Literature DB >> 27380050

[Performance development of a university operating room after implementation of a central operating room management].

R M Waeschle1, B Sliwa2, M Jipp3, H Pütz3, J Hinz3, M Bauer3,4.   

Abstract

The difficult financial situation in German hospitals requires measures for improvement in process quality. Associated increases in revenues in the high income field "operating room (OR) area" are increasingly the responsibility of OR management but it has not been shown that the introduction of an efficiency-oriented management leads to an increase in process quality and revenues in the operating theatre. Therefore the performance in the operating theatre of the University Medical Center Göttingen was analyzed for working days in the core operating time from 7.45 a.m. to 3.30 p.m. from 2009 to 2014. The achievement of process target times for the morning surgery start time and the turnover times of anesthesia and OR-nurses were calculated as indicators of process quality. The number of operations and cumulative incision-suture time were also analyzed as aggregated performance indicators. In order to assess the development of revenues in the operating theatre, the revenues from diagnosis-related groups (DRG) in all inpatient and occupational accident cases, adjusted for the regional basic case value from 2009, were calculated for each year. The development of revenues was also analyzed after deduction of revenues resulting from altered economic case weighting. It could be shown that the achievement of process target values for the morning surgery start time could be improved by 40 %, the turnover times for anesthesia reduced by 50 % and for the OR-nurses by 36 %. Together with the introduction of central planning for reallocation, an increase in operation numbers of 21 % and cumulative incision-suture times of 12% could be realized. Due to these additional operations the DRG revenues in 2014 could be increased to 132 % compared to 2009 or 127 % if the revenues caused by economic case weighting were excluded. The personnel complement in anesthesia (-1.7 %) and OR-nurses (+2.6 %) as well as anesthetists (+6.7 %) increased less compared to the revenues or were slightly reduced. This improvement in process quality and cumulative incision-suture times as well as the increase in revenues, reflect the positive impact of an efficiency-oriented central OR management. The OR management releases due to measures of process optimization the necessary personnel and time resources and therefore achieves the basic prerequisites for increased revenues of surgical disciplines. The method presented can be used by other hospitals as a guideline to analyze performance development.

Keywords:  Diagnosis-related groups; OR management; Productivity; Revenues; Staff development

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27380050     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-016-0184-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  18 in total

1.  Surgical subspecialty block utilization and capacity planning: a minimal cost analysis model.

Authors:  D P Strum; L G Vargas; J H May
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Use of anesthesia induction rooms can increase the number of urgent orthopedic cases completed within 7 hours.

Authors:  Paulus M Torkki; Riitta A Marjamaa; Markus I Torkki; Pentti E Kallio; Olli A Kirvelä
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Interdisciplinary work flow assessment and redesign decreases operating room turnover time and allows for additional caseload.

Authors:  Juan C Cendán; Mike Good
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2006-01

Review 4.  [Key performance indicators of OR efficiency. Myths and evidence of key performance indicators in OR management].

Authors:  M Schuster; L L Wicha; M Fiege
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  [The Göttingen manual for OR managers].

Authors:  M Bauer; J Hinz; A Klockgether-Radke
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Surgical suite utilization and capacity planning: a minimal cost analysis model.

Authors:  D P Strum; L G Vargas; J H May; G Bashein
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Successful strategies for improving operating room efficiency at academic institutions.

Authors:  F J Overdyk; S C Harvey; R L Fishman; F Shippey
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Reorganizing patient care and workflow in the operating room: a cost-effectiveness study.

Authors:  James E Stahl; Warren S Sandberg; Bethany Daily; Richard Wiklund; Marie T Egan; Julian M Goldman; Keith B Isaacson; Scott Gazelle; David W Rattner
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Overlapping induction of anesthesia: an analysis of benefits and costs.

Authors:  Robert Hanss; Björn Buttgereit; Peter H Tonner; Berthold Bein; Andreas Schleppers; Markus Steinfath; Jens Scholz; Martin Bauer
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  [Central induction area. Reduction of non-operative time without additional costs].

Authors:  H Krieg; T Schröder; J Grosse; M Hensel; T Volk; C von Heymann; K Bauer; R-W Bock; C D Spies
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.041

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effectiveness of architectural separation of septic and aseptic operating theatres for improving process quality and patient outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Romy Scholz; Alexander Hönning; Julia Seifert; Nikolai Spranger; Dirk Stengel
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-01-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.