Literature DB >> 19084999

Executive control processes of working memory predict attentional blink magnitude over and above storage capacity.

Karen M Arnell1, Kirk A Stokes, Mary H MacLean, Carleen Gicante.   

Abstract

When two masked, to-be-attended targets are presented within approximately half a second of each other, performance on the second target (T2) suffers, relative to when the targets are presented further apart in time or when the first target (T1) can be ignored. This phenomenon is known as the attentional blink (AB). Colzato et al. (Psychon Bull Rev 14:1051-1057, 2007) used an individual differences approach to examine whether individual AB magnitude was predicted by individual differences in working memory (WM), using the operation span paradigm (OSPAN). They found that OSPAN score was inversely related to AB magnitude even when a fluid intelligence measure (Raven's SPM) was partialled out. However, it is not clear from this study whether it was the executive control aspect of working memory, the capacity aspect of short-term memory, (or both), that related to AB magnitude. In the present study we used a variety of WM measures that required varying degrees of executive control. OSPAN was negatively related to AB magnitude with Raven's SPM, reading comprehension, reading rate, and digit forward and backward partialled out. Backward and forward digit span did not predict AB magnitude. These results support the conclusion that a "working" executive component of WM predicts temporal limitations of selective attention beyond static STM capacity and general cognitive ability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19084999     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-008-0200-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  28 in total

1.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  E K Vogel; G F Woodman; S J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The attentional blink is immune to masking-induced data limits.

Authors:  E N McLaughlin; D I Shore; R M Klein
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2001-02

3.  Is the prefrontal cortex necessary for delay task performance? Evidence from lesion and FMRI data.

Authors:  Mark D'Esposito; Jeffrey W Cooney; Adam Gazzaley; Sasha E B Gibbs; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.892

4.  Distraction-spanning sustained activity during delayed recognition of locations.

Authors:  Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Working memory and the attentional blink: blink size is predicted by individual differences in operation span.

Authors:  Lorenza S Colzato; Michiel Spapé; Merel M Pannebakker; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-12

6.  Working memory capacity, intelligence, and the magnitude of the attentional blink revisited.

Authors:  Sander Martens; Addie Johnson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Andrew W McCollough; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Attentional networks.

Authors:  M I Posner; S Dehaene
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 13.837

9.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  M M Chun; M C Potter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Relationships between attentional blink magnitude, RSVP target accuracy, and performance on other cognitive tasks.

Authors:  Karen M Arnell; Ashley E Howe; Marc F Joanisse; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-10
View more
  16 in total

1.  PET evidence for a role for striatal dopamine in the attentional blink: functional implications.

Authors:  Heleen A Slagter; Rachel Tomer; Bradley T Christian; Andrew S Fox; Lorenza S Colzato; Carlye R King; Dhanabalan Murali; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Personality predicts temporal attention costs in the attentional blink paradigm.

Authors:  Mary H Maclean; Karen M Arnell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-08

3.  Attentional disengagement in adults with Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Miriam D Lense; Alexandra P Key; Elisabeth M Dykens
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Multiple measures of dispositional global/local bias predict attentional blink magnitude.

Authors:  Gillian Dale; Karen M Arnell
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-07-11

Review 5.  The attentional blink: past, present, and future of a blind spot in perceptual awareness.

Authors:  Sander Martens; Brad Wyble
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Reduced susceptibility to the attentional blink in psychopathic offenders: implications for the attention bottleneck hypothesis.

Authors:  Richard C Wolf; Ryan W Carpenter; Christopher M Warren; Joshua D Zeier; Arielle R Baskin-Sommers; Joseph P Newman
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Attentional blink magnitude is predicted by the ability to keep irrelevant material out of working memory.

Authors:  Karen M Arnell; Shawn M Stubitz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-11-25

8.  Memory search for the first target modulates the magnitude of the attentional blink.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Ashley Sherman; Sage E P Boettcher; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-11

9.  Content-specific working memory modulation of the attentional blink.

Authors:  Elkan G Akyürek; Ali Abedian-Amiri; Sonja M Ostermeier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Individual differences in the attentional blink: the temporal profile of blinkers and non-blinkers.

Authors:  Charlotte Willems; Stefan M Wierda; Eva van Viegen; Sander Martens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.