Literature DB >> 10094750

Influence of the optical axis-to-target view angle on endoscopic task performance.

G B Hanna1, A Cuschieri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The location of the optical port and the choice of endoscope determine the angle subtended between the optical axis of the endoscope and the plane of the operation target: the optical axis-to-target view (OATV) angle. The aim of the study was to investigate the influence OATV angle on endoscopic task performance.
METHODS: The Dundee Endoscopic Psychomotor Tester was used for objective assessment of endoscopic task performance. Ten surgeons carried out a standard task with the optical axis of the endoscope subtending 90 degrees, 75 degrees, 60 degrees and 45 degrees to the target surface. Each subject underwent three test sessions. Each session consisted of one run with each of the OATV angles in a random order. The outcome measures were the errors rate, the execution time, and the force applied on the target.
RESULTS: The 90 degrees OATV angle had the best accuracy, the shortest execution time, and the lowest force applied on the back plate. The errors rate increased from 17% with the 90 degrees OATV angle to 79% with the 45 degrees angle. There was a significant increase in execution time and force with the decrease in the OATV angle (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The best task performance is obtained when the optical axis of the endoscope is perpendicular to the target plane.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10094750     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  21 in total

1.  Effect of the angle between the optical axis of the endoscope and the instruments' plane on monitor image and surgical performance.

Authors:  P V Patil; G B Hanna; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The Advanced Dundee Endoscopic Psychomotor Tester (ADEPT) objectifying subjective psychomotor test performance.

Authors:  M P Schijven; J Jakimowicz; C Schot
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Skill performance in open videoscopic surgery.

Authors:  A Mohamed; A Rafiq; L Panait; V Lavrentyev; C R Doarn; R C Merrell
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Construct validity of the LapSim: can the LapSim virtual reality simulator distinguish between novices and experts?

Authors:  K W van Dongen; E Tournoij; D C van der Zee; M P Schijven; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Comparison of a supplemental wide field of view versus a single field of view with zoom on performance in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Alex Cao; R Darin Ellis; Elizabeth D Klein; Gregory W Auner; Michael D Klein; Abhilash K Pandya
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Influence of instrument size on endoscopic task performance in pediatric intracorporeal knot tying: smaller instruments are better in infants.

Authors:  Alex C H Lee; Munther J Haddad; George B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Precision in stitches: Radius Surgical System.

Authors:  M Waseda; N Inaki; J R Torres Bermudez; G Manukyan; I A Gacek; M O Schurr; M Braun; G F Buess
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Measuring mental workload during the performance of advanced laparoscopic tasks.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Maria A Cassera; Danny V Martinec; Georg O Spaun; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Psychomotor performance measured in a virtual environment correlates with technical skills in the operating room.

Authors:  Pavi S Kundhal; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Construct validity and educational role for motion analysis in a laparoscopic trainer.

Authors:  Maeve O'Neill Trudeau; Ahmed Nasr; Brian Carrillo; J Ted Gerstle; Georges Azzie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.