Literature DB >> 17279045

Unconstrained tripolar hip implants: effect on hip stability.

Olivier Guyen1, Qing Shan Chen, Jacques Bejui-Hugues, Daniel J Berry, Kai-Nan An.   

Abstract

Tripolar implants were developed to treat unstable total hip arthroplasties. However, there is limited confirmation that they achieve this purpose despite their increasing use. Because they have a larger effective head size, these implants are expected to increase range of motion to impingement and improve stability in situations at risk for impingement compared with conventional implants. We assessed the range of motion to impingement using a tripolar implant mounted to an automated hip simulator using 22.2-mm and 28-mm femoral head sizes. The 22 and 28-mm tripolar implants provided increases of 30.5 degrees in flexion, 15.4 degrees in adduction, and 22.4 degrees in external rotation compared with the conventional 22.2-mm femoral head diameter implant. At the critical position of 90 degrees hip flexion, there was an increase of 45.2 degrees in internal rotation. At 0 degrees and 30 degrees external rotation, extension increases were 18.8 degrees and 7.8 degrees, respectively. Bony impingement was the limiting factor. Tripolar implants increased the arc of motion before impingement in positions at risk for dislocation and are expected to provide greater stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17279045     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000238796.59596.1f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  26 in total

1.  Is a cementless dual mobility socket in primary THA a reasonable option?

Authors:  Moussa Hamadouche; Hervé Arnould; Bertrand Bouxin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The use of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation.

Authors:  Moussa Hamadouche; David J Biau; Denis Huten; Thierry Musset; François Gaucher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  One lesson from arthroplasty to osseointegration in search for better fixation of in-bone implanted prosthesis.

Authors:  Mark Pitkin
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

4.  The use of a dual-articulation acetabular cup system to prevent dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 384 cases at a mean follow-up of 15 years.

Authors:  Remi Philippot; Jean Philippe Camilleri; Bertrand Boyer; Philippe Adam; Frederic Farizon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Use of a dual mobility socket to manage total hip arthroplasty instability.

Authors:  Olivier Guyen; Vincent Pibarot; Gualter Vaz; Christophe Chevillotte; Jacques Béjui-Hugues
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  [Use of dual mobility cups for revision hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  E Röhner; G Matziolis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 7.  Biomechanical concept and clinical outcome of dual mobility cups.

Authors:  Aron Grazioli; Eugene Teow Hin Ek; Hannes Andreas Rüdiger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Instability after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brian C Werner; Thomas E Brown
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2012-08-18

Review 9.  Wear of dual-mobility cups: a review article.

Authors:  Anna Di Laura; Harry Hothi; Clement Battisti; Arianna Cerquiglini; Johann Henckel; John Skinner; Alister Hart
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  Dual-mobility arthroplasty failure: a rationale review of causes and technical considerations for revision.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; Arnaud Dubory; Damien Potage; François Roubineau; Charles Henri Flouzat Lachaniette
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.