Literature DB >> 26577826

Improved health perception after genetic counselling for women at high risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer: construction of new questionnaires--an Italian exploratory study.

Chiara Catania1, Irene Feroce2, Monica Barile3, Aron Goldhirsch4, Tommaso De Pas5, Filippo de Braud6, Sabrina Boselli7, Laura Adamoli8, Davide Radice9, Alessandra Rossi10, Gianluca Spitaleri11, Cristina Noberasco12, Bernardo Bonanni13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Subjects referred to genetic counselling for cancer may have heightened perceptions of illness and death, even though they are healthy and this may cause anxiety and reluctance to follow through with consultation. We investigated such perceptions before and after counselling and genetic testing for cancer in a cohort of Italian women. We sought to understand the situation of the women referred by designing questionnaires administered to women at high risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer (those who had had a pathogenic mutation identified in a family member via diagnostic testing). We also assessed women after the diagnosis of breast cancers, but free of disease, to help determine risks in their families.
METHODS: The first questionnaires were administered before initial counselling, and the second were completed within 20 days after the counselling. When a genetic test was proposed, the individual was asked to fill in a third questionnaire; the final questionnaire was administered after the person had received the results of the genetic test.
RESULTS: We evaluated 204 subjects. Before counselling, 89 % of the subjects were worried about their risk of disease, 52 % felt "different" because of their personal and family history, and 39 % declared that their life choices were influenced by their fear of cancer. After counselling, 82 % of the subjects felt more relived about their pre-existing fears and stated that this process of being seen in a clinic with genetic expertise had clarified the meaning of disease risk for them, and for 50 %, this experience had positively influenced their life choices. Thirty percentage of the subjects had a positive test; all of them felt safer in being cared for by specifically trained staff. Fifty percentage had a less informative test (e.g. "wild-type" gene found); 84 % of them were not worried by the uncertainty, and overall, 96 % considered counselling to be very useful.
CONCLUSION: Candidates for genetic counselling frequently had heightened their perception of being ill, which influenced their ability to make life decisions. Genetic counselling often improves this perception, especially in subjects who have negative tests and this knowledge facilitates their life plans. After testing, most women felt satisfied and safer because of being properly followed by professionally trained and sympathetic staff. In conclusion, knowledge of the real individual risk, the presence of a professional team, and the possibility of entering a programme of controlled screening enable patients rather than living in fear and uncertainty to be less anxious about their state of health and to live with the knowledge that they are doing everything possible to care for themselves, aided by a specialized team, and that, if necessary, they would be able to take part in investigational studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Cancer risk; Genetic counselling; Health perception

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26577826     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-015-2062-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  35 in total

Review 1.  Treating people with information: an analysis and review of approaches to communicating health risk information.

Authors:  A J Rothman; M T Kiviniemi
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1999

2.  Psychological support needs for women at high genetic risk of breast cancer: some preliminary indicators.

Authors:  P Hopwood; F Keeling; A Long; C Pool; G Evans; A Howell
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews.

Authors:  J P Struewing; P Hartge; S Wacholder; S M Baker; M Berlin; M McAdams; M M Timmerman; L C Brody; M A Tucker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  A brief assessment of concerns associated with genetic testing for cancer: the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) questionnaire.

Authors:  David Cella; Chanita Hughes; Amy Peterman; Chih-Hung Chang; Beth N Peshkin; Marc D Schwartz; Lari Wenzel; Amy Lemke; Alfred C Marcus; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D Ford; D F Easton; M Stratton; S Narod; D Goldgar; P Devilee; D T Bishop; B Weber; G Lenoir; J Chang-Claude; H Sobol; M D Teare; J Struewing; A Arason; S Scherneck; J Peto; T R Rebbeck; P Tonin; S Neuhausen; R Barkardottir; J Eyfjord; H Lynch; B A Ponder; S A Gayther; M Zelada-Hedman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Feeling at risk: how women interpret their familial breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Sandra van Dijk; Wilma Otten; Christi J van Asperen; Danielle R M Timmermans; Aad Tibben; Moniek W Zoeteweij; Sylvia Silberg; Martijn H Breuning; Job Kievit
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  Genetic counseling for families with inherited susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  B B Biesecker; M Boehnke; K Calzone; D S Markel; J E Garber; F S Collins; B L Weber
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-04-21       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Risk perception among women receiving genetic counseling: a population-based follow-up study.

Authors:  Ellen M Mikkelsen; Lone Sunde; Christoffer Johansen; Søren P Johnsen
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  2007

9.  Breast and ovarian cancer incidence in BRCA1-mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D F Easton; D Ford; D T Bishop
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 10.  Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Jon Emery; Fiona Walter; A Toby Prevost; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

View more
  3 in total

1.  Women with Family History of Breast Cancer: How Much Are They Aware of Their Risk?

Authors:  Memnun Seven; Gülcan Bağcivan; Aygul Akyuz; Ferdağ Bölükbaş
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Risk Perception and Psychological Distress in Genetic Counselling for Hereditary Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  G Cicero; R De Luca; P Dorangricchia; G Lo Coco; C Guarnaccia; D Fanale; V Calò; A Russo
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Evaluation of the template letter regarding the disclosure of genetic information within the family in France.

Authors:  Cécile Zordan; Laetitia Monteil; Emmanuelle Haquet; Christophe Cordier; Eva Toussaint; Pauline Roche; Virginie Dorian; Aline Maillard; Edouard Lhomme; Laura Richert; Laurent Pasquier; Linda Akloul; Nicolas Taris; Didier Lacombe
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-03-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.