Literature DB >> 16221800

Applying recursive partitioning to a prospective study of factors associated with adherence to mammography screening guidelines.

Lisa Calvocoressi1, Marilyn Stolar, Stanislav V Kasl, Elizabeth B Claus, Beth A Jones.   

Abstract

Although a number of predictors of adherence to mammography screening guidelines have been identified using traditional statistical methods, many women are not screening according to these guidelines. Recursive partitioning may aid in developing novel intervention strategies to promote this screening behavior by identifying subgroups of women that differ on adherence across predictor variables. In a prospective study of 1,229 African-American and White women in Connecticut whose adherence to mammography screening guidelines was ascertained over a 26-month follow-up period from initial screening in 1996-1998, recursive partitioning selected six of 22 candidate predictors and identified subgroups that differed on adherence across predictors by age (40-49 and 50-79 years). Among the five subgroups identified for women aged 50-79 years, the subgroup most adherent to screening guidelines during follow-up included four predictors: a history of adherence, annual family income of 15,000 dollars or more, a belief that mammograms were very useful, and low or moderate perceived breast cancer susceptibility. Among the three subgroups identified for women aged 40-49 years, the most adherent subgroup included only one predictor: receipt of a health-care provider's recommendation to obtain a mammogram. These findings suggest that recursive partitioning may be a useful statistical tool and may aid in developing interventions to promote adherence to mammography screening guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16221800     DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwi337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  14 in total

1.  Pathways to early coital debut for adolescent girls: a recursive partitioning analysis.

Authors:  Matthew R Pearson; Tatyana Kholodkov; James M Henson; Emily A Impett
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2011-05-24

2.  Adequacy of communicating results from screening mammograms to African American and White women.

Authors:  Beth A Jones; Kam Reams; Lisa Calvocoressi; Amy Dailey; Stanislav V Kasl; Nancy M Liston
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Does gender discrimination impact regular mammography screening? Findings from the race differences in screening mammography study.

Authors:  Amy B Dailey; Stanislav V Kasl; Beth A Jones
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Concordance of population-based estimates of mammography screening.

Authors:  Denise M Boudreau; Casey L Luce; Evette Ludman; Amy E Bonomi; Paul A Fishman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Continuum of mammography use among US women: classification tree analysis.

Authors:  Annie Gjelsvik; Michelle L Rogers; Melissa A Clark; Hernando C Ombao; William Rakowski
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2014-07

6.  Longitudinal predictors of nonadherence to maintenance of mammography.

Authors:  Jennifer M Gierisch; Jo Anne Earp; Noel T Brewer; Barbara K Rimer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Factors Associated with Colorectal Cancer Screening among Younger African American Men: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Charles R Rogers; Patricia Goodson; Margaret J Foster
Journal:  J Health Dispar Res Pract       Date:  2015

8.  Predicting future depression in adolescents using the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire: a two-nation study.

Authors:  Dean P McKenzie; John W Toumbourou; Andrew B Forbes; Andrew J Mackinnon; Barbara J McMorris; Richard F Catalano; George C Patton
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 4.839

9.  Skin cancer concerns and genetic risk information-seeking in primary care.

Authors:  J Hay; K A Kaphingst; R Baser; Y Li; S Hensley-Alford; C M McBride
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Perceived risk of breast cancer among Latinas attending community clinics: risk comprehension and relationship with mammography adherence.

Authors:  Kristi D Graves; Elmer Huerta; Jennifer Cullen; Elizabeth Kaufman; Vanessa Sheppard; George Luta; Claudine Isaacs; Marc D Schwartz; Jeanne Mandelblatt
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.