Literature DB >> 17264365

Computer-aided detection system for clustered microcalcifications: comparison of performance on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.

Jun Ge1, Lubomir M Hadjiiski, Berkman Sahiner, Jun Wei, Mark A Helvie, Chuan Zhou, Heang-Ping Chan.   

Abstract

We have developed a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to detect clustered microcalcifications automatically on full-field digital mammograms (FFDMs) and a CAD system for screen-film mammograms (SFMs). The two systems used the same computer vision algorithms but their false positive (FP) classifiers were trained separately with sample images of each modality. In this study, we compared the performance of the CAD systems for detection of clustered microcalcifications on pairs of FFDM and SFM obtained from the same patient. For case-based performance evaluation, the FFDM CAD system achieved detection sensitivities of 70%, 80% and 90% at an average FP cluster rate of 0.07, 0.16 and 0.63 per image, compared with an average FP cluster rate of 0.15, 0.38 and 2.02 per image for the SFM CAD system. The difference was statistically significant with the alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (AFROC) analysis. When evaluated on data sets negative for microcalcification clusters, the average FP cluster rates of the FFDM CAD system were 0.04, 0.11 and 0.33 per image at detection sensitivity level of 70%, 80% and 90% compared with an average FP cluster rate of 0.08, 0.14 and 0.50 per image for the SFM CAD system. When evaluated for malignant cases only, the difference of the performance of the two CAD systems was not statistically significant with AFROC analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17264365      PMCID: PMC2742213          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/4/008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  29 in total

1.  Computer-aided detection with screening mammography: improving performance or simply shifting the operating point?

Authors:  Jules H Sumkin; David Gur
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.

Authors:  Jun Ge; Berkman Sahiner; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Heang-Ping Chan; Jun Wei; Mark A Helvie; Chuan Zhou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Follow-up and final results of the Oslo I Study comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading.

Authors:  P Skaane; A Skjennald; K Young; E Egge; I Jebsen; E M Sager; B Scheel; E Søvik; A K Ertzaas; S Hofvind; M Abdelnoor
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.990

4.  Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces.

Authors:  H P Chan; B Sahiner; K L Lam; N Petrick; M A Helvie; M M Goodsitt; D D Adler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data.

Authors:  C E Metz; B A Herman; J H Shen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Effect of human variability on independent double reading in screening mammography.

Authors:  C A Beam; D C Sullivan; P M Layde
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Computer-aided detection of mammographic microcalcifications: pattern recognition with an artificial neural network.

Authors:  H P Chan; S C Lo; B Sahiner; K L Lam; M A Helvie
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; Constantine Gatsonis; Edward Hendrick; Martin Yaffe; Janet K Baum; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Emily F Conant; Laurie L Fajardo; Lawrence Bassett; Carl D'Orsi; Roberta Jong; Murray Rebner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Digitization requirements in mammography: effects on computer-aided detection of microcalcifications.

Authors:  H P Chan; L T Niklason; D M Ikeda; K L Lam; D D Adler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.

Authors:  Per Skaane; Corinne Balleyguier; Felix Diekmann; Susanne Diekmann; Jean-Charles Piguet; Kari Young; Loren T Niklason
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  8 in total

1.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications on planar projection images.

Authors:  Ravi K Samala; Heang-Ping Chan; Yao Lu; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Jun Wei; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Correlation of free-response and receiver-operating-characteristic area-under-the-curve estimates: results from independently conducted FROC∕ROC studies in mammography.

Authors:  Federica Zanca; Stephen L Hillis; Filip Claus; Chantal Van Ongeval; Valerie Celis; Veerle Provoost; Hong-Jun Yoon; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Urinary bladder segmentation in CT urography using deep-learning convolutional neural network and level sets.

Authors:  Kenny H Cha; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Ravi K Samala; Heang-Ping Chan; Elaine M Caoili; Richard H Cohan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Computer-aided detection system for clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis using joint information from volumetric and planar projection images.

Authors:  Ravi K Samala; Heang-Ping Chan; Yao Lu; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Jun Wei; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Improving image quality for digital breast tomosynthesis: an automated detection and diffusion-based method for metal artifact reduction.

Authors:  Yao Lu; Heang-Ping Chan; Jun Wei; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Ravi K Samala
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Analysis of computer-aided detection techniques and signal characteristics for clustered microcalcifications on digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Ravi K Samala; Heang-Ping Chan; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Bladder Cancer Treatment Response Assessment in CT using Radiomics with Deep-Learning.

Authors:  Kenny H Cha; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Heang-Ping Chan; Alon Z Weizer; Ajjai Alva; Richard H Cohan; Elaine M Caoili; Chintana Paramagul; Ravi K Samala
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Bladder Cancer Segmentation in CT for Treatment Response Assessment: Application of Deep-Learning Convolution Neural Network-A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Kenny H Cha; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Ravi K Samala; Heang-Ping Chan; Richard H Cohan; Elaine M Caoili; Chintana Paramagul; Ajjai Alva; Alon Z Weizer
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2016-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.