Literature DB >> 12169360

The structure of a biomaterial rather than its chemical composition modulates the repair process at the peritoneal level.

Juan M Bellón1, Francisca Jurado, Natalio García-Honduvilla, Raquel López, Antonio Carrera-San Martín, Julia Buján.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to establish whether the spatial structure of a prosthesis conditions its behavior at the peritoneal level.
METHODS: Abdominal defects comprising all the wall (except skin) were created in rabbits and repaired with a laminar (DM) or reticular (CV-4) ePTFE-prosthesis. Fourteen days postimplant, specimens were obtained for scanning electron and light microscopy. Peritoneal adhesions, resistance to traction, and neoperitoneum thickness were quantified.
RESULTS: Adhesions to CV-4 were firm and integrated within surrounding tissue; only scarce adhesion formation was observed for DM. Adhesion area was significantly greater (P <0.01) in the CV-4 than in DM (7.00 +/- 2.6; 0.15 +/- 0.08 cm(2)). The neoperitoneum was organized for DM and disorganized for CV-4. This layer was significantly thicker (P <0.05) in DM than CV-4 (455 +/- 3.4; 70 +/- 3.1 microm). The CV-4 showed a greater resistance to traction than the DM (26.75 +/- 3.71; 14.11 +/- 3.71 N; P <0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The structure of a biomaterial, rather than its chemical composition, modulates behavior at the peritoneal interface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12169360     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00907-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  13 in total

1.  Experimental comparison of monofile light and heavy polypropylene meshes: less weight does not mean less biological response.

Authors:  U Klinge
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  A lightweight polypropylene mesh (TiMesh) for laparoscopic intraperitoneal repair of abdominal wall hernias: comparison of biocompatibility with the DualMesh in an experimental study using the porcine model.

Authors:  C Schug-Pass; C Tamme; A Tannapfel; F Köckerling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The use of composite meshes in laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall hernias: are there differences in biocompatibily?: experimental results obtained in a laparoscopic porcine model.

Authors:  Christine Schug-Pass; Florian Sommerer; Andrea Tannapfel; Hans Lippert; Ferdinand Köckerling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Mesh biocompatibility: effects of cellular inflammation and tissue remodelling.

Authors:  Karsten Junge; Marcel Binnebösel; Klaus T von Trotha; Raphael Rosch; Uwe Klinge; Ulf P Neumann; Petra Lynen Jansen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 5.  Biocompatibility of prosthetic meshes in abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Marcel Binnebösel; Klaus T von Trotha; Petra Lynen Jansen; Joachim Conze; Ulf P Neumann; Karsten Junge
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 9.623

6.  Evaluation of a knitted polytetrafluoroethylene mesh placed intraperitoneally in a New Zealand white rabbit model.

Authors:  Tomáš Novotný; Jiří Jeřábek; Karel Veselý; Robert Staffa; Martin Dvořák; Jan Cagaš
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Postoperative ileus after laparoscopic primary and incisional abdominal hernia repair with intraperitoneal mesh (DynaMesh®-IPOM versus Parietex™ Composite): a single institution experience.

Authors:  Andreas Domen; Cedric Stabel; Rami Jawad; Nicolas Duchateau; Erik Fransen; Patrick Vanclooster; Charles de Gheldere
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-05-31       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Adhesion prevention in ventral hernia repair: an experimental study comparing three lightweight porous meshes recommended for intraperitoneal use.

Authors:  L D'Amore; F Ceci; S Mattia; M Fabbi; P Negro; F Gossetti
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Textile properties of synthetic prolapse mesh in response to uniaxial loading.

Authors:  William R Barone; Pamela A Moalli; Steven D Abramowitch
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 10.  Polymer Hernia Repair Materials: Adapting to Patient Needs and Surgical Techniques.

Authors:  Marta Rodríguez; Verónica Gómez-Gil; Bárbara Pérez-Köhler; Gemma Pascual; Juan Manuel Bellón
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.