Literature DB >> 12237897

Survival in prospectively ascertained familial breast cancer: analysis of a series stratified by tumour characteristics, BRCA mutations and oophorectomy.

Pål Møller1, Ake Borg, D Gareth Evans, Neva Haites, Marta M Reis, Hans Vasen, Elaine Anderson, C Michael Steel, Jaran Apold, David Goudie, Anthony Howell, Fiona Lalloo, Lovise Maehle, Helen Gregory, Ketil Heimdal.   

Abstract

Dedicated clinics have been established for the early diagnosis and treatment of women at risk for inherited breast cancer, but the effects of such interventions are currently unproven. This second report on prospectively diagnosed inherited breast cancer from the European collaborating centres supports the previous conclusions and adds information on genetic heterogeneity and the effect of oophorectomy. Of 249 patients, 20% had carcinoma in situ (CIS), 54% had infiltrating cancer without spread (CaN0) and 26% had cancer with spread (CaN+). Five-year survival was 100% for CIS, 94% for CaN0 and 72% for CaN+ (p = 0.007). Thirty-six patients had BRCA1 mutations, and 8 had BRCA2 mutations. Presence of BRCA1 mutation was associated with infiltrating cancer, high grade and lack of oestrogen receptor (p < 0.05 for all 3 characteristics). For BRCA1 mutation carriers, 5-year survival was 63% vs. 91% for noncarriers (p = 0.04). For CaN0 patients, mutation carriers had 75% 5-year disease-free survival vs. 96% for noncarriers (p = 0.01). Twenty-one of the mutation carriers had undergone prophylactic oophorectomy, prior to or within 6 months of diagnosis in 13 cases. All but 1 relapse occurred in the 15 who had kept their ovaries, (p < 0.01); no relapse occurred in those who had removed the ovaries within 6 months (p = 0.04) Contralateral cancer was more frequently observed in mutation noncarriers, but this finding did not reach statistical significance. Our findings support the concept that BRCA1 cancer is biologically different from other inherited breast cancers. While current screening protocols appear satisfactory for the majority of women at risk of familial breast cancer, this may not be the case for BRCA1 mutation carriers. The observed effect of oophorectomy was striking. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12237897     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.10641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  30 in total

Review 1.  Triple-negative breast cancer: present challenges and new perspectives.

Authors:  Franca Podo; Lutgarde M C Buydens; Hadassa Degani; Riet Hilhorst; Edda Klipp; Ingrid S Gribbestad; Sabine Van Huffel; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Jan Luts; Daniel Monleon; Geert J Postma; Nicole Schneiderhan-Marra; Filippo Santoro; Hans Wouters; Hege G Russnes; Therese Sørlie; Elda Tagliabue; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 2.  The role of BRCA mutation testing in determining breast cancer therapy.

Authors:  Alison H Trainer; Craig R Lewis; Kathy Tucker; Bettina Meiser; Michael Friedlander; Robyn L Ward
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Risk perception, worry and satisfaction related to genetic counseling for hereditary cancer.

Authors:  Cathrine Bjorvatn; Geir Egil Eide; Berit Rokne Hanestad; Nina Øyen; Odd E Havik; Anniken Carlsson; Gunilla Berglund
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Is no news good news? Inconclusive genetic test results in BRCA1 and BRCA2 from patients and professionals' perspectives.

Authors:  Audrey Ardern-Jones; Regina Kenen; Elly Lynch; Rebecca Doherty; Rosalind Eeles
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 2.857

5.  Psychological distress in women at risk of hereditary breast/ovarian or HNPCC cancers in the absence of demonstrated mutations.

Authors:  Amy Østertun Geirdal; Jon G Reichelt; Alv A Dahl; Ketil Heimdal; Lovise Maehle; Astrid Stormorken; Pål Møller
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 6.  Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: review and future perspectives.

Authors:  Michael P Lux; Peter A Fasching; Matthias W Beckmann
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2005-11-11       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Towards evidence-based management of inherited breast and breast-ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Pål Møller
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 2.857

8.  Classical and Novel Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer and their Clinical Significance.

Authors:  Pankaj Taneja; Dejan Maglic; Fumitake Kai; Sinan Zhu; Robert D Kendig; Elizabeth A Fry; Kazushi Inoue
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2010-04-20

Review 9.  BRCA1 functions as a breast stem cell regulator.

Authors:  W D Foulkes
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.318

10.  Quality of life and its relation to cancer-related stress in women of families with hereditary cancer without demonstrated mutation.

Authors:  Amy Østertun Geirdal; Lovise Maehle; Ketil Heimdal; Astrid Stormorken; Pål Møller; Alv A Dahl
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.