Literature DB >> 17279329

Risk perception, worry and satisfaction related to genetic counseling for hereditary cancer.

Cathrine Bjorvatn1, Geir Egil Eide, Berit Rokne Hanestad, Nina Øyen, Odd E Havik, Anniken Carlsson, Gunilla Berglund.   

Abstract

In this multi center study, genetic counseling for hereditary cancer was evaluated by assessing patients' worry, perceived risk of developing cancer and satisfaction with genetic counseling. An overall aim was to identify characteristics of vulnerable patients in order to customize genetic counseling. In addition, agreement between patients' and counselors' scores was measured. A total of 275 Norwegian patients were consecutively recruited, and 213 completed questionnaires before and after genetic counseling. Patients' perceived risk decreased after the genetic counseling session. There was incongruence between risk perception expressed as a percentage and in words. Patients were significantly less worried after counseling. Higher levels of worry were predicted by low instrumental satisfaction with counseling, high degree of perceived risk of developing cancer and younger age. In conclusion, counselors met the patients' psychological needs to a satisfactory degree during counseling. However, patients did not fully understand their risk of developing cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17279329     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-006-9061-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  44 in total

1.  Patients' subjective interpretation of risks offered in genetic counselling.

Authors:  J H Pearn
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Prenatal consultation after a fetal anomaly scan: videotaped exploration of physician's attitude and patient's satisfaction.

Authors:  J A Hunfeld; A Leurs; M De Jong; M L Oberstein; A Tibben; J W Wladimiroff; H I Wildschut; J Passchier
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Interest in genetic testing among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  A Y Kinney; Y A Choi; B DeVellis; E Kobetz; R C Millikan; R S Sandler
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Correlates of psychologic distress in colorectal cancer patients undergoing genetic testing for hereditary colon cancer.

Authors:  S W Vernon; E R Gritz; S K Peterson; C I Amos; C A Perz; W F Baile; P M Lynch
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Survival in prospectively ascertained familial breast cancer: analysis of a series stratified by tumour characteristics, BRCA mutations and oophorectomy.

Authors:  Pål Møller; Ake Borg; D Gareth Evans; Neva Haites; Marta M Reis; Hans Vasen; Elaine Anderson; C Michael Steel; Jaran Apold; David Goudie; Anthony Howell; Fiona Lalloo; Lovise Maehle; Helen Gregory; Ketil Heimdal
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2002-10-20       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 6.  Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Jon Emery; Fiona Walter; A Toby Prevost; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Psychosocial issues associated with genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk: an integrative review.

Authors:  Jeannie V Pasacreta
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.176

8.  Genetic counselling for cancer and risk perception.

Authors:  Annika Lidén; Gunilla Berglund; Mats G Hansson; Richard Rosenquist; P O Sjödén; Karin Nordin
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.089

9.  The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress.

Authors:  A Cull; E D Anderson; S Campbell; J Mackay; E Smyth; M Steel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  A randomized trial of specialist genetic assessment: psychological impact on women at different levels of familial breast cancer risk.

Authors:  K Brain; P Norman; J Gray; C Rogers; R Mansel; P Harper
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-01-21       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Reasons for and against participation in studies of medicinal therapies for women with breast cancer: a debate.

Authors:  Gero Luschin; Marion Habersack; Irmina-Anna Gerlich
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  Disclosing cancer genetic information within families: perspectives of counselees and their at-risk relatives.

Authors:  Afsaneh Hayat Roshanai; Claudia Lampic; Richard Rosenquist; Karin Nordin
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  The Quality of Genetic Counseling and Connected Factors as Evaluated by Male BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers in Finland.

Authors:  Outi Kajula; Maria Kääriäinen; Jukka S Moilanen; Helvi Kyngäs
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Specific psychosocial issues of individuals undergoing genetic counseling for cancer - a literature review.

Authors:  Willem Eijzenga; Daniela E E Hahn; Neil K Aaronson; Irma Kluijt; Eveline M A Bleiker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Balancing life with an increased risk of cancer: lived experiences in healthy individuals with Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Helle Vendel Petersen; Mef Nilbert; Inge Bernstein; Christina Carlsson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 7.  Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Denise M Lautenbach; Kurt D Christensen; Jeffrey A Sparks; Robert C Green
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 8.929

8.  Association of cancer worry and perceived risk with doctor avoidance: an analysis of information avoidance in a nationally representative US sample.

Authors:  Alexander Persoskie; Rebecca A Ferrer; William M P Klein
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2013-09-27

9.  Improved health perception after genetic counselling for women at high risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer: construction of new questionnaires--an Italian exploratory study.

Authors:  Chiara Catania; Irene Feroce; Monica Barile; Aron Goldhirsch; Tommaso De Pas; Filippo de Braud; Sabrina Boselli; Laura Adamoli; Davide Radice; Alessandra Rossi; Gianluca Spitaleri; Cristina Noberasco; Bernardo Bonanni
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  Risk perception after genetic counseling in patients with increased risk of cancer.

Authors:  Johanna Rantala; Ulla Platten; Gunilla Lindgren; Bo Nilsson; Brita Arver; Annika Lindblom; Yvonne Brandberg
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2009-08-23       Impact factor: 2.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.