Literature DB >> 17267723

Adequacy of communicating results from screening mammograms to African American and White women.

Beth A Jones1, Kam Reams, Lisa Calvocoressi, Amy Dailey, Stanislav V Kasl, Nancy M Liston.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We examined whether African American women were as likely as White women to receive the results of a recent mammogram and to self-report results that matched the mammography radiology report (i.e., were adequately communicated). We also sought to determine whether the adequacy of communication was the same for normal and abnormal results.
METHODS: From a prospective cohort study of mammography screening, we compared self-reported mammogram results, which were collected by telephone interview, to results listed in the radiology record of 411 African American and 734 White women who underwent screening in 5 hospital-based facilities in Connecticut between October 1996 and January 1998. Using multivariate logistic regression, we identified independent predictors of inadequate communication of mammography results.
RESULTS: It was significantly more common for African American women to experience inadequate communication of screening mammography results compared with White women, after adjustment for sociodemographic, access-to-care, biomedical, and psychosocial factors. Abnormal mammogram results resulted in inadequate communication for African American women but not White women (P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: African American women may not be receiving the full benefit of screening mammograms because of inadequate communication of results, particularly when mammography results are abnormal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17267723      PMCID: PMC1805005          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.076349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  24 in total

1.  NCI remains committed to current mammography guidelines.

Authors:  Andrew C Von Eschenbach
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2002

2.  Cultural factors in preventive care: African-Americans.

Authors:  Deborah Witt; Rickie Brawer; James Plumb
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.907

Review 3.  Mammography screening in African American women: evaluating the research.

Authors:  Beth A Jones; Elizabeth A Patterson; Lisa Calvocoressi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Epidemiology, stage at diagnosis, and tumor biology of breast carcinoma in multiracial and multiethnic populations.

Authors:  C P Hunter
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Applying recursive partitioning to a prospective study of factors associated with adherence to mammography screening guidelines.

Authors:  Lisa Calvocoressi; Marilyn Stolar; Stanislav V Kasl; Elizabeth B Claus; Beth A Jones
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 6.  Impacting cultural attitudes in African-American women to decrease breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  Donald R Lannin; Holly F Mathews; Jim Mitchell; Melvin S Swanson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 7.  Health literacy and cancer communication.

Authors:  Terry C Davis; Mark V Williams; Estela Marin; Ruth M Parker; Jonathan Glass
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Realizing the promise of breast cancer screening: clinical follow-up after abnormal screening among Black women.

Authors:  Jon F Kerner; Michael Yedidia; Deborah Padgett; Barbara Muth; Kathleen Shakira Washington; Mariella Tefft; K Robin Yabroff; Erini Makariou; Harold Freeman; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Gauging the impact of breast carcinoma screening in terms of tumor size and death rate.

Authors:  James S Michaelson; Sameer Satija; Daniel Kopans; Richard Moore; Melvin Silverstein; Arthur Comegno; Kevin Hughes; Alphonse Taghian; Simon Powell; Barbara Smith
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of health services: bias, preferences, or poor communication?

Authors:  Carol M Ashton; Paul Haidet; Debora A Paterniti; Tracie C Collins; Howard S Gordon; Kimberly O'Malley; Laura A Petersen; Barbara F Sharf; Maria E Suarez-Almazor; Nelda P Wray; Richard L Street
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  18 in total

1.  Urban women's preferences for learning of their mammogram result: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Erin N Marcus; Darlene Drummond; Noella Dietz
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Contemporary environmental and occupational health issues: more breadth and depth.

Authors:  Michael R Greenberg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Does gender discrimination impact regular mammography screening? Findings from the race differences in screening mammography study.

Authors:  Amy B Dailey; Stanislav V Kasl; Beth A Jones
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Racial/ethnic disparities in time to follow-up after an abnormal mammogram.

Authors:  Rebecca Press; Olveen Carrasquillo; Robert R Sciacca; Elsa-Grace V Giardina
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Are there racial/ethnic disparities among women younger than 40 undergoing mammography?

Authors:  Julie M Kapp; Rod Walker; Sebastien Haneuse; Diana S M Buist; Bonnie C Yankaskas
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Perceived Race as Variable: Moderating Relationship Between Perceived Discrimination in the Workplace and Mentally Unhealthy Days.

Authors:  Alexis Jemal; Myrtho Gardiner; Katharine Bloeser
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2018-08-23

7.  Influence of false-positive mammography results on subsequent screening: do physician recommendations buffer negative effects?

Authors:  Jessica T DeFrank; Barbara K Rimer; J Michael Bowling; Jo Anne Earp; Erica S Breslau; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.136

8.  How do breast imaging centers communicate results to women with limited English proficiency and other barriers to care?

Authors:  Erin N Marcus; Tulay Koru-Sengul; Feng Miao; Monica Yepes; Lee Sanders
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2014-06

9.  Timeliness of breast cancer diagnosis and initiation of treatment in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1996-2005.

Authors:  Lisa C Richardson; Janet Royalty; William Howe; William Helsel; William Kammerer; Vicki B Benard
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Factors influencing time to diagnosis after abnormal mammography in diverse women.

Authors:  Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Aimee Afable-Munsuz; Celia Patricia Kaplan; Lydia Pace; Cathy Samayoa; Carol Somkin; Dana Nickleach; Marion Lee; Leticia Márquez-Magaña; Teresa Juarbe; Rena J Pasick
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.