Literature DB >> 7486114

Decreases in anesthesia-controlled time cannot permit one additional surgical operation to be reliably scheduled during the workday.

F Dexter1, S Coffin, J H Tinker.   

Abstract

We tested whether anesthesiologists can decrease operating room (OR) costs by working more quickly. Anesthesia-controlled time (ACT) was defined as the sum of 1) the time starting when the patient enters an OR until preparation or surgical positioning can begin plus 2) the time starting when the dressing is finished and ending when the patient leaves the OR. Case time was defined as the time starting when one patient undergoing an operation leaves an OR and ending when the next patient undergoing the same operation leaves the OR. An actual case series was constructed of 709 consecutive patients who underwent one of 11 elective operations at a tertiary care center. Statistical analysis of measured OR times showed that ACt would have to be decreased by more than 100% to permit one additional scheduled, short (30-min) operation to be performed in an OR during an 8-h workday after a prior series of cases, each lasting more than 45 min. Anesthesiologists alone cannot reasonably decrease case times sufficiently to permit one extra case to be reliably scheduled during a workday. Methods to decrease ACT (e.g., using preoperative intravenous catheter teams, procedure rooms, and/or shorter acting drugs) may simply increase costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7486114     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199512000-00024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  34 in total

Review 1.  Cost considerations in the use of anaesthetic drugs.

Authors:  I Smith
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  [Quality of OR planning. Avoiding operating room underutilization or overutilization].

Authors:  R Grote; K Sydow; A Walleneit; D Leuchtmann; M Menzel
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Delays in the operating room: signs of an imperfect system.

Authors:  Janice Wong; Kathleen Joy Khu; Zul Kaderali; Mark Bernstein
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  The Impact of Overestimations of Surgical Control Times Across Multiple Specialties on Medical Systems.

Authors:  Albert Wu; Ethan Y Brovman; Edward E Whang; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Richard D Urman
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Impact on operating room efficiency of reducing turnover times and anesthesia-controlled times.

Authors:  Franklin Dexter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  [Key performance indicators of OR efficiency. Myths and evidence of key performance indicators in OR management].

Authors:  M Schuster; L L Wicha; M Fiege
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Increasing operating room efficiency through parallel processing.

Authors:  David M Friedman; Suzanne M Sokal; Yuchiao Chang; David L Berger
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  [Utilization rates and turnover times as indicators of OR workflow efficiency].

Authors:  M Schuster; L L Wicha; M Fiege; A E Goetz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  [Controlling and reporting in operating room management: analysis of the state of development].

Authors:  M Berry; G Schüpfer; J Martin; M Bauer; C Denz; H-J Bender; A Schleppers
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 10.  [Simulation-based analysis of novel therapy principles. Effects on the efficiency of operating room processes].

Authors:  A Baumgart; C Denz; H Bender; M Bauer; S Hunziker; G Schüpfer; A Schleppers
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.