Literature DB >> 10722992

Interest in genetic testing among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients.

A Y Kinney1, Y A Choi, B DeVellis, E Kobetz, R C Millikan, R S Sandler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The present study examined colorectal cancer screening behaviors, risk perceptions, and willingness to receive genetic testing to determine colorectal cancer susceptibility.
METHODS: We recruited 95 first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients, then conducted a brief telephone interview using a structured questionnaire that elicited information on sociodemographics, cancer screening behaviors, risk perceptions, and interest in genetic testing.
RESULTS: Among these high-risk individuals who were aged 40 years or older, only 31% reported fecal occult blood testing within the past year and 59% reported undergoing sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy within the past 5 years. The majority of participants believed their relative risk of colorectal cancer was increased (68%). Eighty-four percent of the participants indicated that they would have a genetic test if one were available. Participants who believed that <50% of colorectal cancers were caused by heredity were more likely to be interested in genetic testing than were participants who believed that 50% or more of colorectal cancers were caused by heredity. Referral source, sociodemographic factors, clinical factors, and perceived personal risk were not significantly associated with interest in genetic testing.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the demand for colorectal cancer susceptibility testing may be high among individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer. We also observed that a substantial number of first-degree relatives were not adhering to colorectal cancer screening guidelines. Accurate information on the genetic aspects of colorectal cancer and the benefits and limitations of genetic testing may help relatives of colorectal cancer patients make informed decisions about whether to undergo enhanced screening and genetic testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10722992     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00162-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  18 in total

Review 1.  Genetic risk and behavioural change.

Authors:  T M Marteau; C Lerman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-28

Review 2.  Methodology in longitudinal studies on psychological effects of predictive DNA testing: a review.

Authors:  R Timman; T Stijnen; A Tibben
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 3.  Illness representations, self-regulation, and genetic counseling: a theoretical review.

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Sharing genetic test results in Lynch syndrome: communication with close and distant relatives.

Authors:  Elena M Stoffel; Beth Ford; Rowena C Mercado; Darashana Punglia; Wendy Kohlmann; Peggy Conrad; Amie Blanco; Kristen M Shannon; Mark Powell; Stephen B Gruber; Jonathan Terdiman; Daniel C Chung; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 5.  Cancers related to genetic mutations: important psychosocial issues for Canadian family physicians.

Authors:  Tara E Power; John Robinson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Risk perception, worry and satisfaction related to genetic counseling for hereditary cancer.

Authors:  Cathrine Bjorvatn; Geir Egil Eide; Berit Rokne Hanestad; Nina Øyen; Odd E Havik; Anniken Carlsson; Gunilla Berglund
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 7.  Predictors of genetic testing decisions: a systematic review and critique of the literature.

Authors:  Kate Sweeny; Arezou Ghane; Angela M Legg; Ho Phi Huynh; Sara E Andrews
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Colorectal cancer screening among primary care patients: does risk affect screening behavior?

Authors:  Christina B Felsen; Alicja Piasecki; Jeanne M Ferrante; Pamela A Ohman-Strickland; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2011-08

9.  A mobile colonoscopic unit for lynch syndrome: trends in surveillance uptake and patient experiences of screening in a developing country.

Authors:  Zandrè Bruwer; Merle Futter; Raj Ramesar
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Patients' and professionals' opinions of services for people at an increased risk of colorectal cancer: an exploratory qualitative study.

Authors:  Tamar Stermer; Shirley Hodgson; Fred Kavalier; Sally Watts; Roger Jones
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.