Literature DB >> 11922736

Impact of polymer pore size on the interface scar formation in a rat model.

U Klinge1, B Klosterhalfen, V Birkenhauer, K Junge, J Conze, V Schumpelick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The surgical therapy of hernias is increasingly based on reinforcement with alloplastic material, in particular surgical meshes. The biological response to these foreign bodies largely depends on the selected material and its structure. In comparison to the physiological scar process following a simple abdominal wall incision, the chronic inflammation at the interface to the polymers lead to specific morphological alterations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the present study two meshes with different pore sizes were implanted into rats: a heavy-weight and small-pore-sized mesh (hw-mesh) made of nonabsorbable polypropylene monofilaments and a low-weight large-pore-sized mesh consisting of polypropylene and of absorbable polyglactin multifilaments (lw-mesh). A suture repair of a laparotomy served as control. After 7, 14, 21, and 90 days the mesh area was analyzed with regard to tissue and cellular response.
RESULTS: Over the whole observation period morphometric analysis indicated an improved integration of the lw-mesh with reduction of both inflammation and fibrosis, whereas the hw-mesh induced an intense chronic inflammation concomitant with an intensified bridging scar reaction. On the cellular level these findings correspond to an elevated cell turnover, characterized by increased rates of apoptotic and proliferating cells. In contrast, the tissue reaction to the lw-mesh achieved levels almost similar to those of the physiological scaring process in the control group.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the present data confirm the development of a chronic inflammatory foreign body reaction at the interface to both hw-meshes and lw-meshes; however, the use of lw-meshes showed superior tissue integration. With regard to the quite similar polymer surface the pore size appears to be of major importance in tissue reaction and for the biocompatibility of mesh structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11922736     DOI: 10.1006/jsre.2002.6358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  97 in total

1.  Causes of recurrences after Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty.

Authors:  U Klinge; K Junge; M Stumpf
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Fixation of mesh to the peritoneum using a fibrin glue: investigations with a biomechanical model and an experimental laparoscopic porcine model.

Authors:  C Schug-Pass; H Lippert; F Köckerling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Impact of endoscopic and histological evaluations of two different types of mesh plug for a groin hernia model.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Mandai; Minoru Naito; Tatsuro Hayashi; Hiroaki Asano; Hideo Ino; Kazunori Tsukuda; Shinichiro Miyoshi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Inflammatory reaction and neotissue maturation in the early host tissue incorporation of polypropylene prostheses.

Authors:  G Pascual; M Rodríguez; S Sotomayor; B Pérez-Köhler; J M Bellón
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Shrinkage of intraperitoneal onlay mesh in sheep: coated polyester mesh versus covered polypropylene mesh.

Authors:  N B Zinther; P Wara; H Friis-Andersen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Physicomechanical evaluation of absorbable and nonabsorbable barrier composite meshes for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Corey R Deeken; Michael S Abdo; Margaret M Frisella; Brent D Matthews
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Ultrasound appearances after mesh implantation--evidence of mesh contraction or folding?

Authors:  Kamil Svabík; Alois Martan; Jaromir Masata; Rachid El-Haddad; Petr Hubka; Marketa Pavlikova
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Searching for the best polypropylene mesh to be used in bowel contamination.

Authors:  A Díaz-Godoy; M A García-Ureña; J López-Monclús; V Vega Ruíz; D Melero Montes; N Erquinigo Agurto
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 9.  Which mesh for hernia repair?

Authors:  C N Brown; J G Finch
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Relationship between tissue ingrowth and mesh contraction.

Authors:  Rodrigo Gonzalez; Kim Fugate; David McClusky; E Matt Ritter; Andrew Lederman; Dirk Dillehay; C Daniel Smith; Bruce J Ramshaw
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.