Literature DB >> 19937451

Attentional blink magnitude is predicted by the ability to keep irrelevant material out of working memory.

Karen M Arnell1, Shawn M Stubitz.   

Abstract

Participants have difficulty in reporting the second of two masked targets if the second target is presented within 500 ms of the first target-an attentional blink (AB). Individual participants differ in the magnitude of their AB. The present study employed an individual differences design and two visual working memory tasks to examine whether visual working memory capacity and/or the ability to exclude irrelevant information from visual working memory (working memory filtering efficiency) could predict individual differences in the AB. Visual working memory capacity was positively related to filtering efficiency, but did not predict AB magnitude. However, the degree to which irrelevant stimuli were admitted into visual working memory (i.e., poor filtering efficiency) was positively correlated with AB magnitude over and above visual working memory capacity. Good filtering efficiency may benefit the AB by not allowing irrelevant RSVP distractors to gain access to working memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19937451     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-009-0265-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  37 in total

1.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  E K Vogel; G F Woodman; S J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

3.  The attentional blink: resource depletion or temporary loss of control?

Authors:  Vincent Di Lollo; Jun-ichiro Kawahara; S M Shahab Ghorashi; James T Enns
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-04-29

4.  The beneficial effect of concurrent task-irrelevant mental activity on temporal attention.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Sander Nieuwenhuis
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-04

5.  The beneficial effects of additional task load, positive affect, and instruction on the attentional blink.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Sander Nieuwenhuis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  A boost and bounce theory of temporal attention.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Martijn Meeter
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Andrew W McCollough; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Attentional networks.

Authors:  M I Posner; S Dehaene
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 13.837

9.  Anticipatory control of long-range phase synchronization.

Authors:  Joachim Gross; Frank Schmitz; Irmtraud Schnitzler; Klaus Kessler; Kimron Shapiro; Bernhard Hommel; Alfons Schnitzler
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  M M Chun; M C Potter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  17 in total

1.  PET evidence for a role for striatal dopamine in the attentional blink: functional implications.

Authors:  Heleen A Slagter; Rachel Tomer; Bradley T Christian; Andrew S Fox; Lorenza S Colzato; Carlye R King; Dhanabalan Murali; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  How reliable is the attentional blink? Examining the relationships within and between attentional blink tasks over time.

Authors:  Gillian Dale; Karen M Arnell
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-12-13

3.  Personality predicts temporal attention costs in the attentional blink paradigm.

Authors:  Mary H Maclean; Karen M Arnell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-08

4.  Gestalt grouping cues can improve filtering performance in visual working memory.

Authors:  Ayala S Allon; Gili Vixman; Roy Luria
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-05-29

5.  Multiple measures of dispositional global/local bias predict attentional blink magnitude.

Authors:  Gillian Dale; Karen M Arnell
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-07-11

6.  Carving executive control at its joints: Working memory capacity predicts stimulus-stimulus, but not stimulus-response, conflict.

Authors:  Matt E Meier; Michael J Kane
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Exaggerated Attention Blink Response in Prisoners with Externalizing.

Authors:  Arielle Baskin-Sommers; Richard Wolf; Joshua Buckholtz; Christopher Warren; Joseph Newman
Journal:  J Res Pers       Date:  2012-08-18

Review 8.  α-band oscillations, attention, and controlled access to stored information.

Authors:  Wolfgang Klimesch
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Distractor inhibition predicts individual differences in recovery from the attentional blink.

Authors:  Heleen A Slagter; Katerina Georgopoulou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Individual differences in the attentional blink: the temporal profile of blinkers and non-blinkers.

Authors:  Charlotte Willems; Stefan M Wierda; Eva van Viegen; Sander Martens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.