Literature DB >> 15309687

Polypropylene in the intra-abdominal position: influence of pore size and surface area.

J Conze1, R Rosch, U Klinge, C Weiss, M Anurov, S Titkowa, A Oettinger, V Schumpelick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Polypropylene is a material widely used in surgery. Because of its association with formation of enterocutaneous fistulae and adhesions, direct contact between mesh and intestine is avoided. The following study was designed to investigate the adhesive potential of different polypropylene meshes when placed in direct contact with intestine.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In an established experimental model, a total of 45 chinchilla rabbits underwent laparoscopic placement of meshes with different pore size (Group I: monofilament PP 0.6 mm, Group II: monofilament PP 2.5 mm, Group III: multifilament PP 4.0 mm) with the Intra-Peritoneal-Onlay-Mesh Technique (IPOM). The degree of adhesion formation was measured after 7, 21, and 90 days, evaluated by an adhesion score, quantified by computer-assisted planimetry, followed by histological and morphometric investigation of the perifilamental granuloma formation.
RESULTS: The heavyweight, small porous polypropylene meshes (PP 0.6) showed significantly stronger adhesion formation at all intervals of investigation compared with the lightweight meshes with a pore size >2.5 mm. Between the two different lightweight mesh variations, there was no significant difference. Granuloma formation was lowest in large-pore-size monofilament meshes (PP 2.5).
CONCLUSION: The IPOM rabbit model is suitable for investigation of biomaterials in the intra-abdominal position. Our results show that the adhesive potential is significantly influenced by the pore size. However, the extent of the foreign-body reaction seems also to be influenced by the filament structure, respectively, the surface area, favoring monofilament material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15309687     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-004-0268-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  35 in total

1.  THE HEALING OF PERITNEUM UNDER NORMAL AND PATHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS.

Authors:  H ELLIS; W HARRISON; T B HUGH
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1965-06       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Prophylaxis of pelvic sidewall adhesions with Gore-Tex surgical membrane: a multicenter clinical investigation. The Surgical Membrane Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Carboxymethylcellulose coated on visceral face of polypropylene mesh prevents adhesion without impairing wound healing in incisional hernia model in rats.

Authors:  B Yelimlieş; A Alponat; A Cubukçu; M Kuru; S Oz; C Erçin; N Gönüllü
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Ileocutaneous fistula formation following laparoscopic polypropylene mesh hernia repair.

Authors:  K Miller; W Junger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Biomaterials for abdominal wall hernia surgery and principles of their applications.

Authors:  P K Amid; A G Shulman; I L Lichtenstein; M Hakakha
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1994

6.  Functional and morphologic properties of a modified mesh for inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Karsten Junge; Uwe Klinge; Raphael Rosch; Bernd Klosterhalfen; Volker Schumpelick
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Pitfalls and complications with laparoscopic intraperitoneal expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch repair of postoperative ventral hernia.

Authors:  M Ben-Haim; J Kuriansky; R Tal; O Zmora; Y Mintz; D Rosin; A Ayalon; M Shabtai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Modified mesh for hernia repair that is adapted to the physiology of the abdominal wall.

Authors:  U Klinge; B Klosterhalfen; J Conze; W Limberg; B Obolenski; A P Ottinger; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1998-12

9.  Enterocutaneous fistula as a postoperative complication of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  A M Klein; T C Banever
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1999-01

10.  Repair of ventral hernias with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch.

Authors:  E M Balén; A Díez-Caballero; J L Hernández-Lizoáin; F Pardo; J R Torramadé; F M Regueira; J A Cienfuegos
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  39 in total

1.  Novel technique of overlaying a poly-L: -lactic acid nanosheet for adhesion prophylaxis and fixation of intraperitoneal onlay polypropylene mesh in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Keiichi Fujino; Manabu Kinoshita; Akihiro Saitoh; Hidekazu Yano; Kahoko Nishikawa; Toshinori Fujie; Keiichi Iwaya; Minoru Kakihara; Shinji Takeoka; Daizoh Saitoh; Yuji Tanaka
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Long-term evaluation of adhesion formation and foreign body response to three new meshes.

Authors:  R R M Vogels; K W Y van Barneveld; J W A M Bosmans; G Beets; M J J Gijbels; M H F Schreinemacher; N D Bouvy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Fixation of mesh to the peritoneum using a fibrin glue: investigations with a biomechanical model and an experimental laparoscopic porcine model.

Authors:  C Schug-Pass; H Lippert; F Köckerling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Experimental comparison of monofile light and heavy polypropylene meshes: less weight does not mean less biological response.

Authors:  U Klinge
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Experimental comparison of monofile light and heavy polypropylene meshes: less weight does not mean less biological response.

Authors:  Grigoris Chatzimavroudis; Basilis Papaziogas; Ioannis Koutelidakis; Konstantinos Atmatzidis
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  [General surgery under discussion. From the viewpoint of vascular surgery].

Authors:  E S Debus; H H Eckstein; D Böckler; H Imig; A Florek
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Does the additional application of a polylactide film (SurgiWrap) to a lightweight mesh (TiMesh) reduce adhesions after laparoscopic intraperitoneal implantation procedures? Experimental results obtained with the laparoscopic porcine model.

Authors:  Christine Schug-Pass; Florian Sommerer; Andrea Tannapfel; Hans Lippert; Ferdinand Köckerling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The use of composite meshes in laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall hernias: are there differences in biocompatibily?: experimental results obtained in a laparoscopic porcine model.

Authors:  Christine Schug-Pass; Florian Sommerer; Andrea Tannapfel; Hans Lippert; Ferdinand Köckerling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Surgical mesh for ventral incisional hernia repairs: Understanding mesh design.

Authors:  Ali Rastegarpour; Michael Cheung; Madhurima Vardhan; Mohamed M Ibrahim; Charles E Butler; Howard Levinson
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 0.947

Review 10.  Mesh biocompatibility: effects of cellular inflammation and tissue remodelling.

Authors:  Karsten Junge; Marcel Binnebösel; Klaus T von Trotha; Raphael Rosch; Uwe Klinge; Ulf P Neumann; Petra Lynen Jansen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.