Literature DB >> 16964876

Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.

Jun Ge1, Berkman Sahiner, Lubomir M Hadjiiski, Heang-Ping Chan, Jun Wei, Mark A Helvie, Chuan Zhou.   

Abstract

We are developing a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to identify microcalcification clusters (MCCs) automatically on full field digital mammograms (FFDMs). The CAD system includes six stages: preprocessing; image enhancement; segmentation of microcalcification candidates; false positive (FP) reduction for individual microcalcifications; regional clustering; and FP reduction for clustered microcalcifications. At the stage of FP reduction for individual microcalcifications, a truncated sum-of-squares error function was used to improve the efficiency and robustness of the training of an artificial neural network in our CAD system for FFDMs. At the stage of FP reduction for clustered microcalcifications, morphological features and features derived from the artificial neural network outputs were extracted from each cluster. Stepwise linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was used to select the features. An LDA classifier was then used to differentiate clustered microcalcifications from FPs. A data set of 96 cases with 192 images was collected at the University of Michigan. This data set contained 96 MCCs, of which 28 clusters were proven by biopsy to be malignant and 68 were proven to be benign. The data set was separated into two independent data sets for training and testing of the CAD system in a cross-validation scheme. When one data set was used to train and validate the convolution neural network (CNN) in our CAD system, the other data set was used to evaluate the detection performance. With the use of a truncated error metric, the training of CNN could be accelerated and the classification performance was improved. The CNN in combination with an LDA classifier could substantially reduce FPs with a small tradeoff in sensitivity. By using the free-response receiver operating characteristic methodology, it was found that our CAD system can achieve a cluster-based sensitivity of 70, 80, and 90 % at 0.21, 0.61, and 1.49 FPs/image, respectively. For case-based performance evaluation, a sensitivity of 70, 80, and 90 % can be achieved at 0.07, 0.17, and 0.65 FPs/image, respectively. We also used a data set of 216 mammograms negative for clustered microcalcifications to further estimate the FP rate of our CAD system. The corresponding FP rates were 0.15, 0.31, and 0.86 FPs/image for cluster-based detection when negative mammograms were used for estimation of FP rates.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16964876     DOI: 10.1118/1.2211710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  27 in total

1.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications on planar projection images.

Authors:  Ravi K Samala; Heang-Ping Chan; Yao Lu; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Jun Wei; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: a 3D approach.

Authors:  Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Mark A Helvie; Jun Wei; Chuan Zhou; Yao Lu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Computer-aided detection system for clustered microcalcifications: comparison of performance on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.

Authors:  Jun Ge; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner; Jun Wei; Mark A Helvie; Chuan Zhou; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Characterization of mammographic masses based on level set segmentation with new image features and patient information.

Authors:  Jiazheng Shi; Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Jun Ge; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Mark A Helvie; Alexis Nees; Yi-Ta Wu; Jun Wei; Chuan Zhou; Yiheng Zhang; Jing Cui
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM.

Authors:  Maryellen L Giger; Heang-Ping Chan; John Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Automated breast mass detection in 3D reconstructed tomosynthesis volumes: a featureless approach.

Authors:  Swatee Singh; Georgia D Tourassi; Jay A Baker; Ehsan Samei; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Automated detection of microcalcification clusters for digital breast tomosynthesis using projection data only: a preliminary study.

Authors:  I Reiser; R M Nishikawa; A V Edwards; D B Kopans; R A Schmidt; J Papaioannou; R H Moore
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Application of boundary detection information in breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.

Authors:  Yiheng Zhang; Heang-Ping Chan; Berkman Sahiner; Yi-Ta Wu; Chuan Zhou; Jun Ge; Jun Wei; Lubomir M Hadjiiski
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Computer-aided detection of breast masses: four-view strategy for screening mammography.

Authors:  Jun Wei; Heang-Ping Chan; Chuan Zhou; Yi-Ta Wu; Berkman Sahiner; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Evaluation of computer-aided diagnosis on a large clinical full-field digital mammographic dataset.

Authors:  Hui Li; Maryellen L Giger; Yading Yuan; Weijie Chen; Karla Horsch; Li Lan; Andrew R Jamieson; Charlene A Sennett; Sanaz A Jansen
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.