Literature DB >> 18321171

Does gender discrimination impact regular mammography screening? Findings from the race differences in screening mammography study.

Amy B Dailey1, Stanislav V Kasl, Beth A Jones.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: ABSTRACT Objective: To determine if gender discrimination, conceptualized as a negative life stressor, is a deterrent to adherence to mammography screening guidelines.
METHODS: African American and white women (1451) aged 40-79 years who obtained an index screening mammogram at one of five urban hospitals in Connecticut between October 1996 and January 1998 were enrolled in this study. This logistic regression analysis includes the 1229 women who completed telephone interviews at baseline and follow-up (average 29.4 months later) and for whom the study outcome, nonadherence to age-specific mammography screening guidelines, was determined. Gender discrimination was measured as lifetime experience in seven possible situations.
RESULTS: Gender discrimination, reported by nearly 38% of the study population, was significantly associated with nonadherence to mammography guidelines in women with annual family incomes of > or =$50,000 (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.33, 2.98) and did not differ across racial/ethnic group.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that gender discrimination can adversely influence regular mammography screening in some women. With nearly half of women nonadherent to screening mammography guidelines in this study and with decreasing mammography rates nationwide, it is important to address the complexity of nonadherence across subgroups of women. Life stressors, such as experiences of gender discrimination, may have considerable consequences, potentially influencing health prevention prioritization in women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18321171      PMCID: PMC3086046          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2006.0257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  33 in total

1.  Racism as a stressor for African Americans. A biopsychosocial model.

Authors:  R Clark; N B Anderson; V R Clark; D R Williams
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1999-10

2.  Is variation in quality of mammographic services race linked?

Authors:  B A Jones; C S Culler; S V Kasl; L Calvocoressi
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2001-02

3.  Distinguishing sexual harassment from discrimination: a factor-analytic study of residents' reports.

Authors:  D C Baldwin; S R Daugherty
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 4.  Repeat mammography: prevalence estimates and considerations for assessment.

Authors:  Melissa A Clark; William Rakowski; Laura B Bonacore
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2003-12

5.  American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Debbie Saslow; Kimberly Andrews Sawyer; Wylie Burke; Mary E Costanza; W Phil Evans; Roger S Foster; Edward Hendrick; Harmon J Eyre; Steven Sener
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 6.  Mammography screening in African American women: evaluating the research.

Authors:  Beth A Jones; Elizabeth A Patterson; Lisa Calvocoressi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Maria C Katapodi; Kathy A Lee; Noreen C Facione; Marylin J Dodd
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  What is so bad about a little name-calling? Negative consequences of gender harassment for overperformance demands and distress.

Authors:  Sharon K Parker; Mark A Griffin
Journal:  J Occup Health Psychol       Date:  2002-07

9.  The association between multiple domains of discrimination and self-assessed health: a multilevel analysis of Latinos and blacks in four low-income New York City neighborhoods.

Authors:  Jennifer Stuber; Sandro Galea; Jennifer Ahern; Shannon Blaney; Crystal Fuller
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 10.  Fear, anxiety, worry, and breast cancer screening behavior: a critical review.

Authors:  Nathan S Consedine; Carol Magai; Yulia S Krivoshekova; Lynn Ryzewicz; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  6 in total

1.  Perceived Discrimination and Longitudinal Change in Kidney Function Among Urban Adults.

Authors:  May A Beydoun; Angedith Poggi-Burke; Alan B Zonderman; Ola S Rostant; Michele K Evans; Deidra C Crews
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.312

2.  Critical consciousness, racial and gender discrimination, and HIV disease markers in African American women with HIV.

Authors:  Gwendolyn A Kelso; Mardge H Cohen; Kathleen M Weber; Sannisha K Dale; Ruth C Cruise; Leslie R Brody
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2014-07

3.  Neighborhood- and individual-level socioeconomic variation in perceptions of racial discrimination.

Authors:  Amy B Dailey; Stanislav V Kasl; Theodore R Holford; Tene T Lewis; Beth A Jones
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Patients' perceptions of discrimination during hospitalization.

Authors:  Patricia Hudelson; Véronique Kolly; Thomas Perneger
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Perceived discrimination is associated with reduced breast and cervical cancer screening: the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN).

Authors:  Elizabeth A Jacobs; Paul J Rathouz; Kelly Karavolos; Susan A Everson-Rose; Imke Janssen; Howard M Kravitz; Tené T Lewis; Lynda H Powell
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 6.  Place Is Power: Investing in Communities as a Systemic Leverage Point to Reduce Breast Cancer Disparities by Race.

Authors:  Matthew Jay Lyons; Senaida Fernandez Poole; Ross C Brownson; Rodney Lyn
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 4.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.