Literature DB >> 17294307

Construct validity of the LapSim: can the LapSim virtual reality simulator distinguish between novices and experts?

K W van Dongen1, E Tournoij, D C van der Zee, M P Schijven, I A M J Broeders.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Virtual reality simulators may be invaluable in training and assessing future endoscopic surgeons. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the results of a training session reflect the actual skill of the trainee who is being assessed and thereby establish construct validity for the LapSim virtual reality simulator (Surgical Science Ltd., Gothenburg, Sweden).
METHODS: Forty-eight subjects were assigned to one of three groups: 16 novices (0 endoscopic procedures), 16 surgical residents in training (>10 but <100 endoscopic procedures), and 16 experienced endoscopic surgeons (>100 endoscopic procedures). Performance was measured by a relative scoring system that combines single parameters measured by the computer.
RESULTS: The higher the level of endoscopic experience of a participant, the higher the score. Experienced surgeons and surgical residents in training showed statistically significant higher scores than novices for both overall score and efficiency, speed, and precision parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that performance of the various tasks on the simulator corresponds to the respective level of endoscopic experience in our research population. This study demonstrates construct validity for the LapSim virtual reality simulator. It thus measures relevant skills and can be integrated in an endoscopic training and assessment program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17294307     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-006-9188-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  17 in total

1.  Influence of the optical axis-to-target view angle on endoscopic task performance.

Authors:  G B Hanna; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced, junior, and novice laparoscopists with virtual reality.

Authors:  A G Gallagher; K Richie; N McClure; J McGuigan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Construct validity: experts and novices performing on the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator.

Authors:  M Schijven; J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators.

Authors:  F J Carter; M P Schijven; R Aggarwal; T Grantcharov; N K Francis; G B Hanna; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Objective assessment of laparoscopic skills using a virtual reality stimulator.

Authors:  J R Eriksen; T Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  The Eindhoven laparoscopic cholecystectomy training course--improving operating room performance using virtual reality training: results from the first E.A.E.S. accredited virtual reality trainings curriculum.

Authors:  M P Schijven; J J Jakimowicz; I A M J Broeders; L N L Tseng
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G B Hanna; S M Shimi; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Laparoscopic or conventional Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: randomised clinical trial. The Netherlands Antireflux Surgery Study Group.

Authors:  J E Bais; J F Bartelsman; H J Bonjer; M A Cuesta; P M Go; E C Klinkenberg-Knol; J J van Lanschot; J H Nadorp; A J Smout; Y van der Graaf; H G Gooszen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Bile duct injury during laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy.

Authors:  D J Gouma; P M Go
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  The "learning curve" in the performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J Sariego; L Spitzer; T Matsumoto
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  1993 Jan-Mar
View more
  35 in total

1.  Hysteroscopic placement of tubal sterilization implants: virtual reality simulator training.

Authors:  Pierre Panel; Michael Bajka; Arnaud Le Tohic; Alaa El Ghoneimi; Carmen Chis; Stéphane Cotin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Educational and training aspects of new surgical techniques: experience with the endoscopic–laparoscopic interdisciplinary training entity (ELITE) model in training for a natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approach to appendectomy.

Authors:  Sonja Gillen; Jörn Gröne; Fritz Knödgen; Petra Wolf; Michael Meyer; Helmut Friess; Heinz-Johannes Buhr; Jörg-Peter Ritz; Hubertus Feussner; Kai S Lehmann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The virtual reality simulator dV-Trainer(®) is a valid assessment tool for robotic surgical skills.

Authors:  Cyril Perrenot; Manuela Perez; Nguyen Tran; Jean-Philippe Jehl; Jacques Felblinger; Laurent Bresler; Jacques Hubert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Review of available methods of simulation training to facilitate surgical education.

Authors:  Badma Bashankaev; Sergey Baido; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  European consensus on a competency-based virtual reality training program for basic endoscopic surgical psychomotor skills.

Authors:  Koen W van Dongen; Gunnar Ahlberg; Luigi Bonavina; Fiona J Carter; Teodor P Grantcharov; Anders Hyltander; Marlies P Schijven; Alessandro Stefani; David C van der Zee; Ivo A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Construct validity of the LapVR virtual-reality surgical simulator.

Authors:  Naoki Iwata; Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera; Chie Tanaka; Norifumi Ohashi; Goro Nakayama; Masahiko Koike; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  The LapSim virtual reality simulator: promising but not yet proven.

Authors:  Katherine Fairhurst; Andrew Strickland; Guy Maddern
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  A randomized crossover trial examining low- versus high-fidelity simulation in basic laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  Swee Chin Tan; Nicholas Marlow; John Field; Meryl Altree; Wendy Babidge; Peter Hewett; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Designing a Standardized Laparoscopy Curriculum for Gynecology Residents: A Delphi Approach.

Authors:  Eliane M Shore; Guylaine G Lefebvre; Heinrich Husslein; Flemming Bjerrum; Jette Led Sorensen; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-06

10.  Camera navigation and tissue manipulation; are these laparoscopic skills related?

Authors:  Sonja N Buzink; Sanne M B I Botden; Jeroen Heemskerk; Richard H M Goossens; Huib de Ridder; Jack J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.