Literature DB >> 17263072

Relationships between attentional blink magnitude, RSVP target accuracy, and performance on other cognitive tasks.

Karen M Arnell1, Ashley E Howe, Marc F Joanisse, Raymond M Klein.   

Abstract

When two masked, to-be-attended targets are presented within approximately half a second of each other, performance on the second target (T2) suffers, relative to when the targets are presented further apart in time or when the first target (T1) can be ignored. This pattern of results is known as the attentional blink (AB). Typically, participants differ with respect to the magnitude of their AB and their overall target accuracy. Despite investigations as to what participant characteristics may influence AB performance (e.g., age, brain damage, or mood state), there has been no focused examination of whether individual differences in cognitive performance measures predict the magnitude of the AB or overall rapid serial visual presentation(RSVP) target accuracy. Our university studentparticipants performed single-target and dual-target RSVP tasks, as well as a selection of cognitive tasks that did not use RSVP presentations, with color, letter, digit, and object stimuli. Overall performance on each of the RSVP targets (T1, T2, and single target) was predicted by speeded manual and vocal identification times to isolated stimuli and by performance with other RSVP targets. However, the magnitude of the AB was predicted only by T1 accuracy, not by any other performance measures. The results suggest that individual differences in AB magnitude do not result from differences in effective RSVP target encoding and are not well explained by varied information-processing abilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17263072     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  39 in total

1.  Separate and shared sources of dual-task cost in stimulus identification and response selection.

Authors:  Karen M Arnell; John Duncan
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Modulation of the attentional blink by differential resource allocation.

Authors:  D I Shore; E N Mclaughlin; R M Klein
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2001-12

3.  Attentional limitations in processing sequentially presented vibrotactile targets.

Authors:  Anne P Hillstrom; Kimron L Shapiro; Charles Spence
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-10

4.  Impairment of temporal attention in patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Chiang-shan Ray Li; Wei-hao Lin; Yong-yi Yang; Chang-ching Huang; Tso-wei Chen; Ying-cheng Chen
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-08-07       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Attentional dynamics and visual perception: mechanisms of spatial disorientation in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Voyko Kavcic; Charles J Duffy
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Dissociating sources of dual-task interference using human electrophysiology.

Authors:  Karen M Arnell; Alicia M Helion; Jessica A Hurdelbrink; Brian Pasieka
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

7.  The beneficial effect of concurrent task-irrelevant mental activity on temporal attention.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Sander Nieuwenhuis
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-04

8.  Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance.

Authors:  C S Carter; T S Braver; D M Barch; M M Botvinick; D Noll; J D Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities.

Authors:  J Duncan; S Martens; R Ward
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-06-19       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Abnormal temporal dynamics of visual attention in spatial neglect patients.

Authors:  M Husain; K Shapiro; J Martin; C Kennard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-01-09       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  14 in total

1.  How reliable is the attentional blink? Examining the relationships within and between attentional blink tasks over time.

Authors:  Gillian Dale; Karen M Arnell
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-12-13

2.  Executive control processes of working memory predict attentional blink magnitude over and above storage capacity.

Authors:  Karen M Arnell; Kirk A Stokes; Mary H MacLean; Carleen Gicante
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-12-16

3.  Changes in temporal attention inhibition following prolonged exposure and sertraline in the treatment of PTSD.

Authors:  Aileen Echiverri-Cohen; Lori A Zoellner; Robert Gallop; Norah Feeny; Jeffrey Jaeger; Michele Bedard-Gilligan
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2016-02-22

4.  Alpha, beta: The rhythm of the attentional blink.

Authors:  Kimron L Shapiro; Simon Hanslmayr; James T Enns; Alejandro Lleras
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

5.  Attentional blink and impulsiveness: evidence for higher functional impulsivity in non-blinkers compared to blinkers.

Authors:  Stefan J Troche; Thomas H Rammsayer
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-02-28

6.  Attentional blink magnitude is predicted by the ability to keep irrelevant material out of working memory.

Authors:  Karen M Arnell; Shawn M Stubitz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-11-25

7.  How does information processing speed relate to the attentional blink?

Authors:  Troy A W Visser; Jeneva L Ohan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  T1 difficulty does not modulate the magnitude of the attentional blink.

Authors:  Thomas M Spalek; Hayley E P Lagroix; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 2.138

9.  Individual differences in the attentional blink: the temporal profile of blinkers and non-blinkers.

Authors:  Charlotte Willems; Stefan M Wierda; Eva van Viegen; Sander Martens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Individual Differences in Temporal Selective Attention as Reflected in Pupil Dilation.

Authors:  Charlotte Willems; Johannes Herdzin; Sander Martens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.