Literature DB >> 22159732

How reliable is the attentional blink? Examining the relationships within and between attentional blink tasks over time.

Gillian Dale1, Karen M Arnell.   

Abstract

When the second of two targets is presented temporally close (within 500 ms) to the first target in rapid serial visual presentation, accuracy for reporting the second target is markedly diminished-an attentional blink (AB). The AB has become a well-studied phenomenon, and multiple different versions of the AB are currently in use. However, little is known about the stability of individual performance on the AB. The current study examined the reliability of two different versions of the AB task (a task-switch and no-task-switch version) within session, and over the period of 7-10 days, in order to examine performance stability. In addition to testing the reliability, we also examined the relationship between both versions of our AB tasks. Both versions of the AB were shown to be reliable within session, and over time, suggesting that performance is quite stable on this task. In addition, performance on the two different AB tasks was significantly correlated within and across sessions, suggesting that the AB phenomenon is being accurately captured by versions of the AB that include a task-switch. These findings are important given the recent interest in individual differences in performance on the AB.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22159732     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0403-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  12 in total

1.  The attentional blink is immune to masking-induced data limits.

Authors:  E N McLaughlin; D I Shore; R M Klein
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2001-02

2.  Different attentional blink tasks reflect distinct information processing limitations: an individual differences approach.

Authors:  Ashleigh J Kelly; Paul E Dux
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Personality predicts temporal attention costs in the attentional blink paradigm.

Authors:  Mary H Maclean; Karen M Arnell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-08

4.  Individual differences in dispositional focus of attention predict attentional blink magnitude.

Authors:  Gillian Dale; Karen M Arnell
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Working memory and the attentional blink: blink size is predicted by individual differences in operation span.

Authors:  Lorenza S Colzato; Michiel Spapé; Merel M Pannebakker; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-12

6.  Simon says: reliability and the role of working memory and attentional control in the simon task.

Authors:  Karl W U Borgmann; Evan E Risko; Jennifer A Stolz; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

7.  Individual differences in the attentional blink. The important role of irrelevant information.

Authors:  Sander Martens; Nikola Valchev
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2009

8.  Relationships between attentional blink magnitude, RSVP target accuracy, and performance on other cognitive tasks.

Authors:  Karen M Arnell; Ashley E Howe; Marc F Joanisse; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-10

Review 9.  The attentional blink: a review of data and theory.

Authors:  Paul E Dux; René Marois
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Attentional blink magnitude is predicted by the ability to keep irrelevant material out of working memory.

Authors:  Karen M Arnell; Shawn M Stubitz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-11-25
View more
  11 in total

1.  Multiple measures of dispositional global/local bias predict attentional blink magnitude.

Authors:  Gillian Dale; Karen M Arnell
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-07-11

2.  Conflict monitoring and adaptation to affective stimuli as a function of ageing.

Authors:  Richa Nigam; Bhoomika Rastogi Kar
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2021-07-01

3.  The perceptual wink model of non-switching attentional blink tasks.

Authors:  Patrice Rusconi; David E Huber
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

4.  Training the attentional blink: subclinical depression decreases learning potential.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Yuejia Luo; Andre Aleman; Sander Martens
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-10-21

5.  Sleep after practice reduces the attentional blink.

Authors:  Nicola Cellini; Patrick T Goodbourn; Elizabeth A McDevitt; Paolo Martini; Alex O Holcombe; Sara C Mednick
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Individual differences in electrophysiological responses to performance feedback predict AB magnitude.

Authors:  Mary H MaClean; Karen M Arnell
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.526

7.  Conscious perception can be both graded and discrete.

Authors:  Jocelyn L Sy; Hui-Yuan Miao; René Marois; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2021-02-04

8.  Simultaneous and preceding sounds enhance rapid visual targets: Evidence from the attentional blink.

Authors:  Cornelia Kranczioch; Jeremy D Thorne
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2013-09-20

9.  An Individual Differences Approach to Temporal Integration and Order Reversals in the Attentional Blink Task.

Authors:  Charlotte Willems; Jefta D Saija; Elkan G Akyürek; Sander Martens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Time to see the bigger picture: Individual differences in the attentional blink.

Authors:  Charlotte Willems; Sander Martens
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.