Literature DB >> 12855208

Realizing the promise of breast cancer screening: clinical follow-up after abnormal screening among Black women.

Jon F Kerner1, Michael Yedidia, Deborah Padgett, Barbara Muth, Kathleen Shakira Washington, Mariella Tefft, K Robin Yabroff, Erini Makariou, Harold Freeman, Jeanne S Mandelblatt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Delayed or incomplete follow-up after abnormal screening results may compromise the effectiveness of breast cancer screening programs, particularly in medically underserved and minority populations. This study examined the role of socioeconomic status, breast cancer risk factors, health care system barriers, and patient cognitive-attitudinal factors in the timing of diagnostic resolution after abnormal breast cancer screening exams among Black women receiving breast cancer screening at three New York city clinics.
METHODS: We identified 184 Black women as having an abnormal mammogram or clinical breast exam requiring immediate follow-up and they were interviewed and their medical records examined. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between patient and health care system factors and diagnostic resolution within 3 months of the abnormal finding.
RESULTS: Within 3 months, 39% of women were without diagnostic resolution and 28% within 6 months. Neither socioeconomic status nor system barriers were associated with timely diagnostic resolution. Timely resolution was associated with mammogram severity, patients asking questions (OR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.25-5.96), or receiving next step information (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.08-6.21) at the initial mammogram. Women with prior breast abnormalities were less likely to complete timely diagnostic resolution (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.20-0.85), as were women with higher levels of cancer anxiety (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.27-0.92).
CONCLUSIONS: Interventions that address a woman's prior experience with abnormal findings and improve patient/provider communication may improve timely and appropriate follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12855208     DOI: 10.1016/s0091-7435(03)00087-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  30 in total

1.  Urban women's preferences for learning of their mammogram result: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Erin N Marcus; Darlene Drummond; Noella Dietz
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  Interventions to improve follow-up of abnormal findings in cancer screening.

Authors:  Roshan Bastani; K Robin Yabroff; Ronald E Myers; Beth Glenn
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Psychosocial determinants of mammography follow-up after receipt of abnormal mammography results in medically underserved women.

Authors:  Alecia Malin Fair; Debra Wujcik; Jin-Mann Sally Lin; Wei Zheng; Kathleen M Egan; Ana M Grau; Victoria L Champion; Kenneth A Wallston
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2010-02

4.  Adequacy of communicating results from screening mammograms to African American and White women.

Authors:  Beth A Jones; Kam Reams; Lisa Calvocoressi; Amy Dailey; Stanislav V Kasl; Nancy M Liston
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Early referral to supportive care specialists for symptom burden in lung cancer patients: a comparison of non-Hispanic whites, Hispanics, and non-Hispanic blacks.

Authors:  Cielito C Reyes-Gibby; Karen O Anderson; Sanjay Shete; Eduardo Bruera; Sriram Yennurajalingam
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Racial/ethnic disparities in time to follow-up after an abnormal mammogram.

Authors:  Rebecca Press; Olveen Carrasquillo; Robert R Sciacca; Elsa-Grace V Giardina
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  How do breast imaging centers communicate results to women with limited English proficiency and other barriers to care?

Authors:  Erin N Marcus; Tulay Koru-Sengul; Feng Miao; Monica Yepes; Lee Sanders
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2014-06

8.  Time to diagnosis and breast cancer stage by race/ethnicity.

Authors:  Erica T Warner; Rulla M Tamimi; Melissa E Hughes; Rebecca A Ottesen; Yu-Ning Wong; Stephen B Edge; Richard L Theriault; Douglas W Blayney; Joyce C Niland; Eric P Winer; Jane C Weeks; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Diagnostic resolution of cancer screening abnormalities at community health centers.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Ji-Hyun Lee; Ercilia R Calcano; Cathy D Meade; William J Fulp; Kristen J Wells
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-08

10.  Impact of patient navigation on cancer diagnostic resolution among Northwest Tribal communities.

Authors:  Victoria Warren-Mears; Jenine Dankovchik; Meena Patil; Rongwei Fu
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.