Literature DB >> 17333035

[Key performance indicators of OR efficiency. Myths and evidence of key performance indicators in OR management].

M Schuster1, L L Wicha, M Fiege.   

Abstract

A variety of different key performance indicators, both for process and financial performance, are used to evaluate OR efficiency. Certain indicators like OR utilization and turnover times seem to become common standard in many hospitals to evaluate OR process performance. Despite the general use and availability of these indicators in OR management, the scientific evidence behind these data is relatively low. These process indicators are strongly influenced by artefacts and depend on planning process, resource allocation and documentation. Direct financial indicators become more important with increasing autonomy of OR management. Besides budgetary compliance the focus is set on the net results of internal transfer pricing systems. By taking part in an internal transfer pricing system, OR management develops from a mere passive cost center to an active shaper of perioperative processes. However, detailed knowledge of the origin of costs and pitfalls of internal transfer pricing systems is crucial. The increased transparency due to the free accessibility of diagnosis-related-groups (DRG) cost breakdown data can help to develop tools for economic analysis of OR efficiency.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17333035     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-006-1126-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  36 in total

1.  Labor costs incurred by anesthesiology groups because of operating rooms not being allocated and cases not being scheduled to maximize operating room efficiency.

Authors:  Amr E Abouleish; Franklin Dexter; Richard H Epstein; David A Lubarsky; Charles W Whitten; Donald S Prough
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Use of operating room information system data to predict the impact of reducing turnover times on staffing costs.

Authors:  Franklin Dexter; Amr E Abouleish; Richard H Epstein; Charles W Whitten; David A Lubarsky
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Tactical decision making for selective expansion of operating room resources incorporating financial criteria and uncertainty in subspecialties' future workloads.

Authors:  Franklin Dexter; Johannes Ledolter; Ruth E Wachtel
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Deliberate perioperative systems design improves operating room throughput.

Authors:  Warren S Sandberg; Bethany Daily; Marie Egan; James E Stahl; Julian M Goldman; Richard A Wiklund; David Rattner
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Use of anesthesia induction rooms can increase the number of urgent orthopedic cases completed within 7 hours.

Authors:  Paulus M Torkki; Riitta A Marjamaa; Markus I Torkki; Pentti E Kallio; Olli A Kirvelä
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  The impact on revenue of increasing patient volume at surgical suites with relatively high operating room utilization.

Authors:  F Dexter; A Macario; D A Lubarsky
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  An operating room scheduling strategy to maximize the use of operating room block time: computer simulation of patient scheduling and survey of patients' preferences for surgical waiting time.

Authors:  F Dexter; A Macario; R D Traub; M Hopwood; D A Lubarsky
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Overlapping induction of anesthesia: an analysis of benefits and costs.

Authors:  Robert Hanss; Björn Buttgereit; Peter H Tonner; Berthold Bein; Andreas Schleppers; Markus Steinfath; Jens Scholz; Martin Bauer
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Changing allocations of operating room time from a system based on historical utilization to one where the aim is to schedule as many surgical cases as possible.

Authors:  Franklin Dexter; Alex Macario
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Decreases in anesthesia-controlled time cannot permit one additional surgical operation to be reliably scheduled during the workday.

Authors:  F Dexter; S Coffin; J H Tinker
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.108

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  [Quality of OR planning. Avoiding operating room underutilization or overutilization].

Authors:  R Grote; K Sydow; A Walleneit; D Leuchtmann; M Menzel
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  [Workflow management in the operating room. Analysis of potentials for optimizing efficiency at a university hospital].

Authors:  A Welker; B Wolcke; A Schleppers; S B Schmeck; U Focke; H W Gervais; J Schmeck
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  [OR minute myth : Guidelines for calculation of DRG revenues per OR minute].

Authors:  R M Waeschle; J Hinz; F Bleeker; B Sliwa; A Popov; C E Schmidt; M Bauer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  [Utilization rates and turnover times as indicators of OR workflow efficiency].

Authors:  M Schuster; L L Wicha; M Fiege; A E Goetz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  [Operation room management: from degree of utilization to distribution of capacities. Cost reduction without decreasing productivity in the operation room using a new index].

Authors:  R Grote; S Perschmann; A Walleneit; B Sedlacek; D Leuchtmann; M Menzel
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  [Role-specific targets and teamwork in the operating room].

Authors:  K Hoeper; M Kriependorf; C Felix; P Nyhuis; A Tecklenburg
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  [The Göttingen manual for OR managers].

Authors:  M Bauer; J Hinz; A Klockgether-Radke
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  [Performance development of a university operating room after implementation of a central operating room management].

Authors:  R M Waeschle; B Sliwa; M Jipp; H Pütz; J Hinz; M Bauer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  [Treatment costs for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: procedure related cost analysis in an university hospital].

Authors:  E V Geiger; H L Laurer; H Jakob; J M Frank; I Marzi
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  [Time delay in beginning first OR positions in the morning].

Authors:  J Unger; M Schuster; K Bauer; H Krieg; R Müller; C Spies
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.