Literature DB >> 23455945

Attentional blink and impulsiveness: evidence for higher functional impulsivity in non-blinkers compared to blinkers.

Stefan J Troche1, Thomas H Rammsayer.   

Abstract

The attentional blink (AB) represents a fundamental limit of information processing. About 5-10 % of all subjects, however, do not show the AB. Because of the low base rate of these so-called non-blinkers, studies on mechanisms underlying non-blinkers' absent AB are extremely scant. The few existent studies found non-blinkers to be faster and more efficient in information processing compared to blinkers. A personality trait that has been linked previously to speed and efficiency of information processing as well as to the magnitude of the AB is impulsivity. Therefore, the present study investigated whether 15 non-blinkers and 15 blinkers differed from each other in functional and/or dysfunctional impulsivity. To obtain a better understanding of the underlying processing mechanisms, the P300 component in the event-related potential was recorded during performance on the AB task. Our results indicated higher functional impulsivity in non-blinkers compared to blinkers but no differences between the two groups in dysfunctional impulsivity. As indicated by shorter P300 latency, non-blinkers processed information faster than blinkers after the AB period but slower during the AB period. These speed effects, however, were not associated with functional impulsivity. Thus, impulsivity and speed of information processing appear to represent two rather independent sources for non-blinkers' absent AB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23455945     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-013-0553-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  30 in total

1.  From sensory processes to conscious perception.

Authors:  Justin S Feinstein; Murray B Stein; Gabriel N Castillo; Martin P Paulus
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2004-06

2.  Temporal target integration underlies performance at Lag 1 in the attentional blink.

Authors:  Elkan G Akyürek; Sander A H Eshuis; Mark R Nieuwenstein; Jefta D Saija; Deniz Başkent; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The beneficial effects of additional task load, positive affect, and instruction on the attentional blink.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Sander Nieuwenhuis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 4.  Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b.

Authors:  John Polich
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Functional and dysfunctional impulsivity: personality and cognitive correlates.

Authors:  S J Dickman
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1990-01

6.  P300, handedness, and corpus callosal size: gender, modality, and task.

Authors:  L D Hoffman; J Polich
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.997

7.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact.

Authors:  G Gratton; M G Coles; E Donchin
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-04

8.  A metric for thought: a comparison of P300 latency and reaction time.

Authors:  G McCarthy; E Donchin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-01-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  The attentional blink: past, present, and future of a blind spot in perceptual awareness.

Authors:  Sander Martens; Brad Wyble
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  The relationships between functional and dysfunctional impulsivity and aggression across different samples.

Authors:  Andreu Vigil-Colet; Fabia Morales-Vives; Jordi Tous
Journal:  Span J Psychol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.264

View more
  4 in total

1.  Individual differences in dual-target RSVP task performance relate to entrainment but not to individual alpha frequency.

Authors:  Cornelia Kranczioch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Individual differences in visual salience vary along semantic dimensions.

Authors:  Benjamin de Haas; Alexios L Iakovidis; D Samuel Schwarzkopf; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Individual Differences in Temporal Selective Attention as Reflected in Pupil Dilation.

Authors:  Charlotte Willems; Johannes Herdzin; Sander Martens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Time to see the bigger picture: Individual differences in the attentional blink.

Authors:  Charlotte Willems; Sander Martens
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.