Literature DB >> 23324987

How do breast imaging centers communicate results to women with limited English proficiency and other barriers to care?

Erin N Marcus1, Tulay Koru-Sengul, Feng Miao, Monica Yepes, Lee Sanders.   

Abstract

Research suggests that women with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) and ethnic minority women are at increased risk of being inadequately informed of their mammogram result. The purpose of this study is to explore breast imaging centers' communication practices and assess how these centers accommodate women with low literacy and LEP. A 35-question survey was distributed to a national association of more than 700 breast health centers. Descriptive analysis of the overall sample and Fisher's exact or Chi squared testing to distinguish differences between subgroups were performed. Respondents from 206 centers completed questionnaires. 29% of respondents stated that more than a quarter of their patients were black, 27% of respondents stated that more than a quarter of their patients were Hispanic/Latina, and 13% of respondents stated that more than a quarter of their patients had LEP. Overall, 18% of respondents reported they do not routinely telephone patients with results, 15% do not have multilingual staff or translators available to answer questions, and 69% send result letters in English only. Of note, 69% use patient navigators. Centers reported systemic strengths and barriers to clear communication of mammography results. Our findings are consistent with past investigations identifying a general need to improve the communication of breast imaging results and suggesting that result notification letters alone are inadequate in ensuring that every woman understands her personal results and follow-up plan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23324987      PMCID: PMC4778389          DOI: 10.1007/s10903-012-9771-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health        ISSN: 1557-1912


  38 in total

1.  Print information to inform decisions about mammography screening participation in 16 countries with population-based programs.

Authors:  Jane G Zapka; Berta M Geller; Jean-Luc Bulliard; Jacques Fracheboud; Helene Sancho-Garnier; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-10

2.  Barriers to repeat mammography: cultural perspectives of African-American, Asian, and Hispanic women.

Authors:  Beverly Moy; Elyse R Park; Sandra Feibelmann; Sylvia Chiang; Joel S Weissman
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Timely care after an abnormal mammogram among low-income women in a public breast cancer screening program.

Authors:  Rebecca Lobb; Jennifer D Allen; Karen M Emmons; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-03-16

4.  Patient navigation and case management following an abnormal mammogram: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Kathleen Ell; Betsy Vourlekis; Pey-Jiuan Lee; Bin Xie
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Evaluation of factors potentially associated with inadequate follow-up of mammographic abnormalities.

Authors:  B D McCarthy; M U Yood; N K Janz; E A Boohaker; R E Ward; C C Johnson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Interpreter use and satisfaction with interpersonal aspects of care for Spanish-speaking patients.

Authors:  D W Baker; R Hayes; J P Fortier
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  An assessment of the likelihood, frequency, and content of verbal communication between radiologists and women receiving screening and diagnostic mammography.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Mark Kettler; Andrea J Cook; Berta M Geller; Leah Karliner; Diana L Miglioretti; Erin Aiello Bowles; Diana S Buist; Thomas H Gallagher; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Processes of care in cervical and breast cancer screening and follow-up--the importance of communication.

Authors:  Jane G Zapka; Elaine Puleo; Stephen H Taplin; Karin Valentine Goins; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Judy Mouchawar; Carol Somkin; M Michele Manos
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Women's and residents' experiences of communication in the diagnostic mammography suite.

Authors:  Beth A Lown; Elizabeth Roy; Phyllis Gorman; J Pierre Sasson
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-10-09

10.  Comprehensive diagnostic program for medically underserved women with abnormal breast screening evaluations in an urban population.

Authors:  Frances M Palmieri; Elizabeth R DePeri; Betty A Mincey; Judith A Smith; Lonnie K Wen; Deborah M Chewar; Reza Abaya; Gerardo Colon-Otero; Edith A Perez
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 7.616

View more
  12 in total

1.  Psychological distress, social withdrawal, and coping following receipt of an abnormal mammogram among different ethnicities: a mediation model.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Shirley A A Beresford; Noah Espinoza; Beti Thompson
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.172

2.  English Language Abilities and Unmet Needs in Community Mental Health Services: a Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Anna Durbin; Frank Sirotich; Janet Durbin
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.505

3.  Communication Practices of Mammography Facilities and Timely Follow-up of a Screening Mammogram with a BI-RADS 0 Assessment.

Authors:  Marilyn M Schapira; William E Barlow; Emily F Conant; Brian L Sprague; Anna N A Tosteson; Jennifer S Haas; Tracy Onega; Elisabeth F Beaber; Martha Goodrich; Anne Marie McCarthy; Sally D Herschorn; Celette Sugg Skinner; Tory O Harrington; Berta Geller
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Radiology and patient communication: if not now, then when?

Authors:  Julie Cox; Yitka Graham
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  The early dissemination of patient navigation interventions: results of a respondent-driven sample survey.

Authors:  Patricia A Valverde; Elizabeth Calhoun; Angelina Esparza; Kristen J Wells; Betsy C Risendal
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 6.  Breast cancer interventions serving US-based Latinas: current approaches and directions.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Beti Thompson; Noah Espinoza; Rachel Ceballos
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2013-07

7.  Disparities in abnormal mammogram follow-up time for Asian women compared with non-Hispanic white women and between Asian ethnic groups.

Authors:  Kim H Nguyen; Rena J Pasick; Susan L Stewart; Karla Kerlikowske; Leah S Karliner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  A Qualitative Study of Spanish-Speakers' Experience with Dense Breast Notifications in a Massachusetts Safety-Net Hospital.

Authors:  Christine M Gunn; Amy Fitzpatrick; Sarah Waugh; Michelle Carrera; Nancy R Kressin; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Tracy A Battaglia
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Understanding the patient-provider communication needs and experiences of Latina and non-Latina White women following an abnormal mammogram.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Sarah D Hohl; Linda K Ko; Edgar A Rodriguez; Beti Thompson; Shirley A A Beresford
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Engaging Women with Limited Health Literacy in Mammography Decision-Making: Perspectives of Patients and Primary Care Providers.

Authors:  Christine M Gunn; Ariel Maschke; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Nancy R Kressin; Mara A Schonberg; Tracy A Battaglia
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.