Literature DB >> 20962146

Evaluation of the BD GeneOhm assay using the rotor-gene 6000 platform for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from pooled screening swabs.

Melvyn Howard Smith1, Julian Hodgson, Ian Joseph Eltringham.   

Abstract

As health services move toward universal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screening for hospital admissions, the most cost-effective approach is yet to be defined. In this study, one of the largest to date, we evaluated the performance of the BD GeneOhm MRSA assay on the Rotor-Gene 6000 thermal cycler, using samples taken directly from pooled MRSA screens. Results were compared with the same assay performed on the Smart-Cycler II platform and overnight broth culture. Samples yielding discrepant results were subjected to detailed analysis with an in-house PCR and patient note review. A total of 1,428 pooled MRSA screens were tested. Sensitivities and specificities of 85.3% and 95.8% for the Rotor-Gene and 81% and 95.7% for the Smart-Cycler were obtained, compared with broth enrichment. The sensitivity of the BD GeneOhm assay was increased to 100% when the results of in-house PCR and patient note review were taken into account. This study demonstrates that the Rotor-Gene 6000 thermal cycler is a reliable platform for use with the BD GeneOhm assay. It also proves that commercial PCR can be performed direct on pooled samples in selective broth, without the need for overnight incubation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20962146      PMCID: PMC3008482          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01512-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  20 in total

1.  Rapid identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and simultaneous species confirmation using real-time fluorescence PCR.

Authors:  U Reischl; H J Linde; M Metz; B Leppmeier; N Lehn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Concurrent analysis of nose and groin swab specimens by the IDI-MRSA PCR assay is comparable to analysis by individual-specimen PCR and routine culture assays for detection of colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Emma J Bishop; Elizabeth A Grabsch; Susan A Ballard; Barrie Mayall; Shirley Xie; Rhea Martin; M Lindsay Grayson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Effect on MRSA transmission of rapid PCR testing of patients admitted to critical care.

Authors:  R Cunningham; P Jenks; J Northwood; M Wallis; S Ferguson; S Hunt
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Evaluation of the IDI-MRSA assay for detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus from nasal and rectal specimens pooled in a selective broth.

Authors:  M Desjardins; Christiane Guibord; B Lalonde; B Toye; K Ramotar
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of six methods of extracting Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA from processed sputum for testing by quantitative real-time PCR.

Authors:  Wade K Aldous; June I Pounder; Joann L Cloud; Gail L Woods
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Adverse clinical and economic outcomes attributable to methicillin resistance among patients with Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection.

Authors:  John J Engemann; Yehuda Carmeli; Sara E Cosgrove; Vance G Fowler; Melissa Z Bronstein; Sharon L Trivette; Jane P Briggs; Daniel J Sexton; Keith S Kaye
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Reduction in the rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus acquisition in surgical wards by rapid screening for colonization: a prospective, cross-over study.

Authors:  Katherine Hardy; Charlotte Price; Ala Szczepura; Savita Gossain; Ruth Davies; Nigel Stallard; Sahida Shabir; Claire McMurray; Andrew Bradbury; Peter M Hawkey
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 8.067

8.  Comparison of mortality associated with methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sara E Cosgrove; George Sakoulas; Eli N Perencevich; Mitchell J Schwaber; Adolf W Karchmer; Yehuda Carmeli
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2002-12-13       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Reduction in wound infection rates by wound surveillance with postdischarge follow-up and feedback.

Authors:  A P R Wilson; B Hodgson; M Liu; D Plummer; I Taylor; J Roberts; M Jit; C Sherlaw-Johnson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Evaluation of rapid screening and pre-emptive contact isolation for detecting and controlling methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in critical care: an interventional cohort study.

Authors:  Stephan Harbarth; Cristina Masuet-Aumatell; Jacques Schrenzel; Patrice Francois; Christophe Akakpo; Gesuele Renzi; Jerome Pugin; Bara Ricou; Didier Pittet
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of the BD Max methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) assay and the BD GeneOhm MRSA achromopeptidase assay with direct- and enriched-culture techniques using clinical specimens for detection of MRSA.

Authors:  Alexander H Dalpke; Marjeta Hofko; Stefan Zimmermann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Adjunctive mecA PCR for routine detection of methicillin susceptibility in clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  Chandanjit Kaur Nijjar; Melvyn Howard Smith; Ian Joseph Eltringham
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 5.948

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.