Literature DB >> 20552373

Review of available methods of simulation training to facilitate surgical education.

Badma Bashankaev1, Sergey Baido, Steven D Wexner.   

Abstract

The old paradigm of "see one, do one, teach one" has now changed to "see several, learn the skills and simulation, do one, teach one." Modern medicine over the past 30 years has undergone significant revolutions from earlier models made possible by significant technological advances. Scientific and technological progress has made these advances possible not only by increasing the complexity of procedures, but also by increasing the ability to have complex methods of training to perform these sophisticated procedures. Simulators in training labs have been much more embraced outside the operating room, with advanced cardiac life support using hands-on models (CPR "dummy") as well as a fusion with computer-based testing for examinations ranging from the United States medical licensure exam to the examinations administered by the American Board of Surgery and the American Board of Colon and Rectal Surgery. Thus, the development of training methods that test both technical skills and clinical acumen may be essential to help achieve both safety and financial goals.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20552373     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1123-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  41 in total

1.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Acquiring surgical skills: a comparative study of open versus laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Kesavapillai Subramonian; Suren DeSylva; Peter Bishai; Peter Thompson; Gordon Muir
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Validation of a new basic virtual reality simulator for training of basic endoscopic skills: the SIMENDO.

Authors:  E G G Verdaasdonk; L P S Stassen; L J Monteny; J Dankelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic skills laboratories: current assessment and a call for resident training standards.

Authors:  James R Korndorffer; Dimitris Stefanidis; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Advantages of advanced laparoscopic systems.

Authors:  J Heemskerk; R Zandbergen; J G Maessen; J W M Greve; N D Bouvy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  How does the camera assistant decide the zooming ratio of laparoscopic images? Analysis and implementation.

Authors:  Atsushi Nishikawa; Hiroaki Nakagoe; Kazuhiro Taniguchi; Yasuo Yamada; Mitsugu Sekimoto; Shuji Takiguchi; Morito Monden; Fumio Miyazaki
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2008

7.  The impact of video games on training surgeons in the 21st century.

Authors:  James C Rosser; Paul J Lynch; Laurie Cuddihy; Douglas A Gentile; Jonathan Klonsky; Ronald Merrell
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2007-02

8.  Desktop simulator: key to universal training?

Authors:  Hanna Bruynzeel; Anton F J de Bruin; Hendrik J Bonjer; Johan F Lange; Wim C J Hop; Ifesegun D Ayodeji; Geert Kazemier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Comparison of surgical performance during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy of two robotic camera holders, EndoAssist and AESOP: a pilot study.

Authors:  Andrew A Wagner; Ioannis M Varkarakis; Richard E Link; Wendy Sullivan; Li-Ming Su
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Controlled trial of the introduction of a robotic camera assistant (EndoAssist) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S Aiono; J M Gilbert; B Soin; P A Finlay; A Gordan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-06-14       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Need for simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery training.

Authors:  Valerio Celentano
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-09-27

Review 2.  Optimal training design for procedural motor skills: a review and application to laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Edward N Spruit; Guido P H Band; Jaap F Hamming; K Richard Ridderinkhof
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-11-08

3.  A robotic teaching session: separating tool from technique to emphasize a cognitive focused teaching environment.

Authors:  Courtney A Green; Patricia S O'Sullivan; Hueylan Chern
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-01-09

4.  Virtual reality-based assessment of basic laparoscopic skills using the Leap Motion controller.

Authors:  Vasileios Lahanas; Constantinos Loukas; Konstantinos Georgiou; Hani Lababidi; Dania Al-Jaroudi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  What to consider when designing a laparoscopic colorectal training curriculum: a review of the literature.

Authors:  A Gaitanidis; C Simopoulos; M Pitiakoudis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 6.  Current status of residency training in laparoscopic surgery in Brazil: a critical review.

Authors:  Miguel Prestes Nácul; Leandro Totti Cavazzola; Marco Cezário de Melo
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2015

7.  Face and content validity of analog surgical instruments on a novel physics-driven minimally invasive spinal fusion surgical simulator.

Authors:  Brittany Stott; Mark Driscoll
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.079

8.  Haptic simulators accelerate laparoscopic simulator training, but skills are not transferable to a non-haptic simulator: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Anishan Vamadevan; Lars Konge; Morten Stadeager; Flemming Bjerrum
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 3.453

9.  Construct validity of an inanimate training model for laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  Omaira Rodriguez; Alexis Sanchez-Ismayel; Renata Sanchez; Romina Pena; Oriana Salamo
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Computer-assisted teaching of skin flap surgery: validation of a mobile platform software for medical students.

Authors:  David P de Sena; Daniela D Fabricio; Maria Helena I Lopes; Vinicius D da Silva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.