Literature DB >> 17224800

Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries.

S Rajasekaran1, S Vidyadhara, Perumal Ramesh, Ajoy P Shetty.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial (level I evidence).
OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of non-navigation and Iso-C based navigation in pedicle screw fixation in thoracic spine deformities. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Thoracic pedicle screw insertion for spinal deformity correction can be associated with increased pedicle breaches. Iso-C based navigation has been reported to improve the accuracy of pedicle screw placement, but its use in the presence of deformity has not been reported.
METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with scoliosis and 6 patients with kyphosis had a total of 478 thoracic pedicle screws. The average Cobb angle was 58.4 degrees +/- 8 degrees (range 50 degrees -80 degrees), and the mean kyphotic angle was 54.6 degrees +/- 4 degrees (range 51 degrees -76 degrees). By random allocation, 17 patients had screw insertion under navigation (242 screws) and 16 under fluoroscopic control (236 screws). The 2 groups were compared for accuracy of screw placement, time for screw insertion, and the number of times the C-arm had to be brought into the field. Two independent blinded observers determined accuracy using postoperative computed tomography assessments.
RESULTS: There were 54 (23%) pedicle breaches in the non-navigation group as compared to only 5 (2%) in the navigation group (P < 0.001). Thirty-eight screws (16%) in the non-navigation group had penetrated the anterior or lateral cortex compared to 2 screws (0.8%) in the navigation group. Average screw insertion time in the non-navigation group was 4.61 +/- 1.05 minutes (range 1.8-6.5) compared to 2.37 +/- 0.72 minutes (range 1.16-4.5) in navigation group (P < 0.01). The C-arm had to be moved into the operation field on an average of 1.5 +/- 0.25 times (range 1-3) per screw. With single screening data, an average of 11.4 pedicles (range 9-14) could be visualized without necessity to bring the C-arm into operating field again.
CONCLUSIONS: Iso-C navigation increases accuracy, and reduces surgical time and radiation in thoracic deformity correction surgeries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17224800     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000252094.64857.ab

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  87 in total

1.  Thoracic pedicle screw insertion in Asian cadaveric specimen: does radiological pedicle profile affect outcome?

Authors:  Chris Yin Wei Chan; Mun Keong Kwan; Lim Beng Saw
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Triggered electromyography for placement of thoracic pedicle screws: is it reliable?

Authors:  Amer F Samdani; Mark Tantorski; Patrick J Cahill; Ashish Ranade; Stephen Koch; David H Clements; Randal R Betz; Jahangir Asghar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Nai-Feng Tian; Qi-Shan Huang; Ping Zhou; Yang Zhou; Rui-Kai Wu; Yi Lou; Hua-Zi Xu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Computer navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided navigation for thoracic pedicle screw placement: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Tong Meng; Xiao-Fei Guan; Hai-Long Zhang; Shi-Sheng He
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  O-arm(®)-based spinal navigation and intraoperative 3D-imaging: first experiences.

Authors:  O Gonschorek; S Hauck; U Spiegl; T Weiß; R Pätzold; V Bühren
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  3D-based navigation in posterior stabilisations of the cervical and thoracic spine: problems and benefits. Results of 451 screws.

Authors:  J-S Jarvers; S Katscher; A Franck; S Glasmacher; C Schmidt; T Blattert; C Josten
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.693

7.  Pedicle Screw Placement in the Thoracolumbar Spine Using a Novel, Simple, Safe, and Effective Guide-Pin : A Computerized Tomography Analysis.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Hyun; Yongjung J Kim; Seung-Chul Rhim; Gene Cheh; Samuel K Cho
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-07-31

8.  Computer-Assisted Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery.

Authors:  Timo Stübig; Henning Windhagen; Christian Krettek; Max Ettinger
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  What is the learning curve for robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement in spine surgery?

Authors:  Xiaobang Hu; Isador H Lieberman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Comparison of superior-level facet joint violations during open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Ranjith Babu; Jong G Park; Ankit I Mehta; Tony Shan; Peter M Grossi; Christopher R Brown; William J Richardson; Robert E Isaacs; Carlos A Bagley; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; Oren N Gottfried
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.654

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.