Literature DB >> 8371675

Quantitative evaluation of several partial Fourier reconstruction algorithms used in MRI.

G McGibney1, M R Smith, S T Nichols, A Crawley.   

Abstract

Partial Fourier reconstruction algorithms exploit the redundancy in magnetic resonance data sets so that half of the data is calculated during image reconstruction rather than acquired. The conjugate synthesis, Margosian, homodyne detection, Cuppen and POCS algorithms are evaluated using spatial frequency domain analysis to show their characteristics and where limitations may occur. The phase correction used in partial Fourier reconstruction is equivalent to a convolution in the frequency domain and the importance of accurately implementing this convolution is demonstrated. New reconstruction approaches, based on passing the partial data through a phase correcting, finite impulse response (FIR), digital filter are suggested. These FIR and MoFIR algorithms have a speed near that of the Margosian and homodyne detection reconstructions, but with a lower error; close to that of the Cuppen/POCS iterative approaches. Quantitative analysis of the partial Fourier algorithms, tested with three phase estimation techniques, are provided by comparing artificial and clinical data reconstructed using full and partial Fourier techniques.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8371675     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910300109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  61 in total

1.  SMASH imaging with an eight element multiplexed RF coil array.

Authors:  J A Bankson; M A Griswold; S M Wright; D K Sodickson
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  POCS-based reconstruction of multiplexed sensitivity encoded MRI (POCSMUSE): A general algorithm for reducing motion-related artifacts.

Authors:  Mei-Lan Chu; Hing-Chiu Chang; Hsiao-Wen Chung; Trong-Kha Truong; Mustafa R Bashir; Nan-kuei Chen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  In vivo proton electron double resonance imaging of mice with fast spin echo pulse sequence.

Authors:  Ziqi Sun; Haihong Li; Sergey Petryakov; Alex Samouilov; Jay L Zweier
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Increasing temporal resolution of DSC perfusion MRI using the analytic image concept.

Authors:  Josiane Yankam Njiwa; David Ratering; Christof Baltes; Markus Rudin
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  MODEL-BASED IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION FOR MRI.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Fessler
Journal:  IEEE Signal Process Mag       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 12.551

Review 6.  Compressed sensing MRI: a review of the clinical literature.

Authors:  Oren N Jaspan; Roman Fleysher; Michael L Lipton
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  Ultrafast inverse imaging techniques for fMRI.

Authors:  Fa-Hsuan Lin; Kevin W K Tsai; Ying-Hua Chu; Thomas Witzel; Aapo Nummenmaa; Tommi Raij; Jyrki Ahveninen; Wen-Jui Kuo; John W Belliveau
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Partial field-of-view spiral phase-contrast imaging using complex difference processing.

Authors:  Reza Nezafat; Richard B Thompson; J Andrew Derbyshire; Elliot R McVeigh
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Comparison of generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions and modified sensitivity encoding for diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Y A Bhagat; D J Emery; S Naik; T Yeo; C Beaulieu
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Accelerated 4D quantitative single point EPR imaging using model-based reconstruction.

Authors:  Hyungseok Jang; Shingo Matsumoto; Nallathamby Devasahayam; Sankaran Subramanian; Jiachen Zhuo; Murali C Krishna; Alan B McMillan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.