Literature DB >> 33455533

Compressed sensing time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography with high spatial resolution for evaluating intracranial aneurysms: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.

Donghyun Kim1, Young Jin Heo1, Hae Woong Jeong1, Jin Wook Baek1, Gi Won Shin1, Sung-Chul Jin2, Hye Jin Baek3, Kyeong Hwa Ryu3, Kang Soo Kim4, InSeong Kim4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Compressed sensing is used for accelerated acquisitions with incoherently under-sampled k-space data, and intracranial time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography is suitable for compressed sensing. Compressed sensing time-of-flight is beneficial in decreasing acquisition time and increasing spatial resolution while maintaining acquisition time. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the image quality and diagnostic performance of compressed sensing time-of-flight with high spatial resolution and compare with parallel imaging time-of-flight using digital subtraction angiography as a reference.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In total, 39 patients with 46 intracranial aneurysms underwent parallel imaging and compressed sensing time-of-flight in the same imaging session and digital subtraction angiography before or after magnetic resonance angiography. The overall image quality, artefacts and diagnostic confidence were assessed by two observers. The contrast ratio, maximal aneurysm diameters and diagnostic performance were evaluated.
RESULTS: Compressed sensing time-of-flight showed significantly better overall image quality, degree of artefacts and diagnostic confidence in both observers, with better inter-observer agreement. The contrast ratio was significantly higher for compressed sensing time-of-flight than for parallel imaging time-of-flight in both observers (source images, P < 0.001; maximum intensity projection images, P < 0.05 for both observers); however, the measured maximal diameters of aneurysms were not significantly different. Compressed sensing time-of-flight showed higher sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and positive and negative predictive values for detecting aneurysms than parallel imaging time-of-flight in both observers, with better inter-observer agreement. Compressed sensing time-of-flight was preferred over parallel imaging time-of-flight by both observers; however, parallel imaging time-of-flight was preferred in cases of giant and large aneurysms.
CONCLUSIONS: Compressed sensing-time-of-flight provides better image quality and diagnostic performance than parallel imaging time-of-flight. However, neuroradiologists should be aware of under-sampling artefacts caused by compressed sensing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Compressed sensing; cerebral aneurysm; time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33455533      PMCID: PMC8165900          DOI: 10.1177/1971400920988099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiol J        ISSN: 1971-4009


  30 in total

1.  Parallel imaging reconstruction using automatic regularization.

Authors:  Fa-Hsuan Lin; Kenneth K Kwong; John W Belliveau; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging.

Authors:  Michael Lustig; David Donoho; John M Pauly
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: comparison of 3D time-of-flight and 3D phase-contrast MR angiography.

Authors:  M Oelerich; M G Lentschig; P Zunker; P Reimer; E J Rummeny; G Schuierer
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Contrast-free MRA at 3.0 T for the detection of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  M-H Li; Y-D Li; H-Q Tan; B-X Gu; Y-C Chen; W Wang; S-W Chen; D-J Hu
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Highly accelerated compressed sensing time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography may be reliable for diagnosing head and neck arterial steno-occlusive disease: a comparative study with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Xuan Zhang; Yue Zhou Cao; Xi Hu Mu; Yi Sun; Michaela Schmidt; Christoph Forman; Peter Speier; Shan Shan Lu; Xun Ning Hong
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  MR imaging of middle cerebral artery stenosis and occlusion: value of MR angiography.

Authors:  N Fujita; N Hirabuki; K Fujii; T Hashimoto; T Miura; T Sato; T Kozuka
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  Risk Factors for Growth of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  W Brinjikji; Y-Q Zhu; G Lanzino; H J Cloft; M H Murad; Z Wang; D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for cerebral aneurysms in correlation with 3D-digital subtraction angiographic images: a study of 133 aneurysms.

Authors:  Mika Okahara; Hiro Kiyosue; Masanori Yamashita; Hirohumi Nagatomi; Hiroyuki Hata; Toshiyuki Saginoya; Yoshiko Sagara; Hiromu Mori
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Evaluation of intracranial aneurysms with 7 T versus 1.5 T time-of-flight MR angiography - initial experience.

Authors:  C Mönninghoff; S Maderwald; J M Theysohn; O Kraff; S C Ladd; M E Ladd; M Forsting; H H Quick; I Wanke
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2008-12-29

10.  Magnetic resonance angiography with compressed sensing: An evaluation of moyamoya disease.

Authors:  Takayuki Yamamoto; Tomohisa Okada; Yasutaka Fushimi; Akira Yamamoto; Koji Fujimoto; Sachi Okuchi; Hikaru Fukutomi; Jun C Takahashi; Takeshi Funaki; Susumu Miyamoto; Aurélien F Stalder; Yutaka Natsuaki; Peter Speier; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Intelligent Algorithm-Based Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography to Diagnose Coronary Heart Disease.

Authors:  Shaowen Tan; Zili Xu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.238

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.