena Jalalian; Francis E H Tay; Soheil Arastehfar; Gabriel Liu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 2.602

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.