Literature DB >> 16311752

Spinal loads after osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated by vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty.

Antonius Rohlmann1, Thomas Zander, Georg Bergmann.   

Abstract

Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are routine treatments for compression fractures of vertebral bodies. A wedge-shaped compression fracture shifts the centre of gravity of the upper body anteriorly and generally, this shift can be compensated in the spine and in the hips. However, it is still unclear how a wedge-shaped compression fracture of a vertebra increases forces in the trunk muscle and the intradiscal pressure in the adjacent discs. A nonlinear finite element model of the lumbar spine was used to estimate the force in the trunk muscle, the intradiscal pressure and the stresses in the endplates in the intact spine, and after vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty treatment. In this study, kyphoplasty represents a treatment with nearly full fracture reduction and vertebroplasty one without restoration of kyphotic angle although in reality kyphoplasty does not guarantee fracture reduction. If no compensation of upper body shift is assumed, the force in the erector spine increases by about 200% for the vertebroplasty but by only 55% for the kyphoplasty compared to the intact spine. Intradiscal pressure increases by about 60 and 20% for the vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, respectively. In contrast, with shift compensation of the upper body, the increase in muscle force is much lower and increase in intradiscal pressure is only about 20 and 7.5% for the vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, respectively. Augmentation of the vertebral body with bone cement has a much smaller effect on intradiscal pressure. The increase in that case is only about 2.4% for the intact as well as for the fractured vertebra. Moreover, the effect of upper body shift after a wedge-shaped vertebral body fracture on intradiscal pressure and thus on spinal load is much more pronounced than that of stiffness increase due to cement infiltration. Maximum von Mises stress in the endplates of all lumbar vertebrae is also higher after kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty. Cement augmentation has only a minor effect on endplate stresses in the unfractured vertebrae. The advantages of kyphoplasty found in this study will be apparent only if nearly full fracture reduction is achieved. Otherwise, differences between kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty become small or vanish. Our results suggest that vertebral body fractures in the adjacent vertebrae after vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty are not induced by the elevated stiffness of the treated vertebra, but instead the anterior shift of the upper body is the dominating factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16311752      PMCID: PMC3233952          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-0018-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  31 in total

1.  Intradiscal pressure together with anthropometric data--a data set for the validation of models.

Authors:  H Wilke; P Neef; B Hinz; H Seidel; L Claes
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Estimation of muscle forces in the lumbar spine during upper-body inclination.

Authors:  T Zander; A Rohlmann; J Calisse; G Bergmann
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Influence of a follower load on intradiscal pressure and intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  A Rohlmann; S Neller; L Claes; G Bergmann; H J Wilke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Lars Bauer; Thomas Zander; Georg Bergmann; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-04-26       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Effects of bone cement volume and distribution on vertebral stiffness after vertebroplasty.

Authors:  M A Liebschner; W S Rosenberg; T M Keaveny
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures.

Authors:  S R Garfin; H A Yuan; M A Reiley
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The biomechanics of vertebroplasty. The effect of cement volume on mechanical behavior.

Authors:  S M Belkoff; J M Mathis; L E Jasper; H Deramond
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures.

Authors:  M E Jensen; J E Dion
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.264

9.  Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty. A biomechanical investigation.

Authors:  U Berlemann; S J Ferguson; L P Nolte; P F Heini
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-07

10.  An in vivo comparison of the potential for extravertebral cement leak after vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Frank M Phillips; F Todd Wetzel; Isadore Lieberman; Marrion Campbell-Hupp
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  36 in total

1.  Preventive vertebroplasty for adjacent vertebral bodies: a good solution to reduce adjacent vertebral fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  C H Yen; M M H Teng; W H Yuan; Y C Sun; C Y Chang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  A survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2006.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  [Biomechanical consequences of variations in artificial disc positioning. A finite element study on the lumbar spine].

Authors:  T Zander; A Rohlmann; B Bock; G Bergmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Parameters influencing the outcome after total disc replacement at the lumbosacral junction. Part 1: misalignment of the vertebrae adjacent to a total disc replacement affects the facet joint and facet capsule forces in a probabilistic finite element analysis.

Authors:  A Rohlmann; S Lauterborn; M Dreischarf; H Schmidt; M Putzier; P Strube; T Zander
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  [Stabilization of the osteoporotic spine from a biomechanical viewpoint].

Authors:  C-E Heyde; A Rohlmann; U Weber; R Kayser
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  [Stiffening effect of a transsacral fusion system for the lumbosacral junction. A probabilistic finite element analysis and sensitivity study].

Authors:  H N Boustani; A Rohlmann; O Abouezzeddine; G Bergmann; T Zander
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  [Kyphoplasty in osteoporotic spinal fractures].

Authors:  A Prokop; F Löhlein; M Chmilniecki; J Volbracht; M Manner
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Balloon kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a prospective, comparative, and randomized clinical study.

Authors:  J T Liu; W J Liao; W C Tan; J K Lee; C H Liu; Y H Chen; T B Lin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Modification of PMMA vertebroplasty cement for reduced stiffness by addition of normal saline: a material properties evaluation.

Authors:  Christian Schröder; Mai Nguyen; Michael Kraxenberger; Yan Chevalier; Carolin Melcher; Bernd Wegener; Christof Birkenmaier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Mechanical properties of blood-mixed polymethylmetacrylate in percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Dong Ki Ahn; Song Lee; Dea Jung Choi; Soon Yeol Park; Dae Gon Woo; Chi Hoon Kim; Han Sung Kim
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2009-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.